Literature DB >> 17316970

Prognostic relevance of tumour size in T3a renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre experience.

John S Lam1, Tobias Klatte, Jean-Jacques Patard, Rakhee H Goel, François Guillè, Bernard Lobel, Clement-Claude Abbou, Alexandre De La Taille, Jacques Tostain, Luca Cindolo, Vincenzo Altieri, Vincenzo Ficarra, Walter Artibani, Tommaso Prayer-Galetti, Luigi Schips, Richard Zigeuner, Allan J Pantuck, Robert A Figlin, Arie S Belldegrun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic role of tumour size in pathological stage T3a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with fat invasion only and to assess whether this subgroup maintains its relevance over the other pathological stages.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 2113 patients from eight international institutions who were treated by surgical resection for T2-4 RCC. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis of patients with T3a RCC showed that tumour size was significantly associated with DSS (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12, p<0.001). An ideal cut-off of 7 cm for these patients was identified with a scatter plot of Martingale residuals and tumour size. The two T3a groups were distinctly different with respect to clinicopathologic parameters (performance status, metastases, grade, histological subtype) and survival (p<0.001). Median survival time was not reached for patients with T2 and T3a< or =7 cm disease with a 5- and 10-yr DSS rate of 70% and 59% and 63% and 53%, respectively. Median survival time for patients with T3a>7 cm, T3b, T3c, and T4 disease was 54, 46, 21, and 11 mo, respectively, with 5- and 10-yr DSS rates of 46% and 36%, 46% and 36%, 34% and 0%, and 16% and 14%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that tumour size is an important factor for predicting outcome of patients with T3a RCC with fat invasion only. Our findings should merit consideration during the next revision of the TNM classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17316970     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  21 in total

1.  Cystic renal cell carcinoma carries an excellent prognosis regardless of tumor size.

Authors:  Brian R Winters; John L Gore; Sarah K Holt; Jonathan D Harper; Daniel W Lin; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Perioperative morbidity, oncological outcomes and predictors of pT3a upstaging for patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for cT1 tumors.

Authors:  Pascal Mouracade; Onder Kara; Julien Dagenais; M J Maurice; R J Nelson; Ercan Malkoc; J H Kaouk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology--multifactorial decision support systems.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Maud H W Starmans; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Georgi Nalbantov; Hugo J W L Aerts; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Paul C Boutros; Pierluigi Granone; Vincenzo Valentini; Adrian C Begg; Dirk De Ruysscher; Andre Dekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Survival analysis of surgically treated renal cell carcinoma: a single Chinese medical center experience from 2002 to 2012.

Authors:  Yushi Zhang; Hongyan Yu; Hanzhong Li
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Outcomes of curative nephrectomy against renal cell carcinoma based on a central pathological review of 914 specimens from the era of cytokine treatment.

Authors:  Noriyuki Ito; Shinsuke Kojima; Satoshi Teramukai; Yoshiki Mikami; Osamu Ogawa; Tomomi Kamba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Stage T3a renal cell carcinoma: staging accuracy of CT for sinus fat, perinephric fat or renal vein invasion.

Authors:  H K Sokhi; W Y Mok; U Patel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Pathological Stage T3a Significantly Increases Disease Recurrence across All Tumor Sizes in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael Chevinsky; Mariam Imnadze; Alexander Sankin; Andrew Winer; Roy Mano; Christopher Jakubowski; Joseph Mashni; Daniel D Sjoberg; Ying-Bei Chen; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter; A Ari Hakimi; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prognostic significance of perirenal infiltration in renal cell carcinoma (<7 cm).

Authors:  Seongyub Oh; Jangho Yoon; Dongil Kang; Heung Lae Cho; Jae-il Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Prognosticators and outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma and adjacent organ invasion treated with radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Leonardo D Borregales; Dae Y Kim; Angie L Staller; Wei Qiao; Arun Z Thomas; Mehrad Adibi; Pheroze Tamboli; Kanishka Sircar; Eric Jonasch; Nizar M Tannir; Surena F Matin; Christopher G Wood; Jose A Karam
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  Staging of renal cell carcinoma: Current concepts.

Authors:  John S Lam; Tobias Klatte; Alberto Breda
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.