| Literature DB >> 33274238 |
Noritaka Sawada1, Kei Adachi1, Nobuhisa Nakamura2, Megumi Miyabe2, Mizuho Ito2, Shuichiro Kobayashi1, Shin-Ichi Miyajima1, Yuki Suzuki1, Takeshi Kikuchi1, Makoto Mizutani3, Taku Toriumi3, Masaki Honda3, Akio Mitani1, Tatsuaki Matsubara2, Keiko Naruse2.
Abstract
Periodontitis is one of the diabetic complications due to its high morbidity and severity in patients with diabetes. The prevention of periodontitis is especially important in diabetic patients because the relationship between diabetes and periodontitis is bidirectional. Here, we evaluated the impacts of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist liraglutide on the amelioration of periodontitis. Five-wk-old Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (n = 30) were divided into 3 groups: normal, periodontitis, and periodontitis with liraglutide treatment groups. Periodontitis was induced by ligature around the maxillary second molar in SD rats. Half of the rats were administered liraglutide for 2 weeks. Periodontitis was evaluated by histological staining, gene expressions of inflammatory cytokines in gingiva, and microcomputed tomography. Periodontitis increased inflammatory cell infiltration, macrophage accumulation, and gene expressions of tumor necrosis factor-α and inducible nitric oxide synthase in the gingiva, all of which were ameliorated by liraglutide. Liraglutide decreased M1 macrophages but did not affect M2 macrophages in periodontitis. Moreover, ligature-induced alveolar bone resorption was ameliorated by liraglutide. Liraglutide treatment also reduced osteoclasts on the alveolar bone surface. These results highlight the beyond glucose-lowering effects of liraglutide on the treatment of periodontitis.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33274238 PMCID: PMC7695495 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8843310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Res Impact factor: 4.011
Figure 1Histological evaluation of the gingiva. Liraglutide decreased the inflammatory cell invasion in periodontitis. (a) Schematic images of periodontal tissue with (periodontitis) and without (normal) ligation. The squares represent the parts shown in the below figures. (b) Upper panels: H&E staining of the periodontal tissues around the tooth 14 days after ligation. Lower panels: detection of iNOS-positive inflammatory cells in the gingiva. The black arrows mark iNOS-positive inflammatory cells. Scalebar = 50 μm. (c) Quantification of iNOS-positive inflammatory cells in the gingiva. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Body weights and blood glucose levels in normal, periodontitis, and liraglutide-treated periodontitis rats.
| Variable | Normal ( | Periodontitis ( |
| Periodontitis + liraglutide ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment | |||||
| Body weight (g) | 191.0 ± 3.6 | 188.0 ± 7.7 | >0.999 | 188.0 ± 5.9 | >0.999 |
|
| |||||
| Posttreatment | |||||
| Body weight (g) | 313.1 ± 11.6 | 309.3 ± 9.7 | >0.999 | 294.1 ± 8.3 | 0.705 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.9 ± 1.3 | 5.3 ± 1.0 | >0.999 | 5.8 ± 1.4 | >0.999 |
Pretreatment: the day of the ligature. Posttreatment: two weeks after the ligature with or without liraglutide. Data are means ± standarderror. P value versus normal rats.
Figure 2Liraglutide attenuated the gene expressions of inflammatory cytokines induced by periodontitis. Gene expressions of iNOS (Nos2), TNF-α (Tnf), CD11c (Itgax), and CD206 (Mrc1) were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 5). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 3Liraglutide reduced bone resorption in rats with periodontitis. (a) Generated three-dimensional images of alveolar bone. Scalebar = 1 mm. (b) Bone resorption was calculated as the distance from the buccal cementoenamel junction to the alveolar bone crest. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 8-10). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 4Evaluation of osteoclast formation and osteoblast activity on the surface of alveolar bone. Histologic sections were obtained 14 days after ligation and administration of liraglutide. (a) Upper panels: pattern diagrams of anatomical aspects of alveolar tissues. T: tooth; G: gingiva; AB: alveolar bone. Middle panels: TRAP-positive osteoclast localization in the second molar of the maxillary frontal sections; the black arrows mark the TRAP-positive cells. Scalebar = 100 μm. Lower panels: ALP staining of the same part as upper panels. Scalebar = 100 μm. (b) Quantification of TRAP-positive cells (osteoclast) (nuclei of ≧3). (c) Quantification of ALP (activity of osteoblasts) by ImageJ. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01.