| Literature DB >> 33273497 |
Anthony Patrizz1, Antonio Dono1,2, Soheil Zorofchian1,2, Gabriella Hines2, Takeshi Takayasu1,2, Nuruddin Husein1, Yoshihiro Otani1, Octavio Arevalo3, H Alex Choi1, Jude Savarraj1, Nitin Tandon1, Bhanu P Ganesh4, Balveen Kaur1, Louise D McCullough4, Leomar Y Ballester5,6,7,8, Yoshua Esquenazi9,10,11,12.
Abstract
The gut microbiome is fundamental in neurogenesis processes. Alterations in microbial constituents promote inflammation and immunosuppression. Recently, in immune-oncology, specific microbial taxa have been described to enhance the effects of therapeutic modalities. However, the effects of microbial dysbiosis on glioma are still unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of glioma development and Temozolomide (TMZ) on fecal microbiome in mice and humans. C57BL/6 mice were implanted with GL261/Sham and given TMZ/Saline. Fecal samples were collected longitudinally and analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Fecal samples were collected from healthy controls as well as glioma patients at diagnosis, before and after chemoradiation. Compared to healthy controls, mice and glioma patients demonstrated significant differences in beta diversity, Firmicutes/Bacteroides (F/B) ratio, and increase of Verrucomicrobia phylum and Akkermansia genus. These changes were not observed following TMZ in mice. TMZ treatment in the non-tumor bearing mouse-model diminished the F/B ratio, increase Muribaculaceae family and decrease Ruminococcaceae family. Nevertheless, there were no changes in Verrucomicrobia/Akkermansia. Glioma development leads to gut dysbiosis in a mouse-model, which was not observed in the setting of TMZ. These findings seem translational to humans and warrant further study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33273497 PMCID: PMC7713059 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77919-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A–E) Glioma induces dysbiosis in the mouse gut microbiome. Comparison of Tumor/Saline 1st and 4th samples (n = 6). (A) Beta diversity Weighted Bray–Curtis PCoA. (B) Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio. (C) Relative abundance taxa summary at the Phylum level. (D) Relative abundance of Akkermansiaceae at the family level. (E) Relative abundance of Akkermansia at the genus level. (F–J) Temozolomide reshapes the Glioma-induced Dysbiosis. Comparison of Tumor/TMZ 2nd and 4th samples (n = 8). (F) Beta diversity Weighted Bray–Curtis PCoA. (G) Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio. (H) Relative abundance taxa summary at the Phylum level. (I) Relative abundance of Akkermansiaceae at the family level. (J) Relative abundance of Akkermansia at the genus level.
Figure 2(A–F) Temozolomide alters the mouse gut microbiome. Comparison of Sham/TMZ 2nd and 4th samples (n = 7). (A) Observed OTU and the Shannon alpha diversity index. (B) Beta diversity Weighted Bray–Curtis PCoA. (C) Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio. (D) Relative abundance taxa summary at the Phylum level. (E) Relative abundance taxa abundance at the family level. (F) Relative abundance of Akkermansia at the genus level.
Clinical Characteristics and Demographics of Glioma Patients (N = 53).
| Variable | N (%) |
|---|---|
| 18–54 | 26 (49) |
| > 55 | 27 (51) |
| Male | 34 (64) |
| Female | 19 (36) |
| White/Caucasian | 26 (49) |
| African American | 6 (12) |
| Hispanic | 15 (28) |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 5 (9) |
| Others | 1 (2) |
| 70 or more | 31 (58) |
| < 70 | 22 (42) |
| < 18.5 | 3 (6) |
| 18.5–24.9 | 12 (23) |
| 25–29.9 | 21 (40) |
| 30–34.9 | 9 (17) |
| 35–39.9 | 4 (7) |
| > 40 | 4 (7) |
| Frontal | 24 (45) |
| Parietal | 16 (30) |
| Temporal | 25 (47) |
| Occipital | 8 (15) |
| Insular/Paralimbic | 21 (40) |
| Brainstem, thalamus, and basal ganglia | 8 (15) |
| Intraventricular | 4 (7) |
| Butterfly | 4 (7) |
| Multifocal | 4 (7) |
| Glioblastoma IDH-wild type | 40 (75) |
| Glioblastoma IDH-mutant | 6 (12) |
| Anaplastic astrocytoma IDH-wild type | 1 (2.5) |
| Anaplastic oligodendroglioma IDH-mutant 1p19q co-deleted | 1 (2.5) |
| Diffuse astrocytoma IDH-wild type | 2 (4) |
| Diffuse astrocytoma IDH-mutant | 3 (6) |
| 16.4 -113.3 | 14 (26) |
| 113.3—178.9 | 13 (24.67) |
| 178.9 -219.3 | 13 (24.67) |
| 219.3–374.4 | 13 (24.67) |
| GTR | 19 (36) |
| NTR | 12 (23) |
| STR | 18 (34) |
| Biopsy | 4 (7) |
| Yes | 39 (74) |
| No | 11 (20) |
| Not available | 3 (6) |
| Yes | 39 (74) |
| No | 11 (20) |
| Not available | 3 (6) |
| Yes | 10 (19) |
| No | 42 (81) |
| Yes | 20 (38) |
| No | 33 (62) |
| Death | 5 (9) |
| Alive | 48 (91) |
KPS Karnofsky Performance Score, BMI body mass index, IDH isocitrate dehydrogenase, GTR gross-total resection, NTR near-total resection, STR Sub-total resection.
*More than one location was listed if the tumor involved more than one lobe.
**Volumetric analysis included the enhancing tumor, necrosis, and T2-Flair changes.
***Other treatments included: Depatuxizumab Mafodotin n = 5 (Clinical Trial), Bevacizumab n = 3, Novo TTF (Tumor Treating Fields) n = 3, Immunotherapy n = 2, CPT-11 n = 1, Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy—LITT n = 1.
Figure 3IDH-WT and IDH-Mut gliomas display different effects on the human gut microbiome. Comparison of patients' gut microbiome at diagnosis, based on IDH gene status (IDH-WT, n = 39 and IDH-Mut, n = 8) against controls (n = 21). (A,B) Observed OTU and the Shannon alpha diversity index between controls and IDH-WT or IDH-Mut gliomas patients. (C) Beta diversity Weighted Bray–Curtis PCoA of IDH-WT gliomas. (D) Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio of IDH-WT gliomas. (E) Beta diversity Weighted Bray–Curtis PCoA of IDH-Mut gliomas. (F) Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio of IDH-Mut gliomas. (G,H) Relative abundance taxa summary at the Phylum level of IDH-WT and IDH-Mut gliomas. (I) Relative abundance of IDH-WT glioma in Akkermansiaceae at the family level (J) Relative abundance of IDH-WT glioma in Akkermansia at the genus level. (K) Relative abundance of IDH-Mut glioma in Akkermansiaceae at the family level. (L) Relative abundance of IDH-WT glioma in Akkermansia at the genus level.
Figure 4Experimental design and stool sample collection. (A) Twenty-eight male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into four groups: Sham/ Saline (N = 7), Tumor/ Saline (N = 6), Sham/ TMZ (N = 7), and Tumor/ TMZ (N = 8). The tumor was implanted using GL261 mouse cells. Two weeks post tumor implantation, mice were treated orally by either saline or TMZ 25 mg/kg for three weeks, five days per week. Stool samples were collected periodically as depicted in the timeline. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curve using the Log-rank test of the 4 groups, in which mortality was significantly higher in the tumor/saline group (p < 0.001) compared to the other three groups.