| Literature DB >> 33281261 |
Amir Roointan1, Reza Kamali-Kakhki1, Mohammad Fathalipour1, Zohreh Hashemi1, Mohammad Mehdi Zarshenas2, Mohammad Soleimani3, Ruhola Mirjani1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Burn wound infection and sepsis are serious medical conditions requiring prompt intervention. Plants are a good natural source for the development of novel, safe, and cost-effective antibacterial agents. The objective of the present study was to assess the antibacterial potential of aqueous, chloroform, and methanol extracts of the Prunus scoparia (P. scoparia) root against the most common burn wound pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-bacterial agents ; Flavonoids; Herbal medicine ; Phenols ; Wounds and injuries
Year: 2020 PMID: 33281261 PMCID: PMC7707634 DOI: 10.30476/ijms.2019.82071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Med Sci ISSN: 0253-0716
Figure 1The fractionation procedure to obtain pure extracts is illustrated.
Minimal inhibitory concentration and minimal bactericidal concentration of Prunus scoparia root extract and the obtained fractions against tested microorganisms (dashes indicate the growth of microorganisms)
| Plant | Extract | Tested microorganisms and antibacterial parameters | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) | A. baumannii (NCTC 13304) | E. coli (ATCC 25922) | P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) | K. pneumoniae (ATCC 700603) | S. marcescens (ATCC BAA2808) | ||||||||||
| MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | ||
| Chloroform | 25 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 12.50 | 12.50 | |
| Aqueous | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Methanol extract | 1.15 | 1.15 | 6.25 | 6.25 | 6.25 | 6.25 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 25 | 25 | 6.25 | 6.25 | |
| Petroleum ether | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Dichloromethane | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Ethyl acetate | 0.78 | 1.15 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 6.25 | 6.25 | 3.12 | 6.25 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 6.25 | 12.50 | |
| Remaining methanol extract | 3.12 | 6.25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12.50 | 25 | |
MIC: Minimal inhibitory concentration (mg/mL), MBC: Minimal bactericidal concentration (mg/mL), MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , ATCC: American type culture collection, NCTC: The national collection of type cultures, S. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus , E. faecalis: Enterococcus faecalis, A. baumannii: Acinetobacter baumannii, E. coli: Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae: Klebsiella pneumoniae, S. marcescens: Serratia marcescens
Figure 2The results of agar well diffusion assay for different fractions obtained from the crude methanol extract of P. scoparia root are illustrated. F1: First fraction, F2: Second fraction, F3: Third fraction, F4: Fourth fraction, Yellow boxes: Fraction per sample responsible for bacterial growth inhibition
Preliminary phytochemical analysis of the Prunus scoparia root extract and the fractions, as well as total phenolic content (mg GAE/g sample) and total flavonoid content (mg CEQ/g sample) in the third and fourth fractions
| Fractions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract (yield: 29.2%) | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |
| Alkaloids | + | - | - | + | + |
| Anthocyanins | - | - | - | - | - |
| Anthraquinones | + | - | - | + | + |
| Saponins | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tannins | + | - | - | + | + |
| Terpenoids | + | - | + | + | - |
| Flavonoids | + | - | - | +(35.44±4.12) | +(8.31±2.12) |
| Phenols | + | - | - | +(123.06±6.43) | +(57.62±5.23) |
F1: First fraction (petroleum ether), F2: Second fraction (dichloromethane), F3: Third fraction (ethyl acetate), F4: Fourth fraction (remaining methanol extract)