| Literature DB >> 33273843 |
Rafael Torres-Valadez1,2, Omar Ramos-Lopez3, Kevin J Frías Delgadillo1, Aurelio Flores-García1, Esaú Rojas Carrillo4, Pedro Aguiar-García1, J Antonio Bernal Pérez4, Erika Martinez-Lopez5, J Alfredo Martínez6,7, Eloy A Zepeda-Carrillo1,8.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze clinically relevant interactions between the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε2, ε3 and ε4 alleles and nutritional factors on glycemic control and lipid levels in a cohort of type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients from western Mexico. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of the cohort of T2D patients, a total of 224 individuals were selected for interaction studies. Clinical and anthropometric data were obtained from pre-designed medical records. Dietary intake was assessed by validated three-day food consumption records. Biochemical measurements were determined by automated methods. APOE genotyping was performed by a real-time allelic discrimination assay. Gene-diet interactions were tested by corrected multiple linear regression analyses, which were adjusted by potential confounding factors such as age, sex, energy intake, BMI and anti-hyperglycemic therapy (Metformin, Glibenclamide or Insulin), and years with T2D.Entities:
Keywords: APOE alleles; gene–nutrient interactions; glycemic control; personalized medicine; type 2 diabetes; ω-6:ω-3 PUFA ratio
Year: 2020 PMID: 33273843 PMCID: PMC7705254 DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S277952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmgenomics Pers Med ISSN: 1178-7066
Characteristics of the T2D Patients According to APOE Alleles
| Variables | ε2 n=13 | ε3 n=166 | ε4 n=45 | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 54.8±9.9 | 58.0±11.2 | 57.0±13.4 | 0.575 |
| Sex (F/M) | 8/5 | 111/55 | 29/16 | 0.896 |
| Years with T2D | 9.9±8.9 | 8.5±7.7 | 8.0±9.4 | 0.775 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.9±6.7 | 29.9±5.5 | 29.1±5.6 | 0.680 |
| Waist (cm) | 97.3±11.4 | 100.5±11.2 | 98.9±14.8 | 0.547 |
| Total body fat (%) | 33.1±8.3 | 34.1±7.8 | 34.1±8.0 | 0.921 |
| Normal weight, n (%) | 3 (23.0) | 25 (15.1) | 13 (28.9) | 0.224 |
| Overweight, n (%) | 5 (38.5) | 62 (37.3) | 14 (31.1) | |
| Obesity, n (%) | 5 (38.5) | 79 (47.6) | 18 (40.0) | |
| SBP (mmHg) | 113±15.5 | 119±13.7 | 118±9.5 | 0.267 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 74±9.0 | 75±7.0 | 74±7.2 | 0.887 |
Notes: Values are presented as means ± standard deviations. The one-way ANOVA test for continuous variables and Chi-square for categorical variable were the statistical methods.
