| Literature DB >> 33276760 |
Kirsten Jade Cromie1, Diane Erin Threapleton1, Charles Jonathan Peter Snart1, Elizabeth Taylor1, Dan Mason2, Barry Wright3, Brian Kelly2, Stephen Reid4, Rafaq Azad2, Claire Keeble5, Amanda H Waterman6, Sarah Meadows7, Amanda McKillion7, Nisreen A Alwan8,9, Janet Elizabeth Cade10, Nigel A B Simpson11, Paul M Stewart12, Michael Zimmermann13, John Wright2, Dagmar Waiblinger2, Mark Mon-Williams6, Laura J Hardie1, Darren Charles Greenwood14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal iodine requirements increase during pregnancy to supply thyroid hormones essential for fetal brain development. Maternal iodine deficiency can lead to hypothyroxinemia, a reduced fetal supply of thyroid hormones which, in the first trimester, has been linked to an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the child. No study to date has explored the direct link between maternal iodine deficiency and diagnosis of ASD in offspring.Entities:
Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder; Deficiency; Fetal development; Iodine; Pregnancy; Thyroid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33276760 PMCID: PMC7718710 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02440-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Maternal characteristics according to urinary iodine to creatinine ratio
| Iodine-to-creatinine ratio (cohort split into thirds) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All participants | lower third | middle third | higher third | |
| I:Cr (μg/g), median (range) | 83 | 59·5 (< 67) | 83·1 (67 to 105) | 121·9 (> 105) |
| N | 6973 | 2325 | 2324 | 2324 |
| I:Cr (μg/g), geometric mean (95% CI) | 86·0 (85·0 to 87·2) | 48·6 (48·1 to 49·2) | 83·4 (82·9 to 83·8) | 154·9 (154·9 to 159·3) |
| I:Cr (μg/g), median (IQR) | 83·1 (59·3 to 121·0) | 51·5 (42·8 to 59·5) | 83·1 (74·4 to 93·3) | 145·7 (121·0 to 185·9) |
| UIC (μg/L), geometric mean (95% CI) | 70·8 (69·6 to 72·1) | 45·9 (44·6 to 47·2) | 69·9 (68·1 to 71·8) | 110·6 (107·7 to 113·7) |
| UIC (μg/L), median (IQR) | 76·3 (44·7 to 120·2) | 52·1 (29·0 to 78·1) | 77·4 (47·4 to 111·4) | 117·8 (72·0 to 178·9) |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 27·2 (5·6) | 26·5 (5·5) | 27·3 (5·6) | 27·9 (5·6) |
| BMI (kg/M2), mean (SD) | 25·9 (5·5) | 26·5 (5·7) | 25·9 (5·4) | 25·2 (5·1) |
| Socio-economic status† | ||||
| Least deprived and most educated | 1313 (21) | 323 (16) | 456 (22) | 534 (26) |
| Employed, not materially deprived | 1299 (21) | 353 (17) | 458 (22) | 488 (23) |
| Employed, no access to money | 966 (16) | 338 (16) | 313 (15) | 315 (15) |
| Receives benefits, not materially deprived | 1671 (27) | 666 (32) | 527 (26) | 478 (23) |
| Most economically deprived | 954 (15) | 378 (19) | 304 (15) | 272 (13) |
| Ethnic background, n (%) | ||||
| White British & European | 3020 (43) | 847 (36) | 1061 (46) | 1112 (48) |
| Pakistani | 2951 (43) | 1112 (48) | 951 (41) | 888 (38) |
| Other (Black, Indian, mixed, other) | 964 (14) | 353 (15) | 299 (13) | 312 (14) |
| Parity | ||||
| 0 | 3196 (46) | 1015 (44) | 1055 (46) | 1126 (49) |
| 1 | 1896 (27) | 617 (27) | 640 (27) | 639 (27) |
| 2 | 1075 (15) | 376 (16) | 363 (16) | 336 (15) |
| 3+ | 806 (12) | 317 (14) | 266 (11) | 223 (10) |
| Health and lifestyle in pregnancy | ||||
| Gestational diabetes, n (%) | 525 (8) | 165 (7) | 174 (8) | 186 (8) |
| Pre-pregnancy hypertension, n (%) | 50 (1) | 21 (1) | 17 (1) | 12 (1) |
| Pregnancy-induced hypertension, n (%) | 383 (5) | 128 (5) | 127 (5) | 128 (6) |
| Preeclampsia, n (%) | 181 (3) | 64 (3) | 56 (2) | 61 (3) |
| Drank any alcohol, n (%) | 1323 (19) | 386 (17) | 476 (20) | 461 (20) |
| Smoked, n (%) | 1014 (15) | 321 (14) | 366 (16) | 327 (14) |
| Iodine-containing supplements, n (%) | 1036 (15) | 134 (6) | 279 (12) | 623 (27) |
| Total fish intakea (g/d), mean (SD) | 23·8 (29·3) | 20·9 (28·3) | 25·3 (30·8) | 25·3 (28·4) |
| Eat 5 fruit/vegetables per daya, n (%) | ||||
| Always | 441 (18) | 128 (15) | 164 (20) | 149 (19) |
| Sometimes | 1782 (75) | 628 (77) | 595 (73) | 559 (75) |
| Never | 154 (6) | 59 (7) | 52 (6) | 43 (6) |
Abbreviations: BMI Body mass index, CI Confidence intervals, I:Cr Urinary iodine to creatinine ratio, IQR Interquartile range, SD Standard deviation, UIC Urinary iodine concentration
aData from women who were asked about diet in pregnancy (n = 2202)
†See definitions in Supplemental Table S3
Observed number of cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) both for the cohort as a whole (n = 92) and according to maternal iodine-to-creatinine ratio (I:Cr). In addition to the modelled predicted probability of a diagnosis of ASD (95% CIs) at the 25th, 50th and 75th centiles of I:Cr, for ‘average’ participantsa
| Iodine-to-creatinine ratio | (n) | Observed cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (n) (percent) | Probability of a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (percent) (95%CIs) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All participants: | 6973 | 92 (1·3%) | |
| Lower third: 59·5, (0·7 to 67) | 2325 | 28 (1·2%) | 1·0 (0·3 to 1·7) |
| Middle third: 83·1, (67 to 105) | 2324 | 27 (1·2%) | 1·1 (0·4 to 1·8) |
| Higher third: 121·9, (> 105) | 2324 | 37 (1·6%) | 1·5 (0·5 to 2·4) |
a ‘Average’ participants were specified according to the largest categories or mean cohort values. Predicted estimates represent an average birth, not specified by child’s sex - related to participants who are primiparous, white ethnic background, ‘Employed and not materially deprived’, did not smoke, drink, were of mean age and an average BMI
Fig. 1Estimated risk of an autism spectrum disorder for children (aged 8 to 12 years) of typical mothers, across a range of maternal I:Cr concentrations (μg/g). Histograms illustrate the distribution of iodine concentrations and although the figures are curtailed at 300 μg/g, the splines (solid line) and 95% CIs (dashed lines) were drawn using data from all participants. Splines were drawn after adjustment for confounders (details in Supplemental Table S4). CIs are particularly wide for very low values of Urinary Iodine/Creatinine. This reflects the very small numbers of women in our sample with extremely low intakes of iodine (only 3·7% of participants have an I:Cr < 35 μg/g) and does not rule out the potential for a more visible trend in more severely deficient populations. The spline position in these figures illustrates the predicted estimate for typical participants (primiparous, white ethnic background, ‘Employed and not materially deprived’, did not smoke, drink or experience complications in pregnancy, of mean age and average BMI