| Literature DB >> 33269340 |
Maslyn A Greene1, James L Klotz2, Jack P Goodman3, John B May3, Brittany E Harlow2, William S Baldwin4, James R Strickland1, Jessica L Britt1, F Neal Schrick5, Susan K Duckett1.
Abstract
Gestating ewes consuming ergot alkaloids, from endophyte-infected (E+) tall fescue seed, suffer from intrauterine growth restriction and produce smaller lambs. Arginine (Arg) supplementation has been shown to increase birth weight and oral citrulline (Cit) administration is reported to increase arginine concentrations. Two experiments were conducted to: 1) evaluate if oral supplementation with Cit or water, to ewes consuming E+ fescue seed, increases lamb birth weight and 2) determine the effectiveness of Cit and citrulline:malate as an oral drench and elevating circulating levels of Cit to determine levels and dose frequency. In experiment 1, gestating Suffolk ewes (n = 10) were assigned to one of two treatments [oral drench of citrulline-malate 2:1 (CITM; 81 mg/kg/d of citrulline) or water (TOX)] to start on d 86 of gestation and continued until parturition. Ewes on CITM treatment had decreased (P < 0.05) plasma Arg and Cit concentrations during gestation. At birth, lambs from CITM ewes had reduced (P < 0.05) crude fat and total fat but did not differ (P > 0.05) in birth weight from lambs born to TOX ewes. In experiment 2, nonpregnant Suffolk ewes (n = 3) were assigned to either oral citrulline (CIT; 81 mg/kg/d), citrulline-malate 2:1 (CITM; 81 mg/kg/d of citrulline), or water (CON) drench in a Latin Square design for a treatment period of 4 d with a washout period of 3 d. On d 4, blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 18 h post drench. Oral drenching of CIT and CITM increased (P < 0.0001) Cit concentrations within 2 h and levels remained elevated for 6 h. Apparent half-life of elimination for CIT and CITM were 8.484 and 10.392 h, respectively. Our results show that lamb birth weight was not altered with a single oral drench of citrulline-malate; however, lamb body composition was altered. The level and frequency of citrulline dosing may need to be greater in order to observe consistent elevation of Cit/Arg concentrations to determine its effectiveness in mitigating fescue toxicosis.Entities:
Keywords: amino acids; citrulline; fescue toxicosis; sheep
Year: 2020 PMID: 33269340 PMCID: PMC7684870 DOI: 10.1093/tas/txaa197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Anim Sci ISSN: 2573-2102
Nutrient composition of diet, total mixed ration (TMR), endophyte-infected tall fescue seed, and citrulline:malate drench
| TMR composition | % of ration, DM basis | |
|---|---|---|
| Corn grain, cracked | 35.0 | |
| Cottonseed hulls | 25.0 | |
| Soybean hulls | 20.5 | |
| Molasses | 14.0 | |
| Soybean meal | 4.5 | |
| Limestone | 1.0 | |
|
|
|
|
| Endophyte-infected (E+) seed, tall fescue defender turf type | 0.44 | 1.77 |
|
|
| |
| LATE gestation, d 86 – parturition | ||
| TDN | 1.42 | |
| Crude protein | 0.22 |
Primer sequences used for RT-PCR analysis of lamb fat tissues
| Gene | Forward, 5′-3′ | Reverse, 5′-3′ | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| UCP1 | TGGGGATCTTTGCTAACCAG | ATGTTTTGCTTCCCCTTCCT | 0.91 |
| MYF5 | GATTCTCAGCCTGCAACTCC | ATTTTTGGTGCCTCCTTCCT | 1.03 |
| FABP4 | CATCTTGCTGAAAGCTGCAC | AGCCACTTTCCTGGTAGCAA | 1.00 |
| CYC | GGTCATCGGTCTCTTTGGAA | TCCATCACACGATGGAA | 1.01 |
| ACTB | GGGCAGTGATCTCTTTCTGC | CTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTTCCT | 1.03 |
| GAPDH | GGGTCATCATCTCTGCACCT | GGTCATAAGTCCCTCCACGA | 1.01 |
Ewe plasma amino acid concentrations (µM) in ewes fed endophyte-infected tall fescue seed and drenched with citrulline-malate (CITM) or water (TOX) from d 86 to parturition (experiment 1). All interactions between citrulline-malate treatment and day of gestation were nonsignificant (P > 0.40) and results are presented as main effects
| Treatment | CITM | TOX | SEM |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5 | 5 | ||
| Arginine | 125.8 | 153.7 | 6.20 | 0.02 |
| Citrulline | 250.0 | 287.3 | 9.76 | 0.03 |
| Glutamate | 300.3 | 300.6 | 10.82 | 0.98 |
| Glutamine | 35.72 | 54.49 | 6.050 | 0.06 |
| Isoleucine | 115.2 | 121.1 | 5.75 | 0.49 |
| Leucine | 117.6 | 126.5 | 5.91 | 0.32 |
| Lysine | 84.70 | 100.87 | 4.065 | 0.03 |
| Ornithine | 56.61 | 59.04 | 2.846 | 0.57 |
| Phenylalanine | 59.77 | 74.08 | 2.900 | 0.01 |
| Valine | 130.2 | 146.8 | 7.49 | 0.16 |
Ewe glucose, insulin, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), and prolactin concentrations in ewes fed endophyte-infected tall fescue seed and drenched with citrulline–malate (CITM) or water (TOX) from d 86 to parturition (experiment 1)
| Treatment | CITM | TOX | SEM |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5 | 5 | ||
| Prolactin, ng/mL | 19.14 | 13.53 | 6.350 | 0.87 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 57.43 | 61.28 | 1.797 | 0.17 |
| Insulin, μg/L | 0.557 | 0.610 | 0.159 | 0.81 |
| Glucose:insulin | 158.18 | 135.51 | 29.48 | 0.62 |
| NEFA, mmol/L | 0.337 | 0.242 | 0.035 | 0.06 |
| RQUICKI | 1.07 | 1.52 | 0.221 | 0.17 |
All interactions between citrulline–malate treatment and day of gestation were nonsignificant (P > 0.40) and results are presented as main effects.
