Literature DB >> 20868814

Reoperative valve surgery in the elderly: predictors of risk and long-term survival.

Leora B Balsam1, Eugene A Grossi, David G Greenhouse, Patricia Ursomanno, Abelardo Deanda, Greg H Ribakove, Alfred T Culliford, Aubrey C Galloway.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients requiring reoperative cardiac surgery for valve disease are considered high risk for immediate outcomes, but little is known about their long-term survival. It is often conjectured that medical therapy provides equivalent late survival in this population, which may dissuade both patient and surgeon from considering reoperation. We analyzed a cohort of such patients undergoing reoperative valve surgery to determine their long-term survival.
METHODS: From 1992 through 2007, 363 patients aged 75 years or more underwent reoperative isolated valve surgery; 211 (58%) had aortic valve replacement and 152 (42%) had mitral valve surgery. Mean age was 80.5 years. Hospital outcomes were prospectively recorded. Survival from all-cause death was determined from the Social Security Death Index.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 13.8% (12.8% for aortic and 15.1% for mitral valve operations; p = 0.52). Multivariable predictors of hospital death were New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure (odds ratio = 3.19, p = 0.012), dialysis (odds ratio = 15.63, p = 0.003), and more than one reoperation (odds ratio = 2.59, p = 0.058). At 5 years, overall survival was 62% ± 3% for all patients (66% ± 4% for aortic and 56% ± 4% for mitral valve patients). For aortic valve patients aged 80 years or more, 5-year survival was 60% ± 0.6%. Life expectancy table analysis predicted a 5-year survival of 57% for an age-matched and sex-matched comparison group.
CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative surgery for elderly patients with isolated aortic or mitral valve pathology is associated with excellent long-term survival, particularly when treating aortic valve disease. While in-hospital mortality is higher among the elderly than among younger patients, specific predictors of poor outcome can be identified preoperatively to risk stratify these patients.
Copyright © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868814     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  18 in total

Review 1.  Transseptal Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement for Post-Surgical Mitral Failures.

Authors:  Marvin H Eng; Dee Dee Wang
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

Review 2.  Valve-in-valve implantations: is this the new standard for degenerated bioprostheses? Review of the literature.

Authors:  Krys Milburn; Vinayak Bapat; Martyn Thomas
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture During Valve-in-valve TAVR: Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  John T Saxon; Keith B Allen; David J Cohen; Adnan K Chhatriwalla
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-01

4.  Structural valve deterioration of a mitral Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in an 87-year-old woman 16 years after its implantation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ito; Kensuke Sakata; Takashi Haruki; Yurio Kobayashi
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive valve surgery compared with median sternotomy coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery in patients with prior cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Angelo LaPietra; Maurice Mawad; Jason C Wigley; Nirat Beohar; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Minimally invasive valve surgery in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; S Howard Wittels; Evin Yucel; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Outcomes of a hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Steve Xydas; Roy F Williams; Angelo LaPietra; Maurice Mawad; Gerald P Rosen; Nirat Beohar; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Missing leaflet: a rare cause of structural deterioration of a bovine pericardial aortic bioprosthesis-report of a case.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Nakamura; Yoshikazu Fujiwara; Suguru Shiraya; Munehiro Saiki; Shingo Harada; Yuichiro Kishimoto; Takeshi Onohara; Yuki Otsuki; Motonobu Nishimura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Predictors of in-hospital mortality following redo cardiac surgery: Single center experience.

Authors:  Yucel Colkesen; Isa Coskun; Murat Cayli; Oner Gulcan
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2015-09-28

10.  Protecting patient privacy in survival analyses.

Authors:  Luca Bonomi; Xiaoqian Jiang; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.