Literature DB >> 33280246

The critical impact of tumor size in predicting cancer special survival for T3aM0M0 renal cell carcinoma: A proposal of an alternative T3aN0M0 stage.

Luping Li1, Lei Shi2, Junjie Zhang1, Yingzhong Fan1, Qi Li2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Based on the eighth TNM staging system, T3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is identified as an anatomical extrarenal invasion and does not consider the size of the tumor; however, it may not fully predict the prognosis of the patient. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of tumor size effects on prognosis in T3a RCC and propose an alternative tumor stage system combined with T1-2.
METHODS: Data relating to T1-3aN0M0 RCC (n = 49586) were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2015). Survival analyses were conducted by Cox regression and Fine and Gray regression. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) was used to assess the discriminatory ability of the prognostic factors.
RESULTS: A 1-cm increase in T3a RCC resulted in an 8% increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.10, p < 0.001) and 14% increase in the risk of RCC-specific mortality (sub-distribution HR [sHR]: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.11-1.16, p < 0.001). T3a tumor size stratified by the cutoff of 4 cm and 7 cm showed a better prediction of RCC-special survival (c-index: 0.644), compared with a cutoff just by 4 cm (c-index: 0.571) or by 7 cm (c-index: 0.602). Compared with T1b tumors, T3a RCC ≤4 cm showed no differences in terms of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79-1.09; p = 0.37) and mortality caused by RCC (sHR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.70-1.19; p = 0.50). Last, the alternative T-staging system (T1a, a combination of T1b and T3a [≤4 cm], T2a, T2b, T3a [4-7 cm], and T3a [>7] cm) demonstrated good RCC-special survival predictive accuracy (c-index: 0.729), which was higher than that shown by the current eighth edition T-staging system (c-index: 0.720).
CONCLUSION: Tumor size should be taken into consideration for T3aN0M0 RCC rather than based on anatomical features alone.
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER; TNM; kidney carcinoma; prognostication; stage

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33280246      PMCID: PMC7877365          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


  26 in total

1.  Perioperative morbidity, oncological outcomes and predictors of pT3a upstaging for patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for cT1 tumors.

Authors:  Pascal Mouracade; Onder Kara; Julien Dagenais; M J Maurice; R J Nelson; Ercan Malkoc; J H Kaouk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Partial Nephrectomy is Associated with Higher Risk of Relapse Compared with Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical Stage T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma Pathologically Up Staged to T3a.

Authors:  Paras H Shah; Daniel M Moreira; Vinay R Patel; Geoffrey Gaunay; Arvin K George; Manaf Alom; Zachary Kozel; Oksana Yaskiv; Simon J Hall; Michael J Schwartz; Manish A Vira; Lee Richstone; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Evaluation of the prognostic significance of perirenal fat invasion and tumor size in patients with pT1-pT3a localized renal cell carcinoma in a comprehensive multicenter study of the CORONA project. Can we improve prognostic discrimination for patients with stage pT3a tumors?

Authors:  Sabine D Brookman-May; Matthias May; Ingmar Wolff; Richard Zigeuner; Georg C Hutterer; Luca Cindolo; Luigi Schips; Ottavio De Cobelli; Bernardo Rocco; Cosimo De Nunzio; Andrea Tubaro; Ioman Coman; Michael Truss; Orietta Dalpiaz; Bogdan Feciche; Robert S Figenshau; Kerry Madison; Manuel Sánchez-Chapado; Maria del Carmen Santiago Martin; Luigi Salzano; Giuseppe Lotrecchiano; Stefan Zastrow; Manfred Wirth; Petros Sountoulides; Shahrokh Shariat; Raphaela Waidelich; Christian Stief; Sven Gunia
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Is Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Safe for T3a Renal Cell Carcinoma? Experience of a High-Volume Center.

Authors:  Hiury S Andrade; Homayoun Zargar; Oktay Akca; Onder Kara; Peter A Caputo; Daniel Ramirez; Guillermo Andrés; Robert J Stein; Shih-Chieh J Chueh; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Multi-institutional Survival Analysis of Incidental Pathologic T3a Upstaging in Clinical T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma Following Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Christopher M Russell; Amir H Lebastchi; Juan Chipollini; Adam Niemann; Rohit Mehra; Todd M Morgan; David C Miller; Ganesh S Palapattu; Khaled S Hafez; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Alon Z Weizer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Partial nephrectomy does not compromise survival in patients with pathologic upstaging to pT2/pT3 or high-grade renal tumors compared with radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Christopher J Weight; Casey Lythgoe; Raman Unnikrishnan; Brian R Lane; Steven C Campbell; Amr F Fergany
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Impact of tumor size on patient survival after radical nephrectomy for pathological T3a renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yutaka Sugiyama; Junji Yatsuda; Yoji Murakami; Noriyuki Ito; Toshinari Yamasaki; Yoshiki Mikami; Osamu Ogawa; Tomomi Kamba
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Prognostic relevance of tumour size in T3a renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre experience.

Authors:  John S Lam; Tobias Klatte; Jean-Jacques Patard; Rakhee H Goel; François Guillè; Bernard Lobel; Clement-Claude Abbou; Alexandre De La Taille; Jacques Tostain; Luca Cindolo; Vincenzo Altieri; Vincenzo Ficarra; Walter Artibani; Tommaso Prayer-Galetti; Luigi Schips; Richard Zigeuner; Allan J Pantuck; Robert A Figlin; Arie S Belldegrun
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Changhee Yoo; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Choung-Soo Kim; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Upstaging to pT3a in Patients Undergoing Partial or Radical Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes and Predictive Factors.

Authors:  Alessandro Veccia; Ugo Falagario; Alberto Martini; Michele Marchioni; Alessandro Antonelli; Claudio Simeone; Luigi Cormio; Umberto Capitanio; M Carmen Mir; Ithaar Derweesh; Hendrik Van Poppel; Francesco Porpiglia; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2020-06-19
View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical significance of novel DNA methylation biomarkers for renal clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Raimonda Kubiliūtė; Kristina Žukauskaitė; Algirdas Žalimas; Albertas Ulys; Rasa Sabaliauskaitė; Arnas Bakavičius; Arūnas Želvys; Feliksas Jankevičius; Sonata Jarmalaitė
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Association of Extrarenal Invasion Patterns and Tumor Size with the Differences in Survival Outcomes of T3a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Proposal Modified T3a Stage System is Needed.

Authors:  XiaoFei Wu; Qiong Wang; Zhixian Wang; Xian Zhao; XiaoJing Xu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-01-07

3.  Comparison of prognosis between patients undergoing radical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma ≤7 cm T3aN0/xM0: Survival benefit is biased toward partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Chunxiang Feng; Chang Liu; Zhixian Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.