RQUICKI calculated according to Holtenius and Holtenius (2007).
Effect of dosing citrulline-malate (CITM) vs. water (TOX) to ewes exposed to endophyte-infected tall fescue on maternal characteristics in experiment 1
| Treatment | CITM | TOX | SEM |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ewe ( | 5 | 5 | ||
| Ewe BW on d 85, kg | 88.85 | 83.89 | 4.844 | 0.49 |
| Ewe BW on d 140, kg | 109.64 | 105.10 | 4.452 | 0.49 |
| Ewe ADG, kg/d | 0.378 | 0.385 | 0.0195 | 0.79 |
| Ewe DMI, kg/d | 2.44 | 2.37 | 0.044 | 0.29 |
| Ewe Doppler ultrasound | ||||
| Pretreatment carotid artery area d 76, cm2 | 36.26 | 34.17 | 2.333 | 0.54 |
| Treatment carotid artery area d 112, cm2 | 29.10 | 31.39 | 3.269 | 0.63 |
| Carotid artery area difference, cm2 | −7.16 | −2.78 | 3.234 | 0.37 |
| Lamb characteristics per ewe | ||||
| Lambs born/ewe | 1.60 | 1.60 | 0.245 | 1.00 |
| Birth weight, g/ewe | 7936.1 | 7649.4 | 293.55 | 0.51 |
| Avg. crown-rump, cm | 52.33 | 52.00 | 0.344 | 0.52 |
| Lamb carcass, g | 2456.7 | 2526.5 | 226.12 | 0.83 |
| Lamb fat depots, g | ||||
| Scapular fat | 5.88 | 11.78 | 1.894 | 0.06 |
| Kidney fat | 31.20 | 43.70 | 4.227 | 0.07 |
| Heart fat | 8.85 | 4.38 | 2.186 | 0.20 |
| Lamb fat depots, % of empty body weight | ||||
| Scapular fat | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.049 | 0.09 |
| Kidney fat | 0.68 | 0.93 | 0.058 | 0.02 |
| Heart fat | 0.20 | 0.09 | 0.055 | 0.20 |
| Lamb body composition, g | ||||
| Total fat-free lean | 1148.7 | 1142.2 | 92.38 | 0.96 |
| Total bone | 1307.9 | 1384.3 | 146.65 | 0.72 |
| Total fat | 71.50 | 100.01 | 7.285 | 0.02 |
| Lamb proximate composition, % | ||||
| Moisture | 77.72 | 77.02 | 0.425 | 0.28 |
| Crude protein | 16.33 | 16.11 | 0.276 | 0.58 |
| Crude fat | 2.29 | 3.20 | 0.207 | 0.01 |
| Ash | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.026 | 0.83 |
Doppler ultrasound measurements are the difference in luminal area of the carotid artery taken on d 112 after feeding endophyte-infected tall fescue seed for 26 d compared to pre-treatment (d 76) levels.
