Literature DB >> 33273972

Diagnostic accuracy of true fast imaging with steady-state precession, MR pulmonary angiography and volume-interpolated body examination for pulmonary embolism compared with CT pulmonary angiography.

Qing Fu1,2, Qiguang Cheng1,2, Xiangchuang Kong1,2, Hui Ma1,2, Ziqiao Lei1,2.   

Abstract

The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) sequences for displaying different levels of pulmonary artery involvement in pulmonary embolism (PE) has rarely been reported but is essential for critically ill and emergency patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of true fast imaging with steady-state precession (true FISP), MR pulmonary angiography (MRPA) and volume-interpolated body examination (VIBE) for PE detection in comparison to CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), which is the reference standard. A total of 21 patients with confirmed deep venous thrombosis suspected of having PE were enrolled. Emboli were evaluated on per-patient and per-vessel bases. The evidence of PE on a per-vessel basis was classified into central, lobar and segmental levels, and 27 vessel segments per patient were analyzed for a total of 567 vessel segments in all patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to compare differences in sequences. A total of 158 pulmonary vessels were involved with emboli on CTPA, 58 of which were identified by true FISP, 63 by MRPA and 94 by VIBE. On per-patient and per-vessel bases, the sensitivity was 81.3 and 36.7%, respectively, for true FISP, 82.4 and 56.3%, respectively, for MRPA, and 94.4 and 68.1%, respectively, for VIBE; the specificity was 80.0 and 99.8%, respectively, for true FISP, 100 and 99.2%, respectively, for MRPA, and 100 and 99.2%, respectively, for VIBE. The respective PPV was 92.9 and 98.3% for true FISP, 100 and 95.5% for MRPA, 100 and 96.9% for VIBE. The NPV was 57.1 and 80.3%, respectively, for true FISP, 50.0 and 88.2%, respectively, for MRPA, and 75.0 and 89.8%, respectively, for VIBE. In conclusion, enhanced VIBE surpassed the other two sequences in revealing PE, particularly in segmental analysis, which is essential for emergency patients who have contraindications for receiving iodinated contrast and those who have concerns about the ionizing radiation. Copyright: © Fu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT angiography; MR angiography; MRI; pulmonary embolism; volume-interpolated body examination

Year:  2020        PMID: 33273972      PMCID: PMC7706389          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.9474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  32 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: A bivariate meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Squizzato; Fulvio Pomero; Attilio Allione; Roberto Priotto; Nicoletta Riva; Menno V Huisman; Frederikus A Klok; Paul D Stein; Luigina Guasti; Luigi Fenoglio; Francesco Dentali; Walter Ageno
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.944

2.  Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Paul D Stein; Sarah E Fowler; Lawrence R Goodman; Alexander Gottschalk; Charles A Hales; Russell D Hull; Kenneth V Leeper; John Popovich; Deborah A Quinn; Thomas A Sos; H Dirk Sostman; Victor F Tapson; Thomas W Wakefield; John G Weg; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Contrast nephropathy following computed tomography angiography of the chest for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.

Authors:  A M Mitchell; J A Kline
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3-T for acute pulmonary embolism detection: comparison with multidetector CT angiography.

Authors:  Long Jiang Zhang; Song Luo; Benjamin M Yeh; Chang Sheng Zhou; Chun Xiang Tang; Yan'e Zhao; Lin Li; Ling Zheng; Wei Huang; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 5.  Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: new computed tomography applications.

Authors:  Konstantin Nikolaou; Sven Thieme; Wieland Sommer; Thorsten Johnson; Maximilian F Reiser
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Experience in 207 combined MRI examinations for acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Alexander Kluge; Clemens Mueller; Johannes Strunk; Uwe Lange; Georg Bachmann
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pulmonary Embolism: Diagnostic Accuracy of Unenhanced MR and Influence in Mortality Rates.

Authors:  Lilian Pasin; Matheus Zanon; Jose Moreira; Ana Luiza Moreira; Guilherme Watte; Edson Marchiori; Bruno Hochhegger
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 2.584

8.  Combined magnetic resonance imaging of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary arteries after a single injection of a blood pool contrast agent.

Authors:  Andreas Hansch; Stefan Betge; Gunther Poehlmann; Steffi Neumann; Pascal Baltzer; Alexander Pfeil; Matthias Waginger; Joachim Boettcher; Werner A Kaiser; Gunter Wolf; Hans-Joachim Mentzel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing i.v. contrast media in children and adults.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; James H Ellis; Richard H Cohan; Peter J Strouse; Sophia C Jan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Feasibility of detecting pulmonary embolism using noncontrast MRI.

Authors:  C S Mudge; T T Healey; M K Atalay; J A Pezzullo
Journal:  ISRN Radiol       Date:  2012-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.