Literature DB >> 2894971

Felodipine versus prazosin as an addition to a beta-blocker in the treatment of essential hypertension. The Australian Multicentre Study.

B Jackson1, T O Morgan, J Gibson, A Anderson.   

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of felodipine and prazosin were compared in a double-blind randomised parallel group study of 100 patients with moderately severe essential hypertension, treated concomitantly with a beta-blocking drug. After a 2- to 8-week run in phase (beta-blocking drug plus placebo), patients with a diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 95mm Hg were randomly given felodipine (n = 50) or prazosin (n = 50). After an initial dose of either felodipine 2.5mg bid or prazosin 0.5mg bid for 3 days, the drugs were titrated at 2-week intervals (felodipine 5, 10, 20mg bid, prazosin 1, 2, 4mg bid) if the supine diastolic blood pressure was greater than or equal to 90mm Hg. Treatment was continued for 8 weeks. Baseline supine blood pressures of each group were similar (177/104mm Hg, felodipine; 176/103mm Hg, prazosin). At week 6, supine blood pressures in the felodipine group were 144/82mm Hg and 161/90 in the prazosin group. The reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly greater for the felodipine group than the prazosin group in both the supine and standing positions at all visits after baseline. At 8 weeks, supine diastolic blood pressure less than 90mm Hg was achieved in more patients in the felodipine (36/47) than in the prazosin group (20/43, p less than 0.01). The total number of adverse reactions was similar in both groups. During active therapy, a greater number of patients experienced vascular adverse reactions (oedema and flushing) with felodipine (23) than with prazosin (12). Most events were mild and did not necessitate withdrawal from therapy. There were no clinically significant changes in laboratory variables in either treatment group. Felodipine was an effective, well tolerated hypotensive agent when used concomitantly with a beta-blocking drug. In the doses used it was more effective than prazosin at reducing blood pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2894971     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198700343-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  12 in total

1.  Treatment of essential hypertension with felodipine in combination with a diuretic.

Authors:  T Hedner; O Samuelsson; E Sjögren; D Elmfeldt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Felodipine kinetics in healthy men.

Authors:  B Edgar; C G Regårdh; G Johnsson; L Johansson; P Lundborg; I Löfberg; O Rönn
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Felodipine--a new vasodilator, in addition to beta-receptor blockade in hypertension.

Authors:  D Elmfeldt; T Hedner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Vasodilating drugs: contrasting haemodynamic effects.

Authors:  R C Tarazi; H P Dustan; E L Bravo; A P Niarchos
Journal:  Clin Sci Mol Med Suppl       Date:  1976-12

5.  Vascular selectivity of felodipine.

Authors:  B Ljung
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Antihypertensive effects of felodipine compared with placebo.

Authors:  D Elmfeldt; T Hedner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Felodipine can replace minoxidil in the treatment of refractory hypertension.

Authors:  D MacLeod; C G Wathen; L Tucker; E A Forret; T W Hill; A L Muir
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1985-12

8.  Haemodynamic effects of a new vasodilator drug, felodipine, in healthy subjects.

Authors:  G Johnsson; G Murray; A Tweddel; I Hutton
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Felodipine. A calcium-inhibiting vasodilator in refractory hypertension.

Authors:  O K Andersson; G Granérus; T Hedner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Felodipine in hypertension.

Authors:  P J Mace; T J Stallard; W A Littler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on the benefit-risk balance of felodipine in hypertension.

Authors:  D Elmfeldt; S Westerling
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Felodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Authors:  E Saltiel; A G Ellrodt; J P Monk; M S Langley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Felodipine in combination with a beta-adrenoceptor blocker as an effective substitute for triple therapy in severe hypertension. The Australian Felodipine Multicentre Study Group.

Authors:  D B Frewin; P Aldons; L L Wilson; E F O'Sullivan; R N Wyndham; J Karrasch; J Agar; B B Singh; B Jackson; P F Atkins
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Felodipine versus Moduretic. A double-blind parallel-group multicentre study.

Authors:  B Krönig; G Flygt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  The efficacy and tolerability of long-term felodipine treatment in hypertension. The Scandinavian Multicenter Group.

Authors:  H Ibsen; B Westberg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Hormonal and blood pressure responses to tilting in beta-blocked essential hypertension treated with felodipine or prazosin.

Authors:  B Jackson; B P McGrath; C I Johnston
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Comparison of once daily felodipine 10 mg ER and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  W Koenig; M Sund; L Binner; R Hehr; J Rosenthal; V Hombach
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.