Amy E Leader1, Amelia Burke-Garcia2, Philip M Massey3, Jill B Roark4. 1. Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut Street, Suite 314, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States. Electronic address: amy.leader@jefferson.edu. 2. NORC at the University of Chicago, 4350 East-West Highway, 8th Floor, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States. 3. Department of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel Dornsife School of Public Health, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. 4. 109 Casa Bay Place, St Augustine, FL 32080, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While anti-vaccine messages on social media have been studied for content, reach, and effectiveness, less is known about those who create and promote the messages. Online influencers, or 'everyday people who are influential within their online social networks', are viewed as trusted voices who are often making similar life decisions as their followers. Therefore, their experiences with and perspectives on health issues can be persuasive. METHODS: We collaborated with a formal network of online influencers to interview, using a semi-structured interview guide, vaccine hesitant influencer mothers about their views on vaccination; their process for developing health-related social media content; their motivation to promote anti-vaccine messages; and their opinions on current vaccination messaging. Prescreening ensured a diverse sample by race/ethnicity, age, education, number of children, and geographic residence. Interviews occurred by telephone, were audio recorded, and transcribed. Themes were generated independently by two coders using a deductive coding approach. RESULTS: We interviewed 15 online influencer mothers from across the U.S. (average age 39 years old; all married; 13 Caucasian, 1 African American, 1 Hispanic). In some capacity, 5 of the 15 wrote about vaccination on their blog. Those who chose not to post anti-vaccine content did so for fear of alienating followers or having their platform be the site of combative discourse among readers. When researching their social media posts, the influencers did not trust mainstream sources of health information and relied on alternative sources and search engines. IMPLICATIONS: This exploratory study interviewed influential mothers who have the ability to spread anti-vaccine messages on social media. While most do not contribute to the anti-vaccine sentiment, understanding the motivation and practices of those that do assists the public health community in better understanding the online vaccination communication environment, leading to more effective messages to counterbalance anti-vaccine content on social media.
BACKGROUND: While anti-vaccine messages on social media have been studied for content, reach, and effectiveness, less is known about those who create and promote the messages. Online influencers, or 'everyday people who are influential within their online social networks', are viewed as trusted voices who are often making similar life decisions as their followers. Therefore, their experiences with and perspectives on health issues can be persuasive. METHODS: We collaborated with a formal network of online influencers to interview, using a semi-structured interview guide, vaccine hesitant influencer mothers about their views on vaccination; their process for developing health-related social media content; their motivation to promote anti-vaccine messages; and their opinions on current vaccination messaging. Prescreening ensured a diverse sample by race/ethnicity, age, education, number of children, and geographic residence. Interviews occurred by telephone, were audio recorded, and transcribed. Themes were generated independently by two coders using a deductive coding approach. RESULTS: We interviewed 15 online influencer mothers from across the U.S. (average age 39 years old; all married; 13 Caucasian, 1 African American, 1 Hispanic). In some capacity, 5 of the 15 wrote about vaccination on their blog. Those who chose not to post anti-vaccine content did so for fear of alienating followers or having their platform be the site of combative discourse among readers. When researching their social media posts, the influencers did not trust mainstream sources of health information and relied on alternative sources and search engines. IMPLICATIONS: This exploratory study interviewed influential mothers who have the ability to spread anti-vaccine messages on social media. While most do not contribute to the anti-vaccine sentiment, understanding the motivation and practices of those that do assists the public health community in better understanding the online vaccination communication environment, leading to more effective messages to counterbalance anti-vaccine content on social media.
Authors: David A Broniatowski; Amelia M Jamison; SiHua Qi; Lulwah AlKulaib; Tao Chen; Adrian Benton; Sandra C Quinn; Mark Dredze Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kevin Wright; Carla Fisher; Camella Rising; Amelia Burke-Garcia; Dasha Afanaseva; Xiaomei Cai Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Catherine Decouttere; Stany Banzimana; Pål Davidsen; Carla Van Riet; Corinne Vandermeulen; Elizabeth Mason; Mohammad S Jalali; Nico Vandaele Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 9.408