Literature DB >> 33270415

Global Phosphoproteome Analysis Using High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry on a Hybrid Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer.

Laura K Muehlbauer1,2, Alexander S Hebert1,3, Michael S Westphall1,3, Evgenia Shishkova1,3, Joshua J Coon1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry is the premier tool for identifying and quantifying protein phosphorylation on a global scale. Analysis of phosphopeptides requires enrichment, and even after the samples remain highly complex and exhibit broad dynamic range of abundance. Achieving maximal depth of coverage for phosphoproteomics therefore typically necessitates offline liquid chromatography prefractionation, a time-consuming and laborious approach. Here, we incorporate a recently commercialized aerodynamic high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) device into the phosphoproteomic workflow. We characterize the effects of phosphorylation on the FAIMS separation, describe optimized compensation voltage settings for unlabeled phosphopeptides, and demonstrate the advantages of FAIMS-enabled gas-phase fractionation. Standard FAIMS single-shot analyses identified around 15-20% additional phosphorylation sites than control experiments without FAIMS. In comparison to liquid chromatography prefractionation, FAIMS experiments yielded similar or superior results when analyzing up to four discrete gas-phase fractions. Although using FAIMS led to a modest reduction in the precision of quantitative measurements when using label-free approaches, the data collected with FAIMS yielded a 26% increase in total reproducible measurements. Overall, we conclude that the new FAIMS technology is a valuable addition to any phosphoproteomic workflow, with greater benefits emerging from longer analyses and higher amounts of material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33270415      PMCID: PMC8051555          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  53 in total

1.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Enhanced detection of multiply phosphorylated peptides and identification of their sites of modification.

Authors:  Antoine Fleitz; Edward Nieves; Carlos Madrid-Aliste; Sarah J Fentress; L David Sibley; Louis M Weiss; Ruth Hogue Angeletti; Fa-Yun Che
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Accurate Quantitative Proteomic Analyses Using Metabolic Labeling and High Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS).

Authors:  Sibylle Pfammatter; Eric Bonneil; Francis P McManus; Pierre Thibault
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Improvement of phosphoproteome analyses using FAIMS and decision tree fragmentation. application to the insulin signaling pathway in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells.

Authors:  Gaëlle Bridon; Eric Bonneil; Tara Muratore-Schroeder; Olivier Caron-Lizotte; Pierre Thibault
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Ion mobility separation of isomeric phosphopeptides from a protein with variant modification of adjacent residues.

Authors:  Alexandre A Shvartsburg; David Singer; Richard D Smith; Ralf Hoffmann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  High-pH reversed-phase chromatography with fraction concatenation for 2D proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Feng Yang; Yufeng Shen; David G Camp; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.940

7.  Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks.

Authors:  Jesper V Olsen; Blagoy Blagoev; Florian Gnad; Boris Macek; Chanchal Kumar; Peter Mortensen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Collisions or electrons? Protein sequence analysis in the 21st century.

Authors:  Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  Phosphoproteomics for the masses.

Authors:  Paul A Grimsrud; Danielle L Swaney; Craig D Wenger; Nicole A Beauchene; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 10.  Phosphoproteomics in the Age of Rapid and Deep Proteome Profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas M Riley; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Advances and Trends in Omics Technology Development.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Dai; Li Shen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  FAIMS Enhances the Detection of PTM Crosstalk Sites.

Authors:  Kish R Adoni; Debbie L Cunningham; John K Heath; Aneika C Leney
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Phosphoproteomics Sample Preparation Impacts Biological Interpretation of Phosphorylation Signaling Outcomes.

Authors:  Bharath Sampadi; Leon H F Mullenders; Harry Vrieling
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 6.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.