Experiment 1. Fatty acid profile of lambs from ewes consuming E+ fescue seed and drenched with citrulline:malate (CITM) or water (TOX)
| Treatment | CITM | TOX | SEM |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acid, % | ||||
| C14:0 | 1.59 | 1.61 | 0.327 | 0.97 |
| C14:1 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.109 | 0.51 |
| C15:0 | 0.78 | 1.26 | 0.318 | 0.29 |
| C16:0 | 21.25 | 22.05 | 0.438 | 0.21 |
| C16:1 | 2.37 | 2.53 | 0.088 | 0.21 |
| C17:0 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.066 | 0.95 |
| C18:0 | 14.14 | 14.93 | 0.422 | 0.20 |
| C18:1 | 0.38 | 0.27 | 0.089 | 0.41 |
| C18:1 | 35.54 | 35.76 | 0.544 | 0.79 |
| C18:1 | 3.89 | 3.82 | 0.117 | 0.67 |
| C18:2 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 0.082 | 0.34 |
| C18:3 | 0.040 | 0.040 | 0.0310 | 0.99 |
| C20:0 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.015 | 0.51 |
| C20:1 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.019 | 0.83 |
| C20:2 | 0.127 | 0.098 | 0.0116 | 0.09 |
| C20:3 | 2.30 | 2.02 | 0.127 | 0.13 |
| C20:3 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.020 | 0.05 |
| C20:4 | 5.75 | 5.45 | 0.267 | 0.42 |
| C20:5, | 0.149 | 0.121 | 0.0082 | 0.02 |
| C22:4 | 1.28 | 1.35 | 0.034 | 0.12 |
| C22:5, | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.036 | 0.35 |
| C22:6, | 2.91 | 2.78 | 0.129 | 0.47 |
| Saturated | 36.99 | 38.59 | 0.662 | 0.09 |
| Odd-chain | 0.80 | 1.29 | 0.319 | 0.29 |
| Monounsaturated | 38.10 | 38.47 | 0.561 | 0.65 |
| Polyunsaturated | 1.39 | 1.20 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| Polyunsaturated | 3.66 | 3.45 | 0.154 | 0.36 |
| Ratio, | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.063 | 0.91 |
Simple effect of treatment displayed with means averaged from lamb total lean, liver, kidney, heart, and brain tissue,
Experiment 1. Fatty acid profile of lamb total lean, liver, kidney, heart, and brain tissues
| Tissue Type | Brain | Heart | Kidney | Liver | Total Lean | SEM |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acid, % | |||||||
| C14:0 | 1.00f | 1.26f | 1.53f | 2.99g | 1.25f | 0.518 | 0.07 |
| C14:1 | – | – | – | 0.18 | – | 0.077 | – |
| C15:0 | 2.65a | 0.30b | 0.58b | 0.23b | 1.36ab | 0.504 | 0.01 |
| C16:0 | 23.70a | 20.25b | 20.35b | 23.91a | 20.05b | 0.692 | <0.0001 |
| C16:1 | – | 1.83a | 1.90ac | 3.84b | 2.24c | 0.125 | <0.0001 |
| C17:0 | – | – | – | 0.11 | – | 0.047 | – |
| C18:0 | 18.27a | 16.55a | 12.60b | 11.88b | 13.38b | 0.668 | <0.0001 |
| C18:1 | – | – | – | 0.53a | 0.12b | 0.089 | 0.01 |
| C18:1 | 18.10a | 44.97b | 36.41c | 27.51d | 51.26e | 0.860 | <0.0001 |
| C18:1 | 4.91a | 3.40bc | 3.65b | 4.39a | 2.91c | 0.185 | <0.0001 |
| C18:2 | 0.17a | 1.25b | 1.38b | 1.05b | 0.55c | 0.130 | <0.0001 |
| C18:3 |
|
|
| 0.040 |
| 0.022 |
|
| C20:0 | 0.359a | 0.170bc | 0.222b | 0.086c | 0.133c | 0.0233 | <0.0001 |
| C20:1 | 1.45a | 0.40bd | 0.46bc | 0.53c | 0.33d | 0.030 | <0.0001 |
| C20:2 | 0.246a | 0.038b | 0.096c | 0.153d | 0.029b | 0.0183 | <0.0001 |
| C20:3 | 1.52a | 1.58a | 2.74b | 3.44c | 1.52a | 0.201 | <0.0001 |
| C20:3 | 0.429a | 0.227b | 0.372a | 0.386a | 0.099c | 0.0311 | <0.0001 |
| C20:4 | 7.98a | 3.75b | 8.24a | 6.43c | 1.59d | 0.423 | <0.0001 |
| C20:5, |
| 0.112a | 0.221b | 0.179c | 0.028d | 0.0116 | <0.0001 |
| C22:4 | 4.12a | 0.36b | 0.54c | 1.14d | 0.41bc | 0.054 | <0.0001 |
| C22:5, | 0.51a | 0.45a | 0.58a | 1.67b | 0.28c | 0.057 | <0.0001 |
| C22:6, | 10.09a | 0.52b | 1.12c | 2.23d | 0.25b | 0.203 | <0.0001 |
| Saturated | 42.97a | 38.06b | 34.48c | 38.78b | 34.68c | 1.046 | <0.0001 |
| Odd-chain | 2.65a | 0.30b | 0.58b | 0.34b | 1.36ab | 0.504 | 0.01 |
| Monounsaturated | 19.55a | 47.20b | 38.77c | 32.07d | 53.84e | 0.888 | <0.0001 |
| Polyunsaturated | 0.84a | 1.52b | 1.84b | 1.59b | 0.68a | 0.136 | <0.0001 |
| Polyunsaturated | 10.60a | 1.07b | 1.92c | 3.62d | 0.56b | 0.244 | <0.0001 |
| Ratio, | 0.082a | 1.470b | 1.014c | 0.477d | 1.251bc | 0.1000 | <0.0001 |
Simple effect of tissue type displayed with means averaged across maternal treatments.
abcdeMeans in the same row differ (P < 0.05).
fgMeans in the same row differ (P < 0.10).
Figure 1.Citrulline concentrations (A) in ewe lambs drenched with an oral dose of citrulline (CIT), citrulline-malate (CITM), or water (CON; experiment 2). Area under the curve (B) for citrulline concentrations for CIT, CITM, and CON ewe lambs.