Literature DB >> 3327677

Felodipine versus Moduretic. A double-blind parallel-group multicentre study.

B Krönig1, G Flygt.   

Abstract

In a double-blind parallel-group study 133 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomised to felodipine 5mg twice daily or Moduretic mite every morning after a run-in placebo period of 1 to 2 weeks. All previous antihypertensive therapy was withdrawn at the start of the run-in period. After 4 weeks the dose of felodipine was increased to 10mg twice daily, and Moduretic mite was replaced by Moduretic in patients with a diastolic blood pressure of greater than 80mm Hg. On the low dose, the supine blood pressure on felodipine was reduced by 24/14mm Hg from 174/105mm Hg, and on Moduretic mite by 19/11mm Hg from 171/103mm Hg. After the increase in dosage blood pressure was lowered further. There was no statistically significant difference in blood pressure reduction between the 2 groups. Severe adverse drug experiences (ADEs) were few and equally distributed. However, more felodipine patients were withdrawn because of ADEs. Potassium levels decreased and uric acid levels increased significantly in the Moduretic group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3327677     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198700343-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  13 in total

1.  Results of treatment in malignant hypertension: a seven-year experience in 94 cases.

Authors:  M HARINGTON; P KINCAID-SMITH; J McMICHAEL
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1959-11-14

2.  Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1970-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1967-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Treatment of essential hypertension with felodipine in combination with a diuretic.

Authors:  T Hedner; O Samuelsson; E Sjögren; D Elmfeldt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Felodipine versus hydrochlorothiazide as an addition to a beta-blocker in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  H Borgmästars; B Forsén; J Tuomilehto; R Hellebø; P O Walle; H M Nielsen; E Nielsen; O Winkel; E Steiness; H Ibsen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Effects of felodipine on rest and exercise heart rate and blood pressure in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  A R Lorimer; H M McAlpine; A P Rae; I A Simpson; M P Barbour; E A Forret; T W Hill; T D Lawrie
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Acute diuretic/natriuretic properties of felodipine in man.

Authors:  B Edgar; B Bengtsson; D Elmfeldt; P Lundborg; G Nyberg; S Raner; O Rönn
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Felodipine versus prazosin as an addition to a beta-blocker in the treatment of essential hypertension. The Australian Multicentre Study.

Authors:  B Jackson; T O Morgan; J Gibson; A Anderson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Acute haemodynamic effects of felodipine during beta blockade in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  W Culling; M S Ruttley; D J Sheridan
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1984-10

10.  Felodipine vs hydralazine: a controlled trial as third line therapy in hypertension. Cooperative Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Felodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Authors:  E Saltiel; A G Ellrodt; J P Monk; M S Langley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Control of blood pressure in hypertensive patients with felodipine extended release or nifedipine retard.

Authors:  W A Littler
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Tolerability and efficacy of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide compared with amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  R Saini; M Romanini; L Mos
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Comparison of once daily felodipine 10 mg ER and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  W Koenig; M Sund; L Binner; R Hehr; J Rosenthal; V Hombach
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.