Robert A Bray1, Jar-How Lee2, Peter Brescia3, Deepali Kumar4, Thoa Nong3, Remi Shih3, E Steve Woodle5, Jonathan S Maltzman5,6, Howard M Gebel1. 1. Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 2. Terasaki Innovation Center, Los Angeles, CA. 3. One Lambda Inc., Division of Thermo Fisher Scientific, West Hills, CA. 4. Transplant Infectious Diseases, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health, Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA. 6. VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients who develop COVID-19 may be at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Determining the status of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in both candidates and recipients will be important to understand the epidemiology and clinical course of COVID-19 in this population. While there are multiple tests to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, their performance is variable. Tests vary according to their platforms and the antigenic targets which make interpretation of the results challenging. Furthermore, for some assays, sensitivity and specificity are less than optimal. Additionally, currently available serological tests do not exclude the possibility that positive responses are due to cross reactive antibodies to community coronaviruses rather than SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: This study describes the development and validation of a high-throughput multiplex antibody detection assay. RESULTS: The multiplex assay has the capacity to identify, simultaneously, patient responses to 5 SARS-CoV-2 proteins, namely, the full spike protein, 3 individual domains of the spike protein (S1, S2, and receptor binding domain), and the nucleocapsid protein. The antibody response to the above proteins are SARS-CoV-2-specific, as antibodies against 4 common coronaviruses do not cross-react. CONCLUSIONS: This new assay provides a novel tool to interrogate the spectrum of immune responses to SAR-CoV-2 and is uniquely suitable for use in the transplant setting. Test configuration is essentially identical to the single antigen bead assays used in the majority of histocompatibility laboratories around the world and could easily be implemented into routine screening of transplant candidates and recipients.
BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients who develop COVID-19 may be at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Determining the status of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in both candidates and recipients will be important to understand the epidemiology and clinical course of COVID-19 in this population. While there are multiple tests to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, their performance is variable. Tests vary according to their platforms and the antigenic targets which make interpretation of the results challenging. Furthermore, for some assays, sensitivity and specificity are less than optimal. Additionally, currently available serological tests do not exclude the possibility that positive responses are due to cross reactive antibodies to community coronaviruses rather than SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: This study describes the development and validation of a high-throughput multiplex antibody detection assay. RESULTS: The multiplex assay has the capacity to identify, simultaneously, patient responses to 5 SARS-CoV-2 proteins, namely, the full spike protein, 3 individual domains of the spike protein (S1, S2, and receptor binding domain), and the nucleocapsid protein. The antibody response to the above proteins are SARS-CoV-2-specific, as antibodies against 4 common coronaviruses do not cross-react. CONCLUSIONS: This new assay provides a novel tool to interrogate the spectrum of immune responses to SAR-CoV-2 and is uniquely suitable for use in the transplant setting. Test configuration is essentially identical to the single antigen bead assays used in the majority of histocompatibility laboratories around the world and could easily be implemented into routine screening of transplant candidates and recipients.
Authors: Louise Benning; Christian Morath; Marie Bartenschlager; Christian Nusshag; Florian Kälble; Mirabel Buylaert; Matthias Schaier; Jörg Beimler; Katrin Klein; Julia Grenz; Paula Reichel; Asa Hidmark; Gerald Ponath; Maximilian Töllner; Marvin Reineke; Susanne Rieger; Burkhard Tönshoff; Paul Schnitzler; Martin Zeier; Caner Süsal; Ralf Bartenschlager; Claudius Speer Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Paolo Cravedi; Patrick Ahearn; Lin Wang; Tanuja Yalamarti; Susan Hartzell; Yorg Azzi; Madhav C Menon; Aditya Jain; Marzuq Billah; Marcelo Fernandez-Vina; Howard M Gebel; E Steve Woodle; Natalie S Haddad; Andrea Morrison-Porter; F Eun-Hyung Lee; Ignacio Sanz; Enver Akalin; Alin Girnita; Jonathan S Maltzman Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Louise Benning; Katrin Klein; Christian Morath; Marie Bartenschlager; Heeyoung Kim; Mirabel Buylaert; Marvin Reineke; Maximilian Töllner; Christian Nusshag; Florian Kälble; Paula Reichel; Paul Schnitzler; Martin Zeier; Caner Süsal; Ralf Bartenschlager; Matthias Schaier; Claudius Speer Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Lucrezia Furian; Francesco Paolo Russo; Gianluigi Zaza; Patrizia Burra; Susan Hartzell; Debora Bizzaro; Marianna Di Bello; Caterina Di Bella; Erica Nuzzolese; Clara Agnolon; Sander Florman; Meenakshi Rana; Jar-How Lee; Yesl Kim; Umberto Maggiore; Jonathan S Maltzman; Paolo Cravedi Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 8.786
Authors: Sophia Hober; Cecilia Hellström; Jennie Olofsson; Eni Andersson; Sofia Bergström; August Jernbom Falk; Shaghayegh Bayati; Sara Mravinacova; Ronald Sjöberg; Jamil Yousef; Lovisa Skoglund; Sara Kanje; Anna Berling; Anne-Sophie Svensson; Gabriella Jensen; Henric Enstedt; Delaram Afshari; Lan Lan Xu; Martin Zwahlen; Kalle von Feilitzen; Leo Hanke; Ben Murrell; Gerald McInerney; Gunilla B Karlsson Hedestam; Christofer Lendel; Robert G Roth; Ingmar Skoog; Elisabet Svenungsson; Tomas Olsson; Anna Fogdell-Hahn; Ylva Lindroth; Maria Lundgren; Kimia T Maleki; Nina Lagerqvist; Jonas Klingström; Rui Da Silva Rodrigues; Sandra Muschiol; Gordana Bogdanovic; Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr; Carina Eklund; Camilla Lagheden; Joakim Dillner; Åsa Sivertsson; Sebastian Havervall; Charlotte Thålin; Hanna Tegel; Elisa Pin; Anna Månberg; My Hedhammar; Peter Nilsson Journal: Clin Transl Immunology Date: 2021-07-19
Authors: Maximilian Töllner; Claudius Speer; Louise Benning; Marie Bartenschlager; Christian Nusshag; Christian Morath; Martin Zeier; Caner Süsal; Paul Schnitzler; Wilhelm Schmitt; Raoul Bergner; Ralf Bartenschlager; Hanns-Martin Lorenz; Matthias Schaier Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 4.241