Abbreviations: F, female; M, males; T2D, type 2 diabetes; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
Nutrient Intakes According to APOE Alleles
| Nutrient | Reference Values | ε2 | ε 3 | ε 4 | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total energy (Kcal/d) | – | 1575±455 | 1553±425 | 1375±345 | 0.037a |
| Total carbohydrates (%/d) | 50–60 | 47.6±13.2 | 50.0±9.3 | 51.5±10.2 | 0.400 |
| Total protein (%/d) | 15 | 17.7±3.2 | 17.6±3.0 | 18.3±4.2 | 0.415 |
| Total fat (%/d) | <30 | 34.3±8.5 | 30.7±6.1 | 31.4±10.7 | 0.235 |
| SFA (%/d) | <7 | 9.4±2.9 | 8.6±2.5 | 8.4±2.9 | 0.480 |
| MUFA (%/d) | 10–15 | 11.8±3.7 | 10.1±2.5 | 10.5±5.4 | 0.162 |
| PUFA (%/d) | 10 | 8.2±2.6 | 7.6±2.3 | 8.1±3.8 | 0.479 |
| ω6 (g/d) | – | 8.3±3.0 | 8.1±3.4 | 8.0±4.1 | 0.953 |
| ω3 (g/d) | – | 0.8±0.3 | 0.8±0.9 | 0.7±0.3 | 0.569 |
| ω6:ω3 ratio/d | 5:1 | 12:1 | 12:1 | 13:1 | 0.422 |
| Cholesterol (mg/d) | <200 | 329±137 | 265±149 | 267±177 | 0.350 |
| Fiber (g/d) | >30 | 20.1±7.0 | 19.5±6.7 | 18.1±8.2 | 0.456 |
| Vitamin C (mg/d) | 60 | 109.6±94.1 | 76.7±82.5 | 66.5±71.0 | 0.243 |
| Vitamin E (IU/d) | 10 | 3.9±3.2 | 3.8±3.7 | 2.9±2.2 | 0.283 |
| Zn (mg/d) | 15 | 8.8±3.1 | 8.9±4.2 | 7.8±3.0 | 0.303 |
| Mg (mg/d) | 350 | 298.3±65.7 | 283.2±82.6 | 266.4±103.8 | 0.393 |
| Se (µg/d) | 55–70 | 68.2±29.3 | 71.0±28.3 | 65.5±27.4 | 0.507 |
Notes: Values are presented as means ± standard deviations. aBy post hoc tests: Total energy: ε3 vs ε4, p = 0.015. The one-way ANOVA test for continuous variables was the statistical method.
Abbreviations: SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; ω6, omega-6; ω3, omega-3; Zn, zinc; Mg, magnesium; Se, selenium.
Biochemical Profile According to APOE Alleles
| Biochemical Variables | Reference Values | ε2 | ε3 | ε4 | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | <200 | 162.6±35.8 | 183.7±41.6 | 183.1±31.6 | 0.180 |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | >50 | 47.5±11.9 | 48.9±14.3 | 45.6±14.1 | 0.375 |
| Non-HDL-c (mg/dL) | <130 | 115.2±33.8 | 134.9±39.6 | 137.2±26.9 | 0.153 |
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | <100 | 85.4±25.1 | 102.4±32.7 | 109.5±26.8 | 0.050 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | <150 | 148.4±62.0 | 163.7±90.3 | 154.4±74.5 | 0.702 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | <110 | 119.9±25.5 | 161.5±71.8 | 134.2±45.9 | 0.008a |
| TyG index | <8.3 | 8.6±0.8 | 8.9±0.7 | 8.9±0.6 | 0.466 |
| HbA1c (%) | <6.5 | 6.6±0.6 | 7.8±2.0 | 7.2±1.7 | 0.030a |
| ALT (IU/L) | <30 | 40.8±18.0 | 38.9±19.3 | 34.7±12.7 | 0.434 |
| AST (IU/L) | <30 | 28.5±13.1 | 32.7±15.1 | 27.0±8.6 | 0.085 |
Notes: Values are presented as means ± standard deviations. aBy post hoc tests: Glucose: ε3 vs ε2, p <0.001; ε3 vs ε4, p=0.007. HbA1c: ε3 vs ε2, p <0.001. The one-way ANOVA test for continuous variables was the statistical method.
Abbreviations: HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Non-HDL-c, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TyG index, triglycerides-glucose index; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase.
Figure 1Impact of APOE alleles-by-diet interactions on lipid and glycemic phenotypes. (A) APOE-MUFA intake interaction regarding Total cholesterol. (B) APOE-MUFA intake interaction in relation to Non-HDL-c. (C) APOE-MUFA intake interaction concerning LDL-c. (D) APOE ω6:ω3 ratio interaction regarding HbA1c. Interactions were adjusted by age, sex, BMI, energy intake, drinking, smoking, anti-hyperglycemic therapies (Metformin, Glibenclamide or Insulin) and years with T2D as covariates. MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids.