Literature DB >> 33270984

Radiobiological effects of the interruption time with Monte Carlo Simulation on multiple fields in photon beams.

Hisashi Nakano1, Daisuke Kawahara2, Satoshi Tanabe1, Satoru Utsunomiya3, Takeshi Takizawa1,4, Madoka Sakai1, Hirotake Saito1, Atsushi Ohta1, Motoki Kaidu5, Hiroyuki Ishikawa5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The interruption time is the irradiation interruption that occurs at sites and operations such as the gantry, collimator, couch rotation, and patient setup within the field in radiotherapy. However, the radiobiological effect of prolonging the treatment time by the interruption time for tumor cells is little evaluated. We investigated the effect of the interruption time on the radiobiological effectiveness with photon beams based on a modified microdosimetric kinetic (mMK) model.
METHODS: The dose-mean lineal energy yD (keV/µm) of 6-MV photon beams was calculated by the particle and heavy ion transport system (PHITS). We set the absorbed dose to 2 or 8 Gy, and the interruption time (τ) was set to 1, 3, 5, 10, 30, and 60 min. The biological parameters such as α0, β0, and DNA repair constant rate (a + c) values were acquired from a human non-small-cell lung cancer cell line (NCI-H460) for the mMK model. We used two-field and four-field irradiation with a constant dose rate (3 Gy/min); the photon beams were paused for interruption time τ. We calculated the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) to evaluate the interruption time's effect compared with no interrupted as a reference.
RESULTS: The yD of 6-MV photon beams was 2.32 (keV/µm), and there was little effect by changing the water depth (standard deviation was 0.01). The RBE with four-field irradiation for 8 Gy was decreased to 0.997, 0.975, 0.900, and 0.836 τ = 1, 10, 30, 60 min, respectively. In addition, the RBE was affected by the repair constant rate (a + c) value, the greater the decrease in RBE with the longer the interruption time when the (a + c) value was large.
CONCLUSION: The ~10-min interruption of 6-MV photon beams did not significantly impact the radiobiological effectiveness, since the RBE decrease was <3%. Nevertheless, the RBE's effect on tumor cells was decreased about 30% by increasing the 60 min interruption time at 8 Gy with four-field irradiation. It is thus necessary to make the interruption time as short as possible.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulation; external photon beam; interruption time; microdosimetric kinetic model; sublethal damage repair

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33270984      PMCID: PMC7769402          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  32 in total

1.  Recovery from sublethal damage during intermittent exposures in cultured tumor cells: implications for dose modification in radiosurgery and IMRT.

Authors:  Yuta Shibamoto; Masato Ito; Chikao Sugie; Hiroyuki Ogino; Masaki Hara
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Microdosimetric study on influence of low energy photons on relative biological effectiveness under therapeutic conditions using 6 MV linac.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okamoto; Toshiyuki Kohno; Tatsuaki Kanai; Yuki Kase; Yoshitaka Matsumoto; Yoshiya Furusawa; Yukio Fujita; Hidetoshi Saitoh; Jun Itami
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A Monte Carlo approach to the microdosimetric kinetic model to account for dose rate time structure effects in ion beam therapy with application in treatment planning simulations.

Authors:  Lorenzo Manganaro; Germano Russo; Roberto Cirio; Federico Dalmasso; Simona Giordanengo; Vincenzo Monaco; Silvia Muraro; Roberto Sacchi; Anna Vignati; Andrea Attili
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A statistical theory of cell killing by radiation of varying linear energy transfer.

Authors:  R B Hawkins
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Radiation resistance of cancer stem cells: the 4 R's of radiobiology revisited.

Authors:  Frank Pajonk; Erina Vlashi; William H McBride
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.277

6.  Trajectory optimization for dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gregory Smyth; Jeffrey C Bamber; Philip M Evans; James L Bedford
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Dose compensation based on biological effectiveness due to interruption time for photon radiation therapy.

Authors:  Daisuke Kawahara; Hisashi Nakano; Akito Saito; Shuichi Ozawa; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Evaluation of the cell survival curve under radiation exposure based on the kinetics of lesions in relation to dose-delivery time.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsuya; Kaori Tsutsumi; Kohei Sasaki; Hiroyuki Date
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 9.  High-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for oral cavity cancer and oropharynx cancer.

Authors:  Alfredo Polo
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-01-13

10.  Effect of dose-delivery time for flattened and flattening filter-free photon beams based on microdosimetric kinetic model.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakano; Daisuke Kawahara; Kaoru Ono; Yukio Akagi; Yutaka Hirokawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.