Literature DB >> 28246273

Added Value of Serum Hormone Measurements in Risk Prediction Models for Breast Cancer for Women Not Using Exogenous Hormones: Results from the EPIC Cohort.

Anika Hüsing1, Renée T Fortner2, Tilman Kühn1, Kim Overvad3, Anne Tjønneland4, Anja Olsen4, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault5,6,7, Gianluca Severi5,6,7,8, Agnes Fournier5,6,7, Heiner Boeing9, Antonia Trichopoulou10,11, Vassiliki Benetou10,11, Philippos Orfanos10,11, Giovanna Masala12, Valeria Pala13, Rosario Tumino14, Francesca Fasanelli15, Salvatore Panico16, H Bas Bueno de Mesquita17,18, Petra H Peeters19,20, Carla H van Gills19, J Ramón Quirós21, Antonio Agudo22, Maria-Jose Sánchez23,24, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque24,25,26, Aurelio Barricarte24,27,28, Pilar Amiano29, Kay-Tee Khaw30, Ruth C Travis31, Laure Dossus32, Kuanrong Li32, Pietro Ferrari32, Melissa A Merritt33, Ioanna Tzoulaki33, Elio Riboli33, Rudolf Kaaks1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Circulating hormone concentrations are associated with breast cancer risk, with well-established associations for postmenopausal women. Biomarkers may represent minimally invasive measures to improve risk prediction models.Experimental Design: We evaluated improvements in discrimination gained by adding serum biomarker concentrations to risk estimates derived from risk prediction models developed by Gail and colleagues and Pfeiffer and colleagues using a nested case-control study within the EPIC cohort, including 1,217 breast cancer cases and 1,976 matched controls. Participants were pre- or postmenopausal at blood collection. Circulating sex steroids, prolactin, insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were evaluated using backward elimination separately in women pre- and postmenopausal at blood collection. Improvement in discrimination was evaluated as the change in concordance statistic (C-statistic) from a modified Gail or Pfeiffer risk score alone versus models, including the biomarkers and risk score. Internal validation with bootstrapping (1,000-fold) was used to adjust for overfitting.
Results: Among women postmenopausal at blood collection, estradiol, testosterone, and SHBG were selected into the prediction models. For breast cancer overall, model discrimination after including biomarkers was 5.3 percentage points higher than the modified Gail model alone, and 3.4 percentage points higher than the Pfeiffer model alone, after accounting for overfitting. Discrimination was more markedly improved for estrogen receptor-positive disease (percentage point change in C-statistic: 7.2, Gail; 4.8, Pfeiffer). We observed no improvement in discrimination among women premenopausal at blood collection.Conclusions: Integration of hormone measurements in clinical risk prediction models may represent a strategy to improve breast cancer risk stratification. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4181-9. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28246273     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  11 in total

1.  Determinants of prolactin in postmenopausal Chinese women in Singapore.

Authors:  Tiffany A Katz; Anna H Wu; Frank Z Stanczyk; Renwei Wang; Woon-Puay Koh; Jian-Min Yuan; Steffi Oesterreich; Lesley M Butler
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Prospective evaluation of a breast-cancer risk model integrating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in 15 cohorts from six countries.

Authors:  Amber N Hurson; Parichoy Pal Choudhury; Chi Gao; Anika Hüsing; Mikael Eriksson; Min Shi; Michael E Jones; D Gareth R Evans; Roger L Milne; Mia M Gaudet; Celine M Vachon; Daniel I Chasman; Douglas F Easton; Marjanka K Schmidt; Peter Kraft; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 9.685

Review 3.  Linking Physical Activity to Breast Cancer via Sex Steroid Hormones, Part 2: The Effect of Sex Steroid Hormones on Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Ann E Drummond; Christopher T V Swain; Kristy A Brown; Suzanne C Dixon-Suen; Leonessa Boing; Eline H van Roekel; Melissa M Moore; Tom R Gaunt; Roger L Milne; Dallas R English; Richard M Martin; Sarah J Lewis; Brigid M Lynch
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Validation of two US breast cancer risk prediction models in German women.

Authors:  Anika Hüsing; Anne S Quante; Jenny Chang-Claude; Krasimira Aleksandrova; Rudolf Kaaks; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Endogenous hormones and risk of invasive breast cancer in pre- and post-menopausal women: findings from the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Sandar Tin Tin; Gillian K Reeves; Timothy J Key
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Serena C Houghton; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.090

7.  Simplified Breast Risk Tool Integrating Questionnaire Risk Factors, Mammographic Density, and Polygenic Risk Score: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi; Peter Kraft; Chi Gao; Yi Mu; Christopher Scott; Stacey J Winham; Celine M Vachon; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.090

8.  Breast cancer risk prediction in women aged 35-50 years: impact of including sex hormone concentrations in the Gail model.

Authors:  Tess V Clendenen; Wenzhen Ge; Karen L Koenig; Yelena Afanasyeva; Claudia Agnoli; Louise A Brinton; Farbod Darvishian; Joanne F Dorgan; A Heather Eliassen; Roni T Falk; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Timothy J Key; Vittorio Krogh; Hazel B Nichols; Dale P Sandler; Minouk J Schoemaker; Patrick M Sluss; Malin Sund; Anthony J Swerdlow; Kala Visvanathan; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Mengling Liu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Inclusion of Plasma Prolactin Levels in Current Risk Prediction Models of Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Marike Gabrielson; Kumari Ubhayasekera; Bo Ek; Mikael Andersson Franko; Mikael Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Jonas Bergquist; Per Hall
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2018-12-04

10.  Addition of a polygenic risk score, mammographic density, and endogenous hormones to existing breast cancer risk prediction models: A nested case-control study.

Authors:  Xuehong Zhang; Megan Rice; Shelley S Tworoger; Bernard A Rosner; A Heather Eliassen; Rulla M Tamimi; Amit D Joshi; Sara Lindstrom; Jing Qian; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett; Peter Kraft; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.