| Literature DB >> 33266768 |
Nosheen Feroz1, Zahir Shah1, Saeed Islam1, Ebraheem O Alzahrani2, Waris Khan3.
Abstract
This article examines the entropy analysis of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) nanofluid flow of single and multiwall carbon nanotubes between two rotating parallel plates. The nanofluid flow is taken under the existence of Hall current and ion-slip effect. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are highly proficient heat transmission agents with bordering entropy generation and, thus, are considered to be a capable cooling medium. Entropy generation and Hall effect are mainly focused upon in this work. Using the appropriate similarity transformation, the central partial differential equations are changed to a system of ordinary differential equations, and an optimal approach is used for solution purposes. The resultant non-dimensional physical parameter appear in the velocity and temperature fields discussed using graphs. Also, the effect of skin fraction coefficient and Nusselt number of enclosed physical parameters are discussed using tables. It is observed that increased values of magnetic and ion-slip parameters reduce the velocity of the nanofluids and increase entropy generation. The results reveal that considering higher magnetic forces results in greater conduction mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: CNTs; HAM; Hall and ion-slip effect; MHD; entropy generation; rotating system; thermal radiation
Year: 2019 PMID: 33266768 PMCID: PMC7514159 DOI: 10.3390/e21010052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Entropy (Basel) ISSN: 1099-4300 Impact factor: 2.524
Figure 1Geometry of the state problem.
Figure 2Impact of on , when .
Figure 3Impact of on , when .
Figure 4Impact of on , when .
Figure 5Impact of on , when .
Figure 6Impact of on , when .
Figure 7Impact of on , when .
Figure 8Impact of on , when .
Figure 9Impact of on , when .
Figure 10Impact of on , when .
Figure 11Impact of on , when .
Figure 12Impact of on , when .
Figure 13Impact of on , when .
Figure 14Impact of on , when .
Figure 15Impact of on , when .
Figure 16Impact of on , when .
Figure 17Impact of on , when .
Figure 18Impact of , when .
Figure 19Impact of on , when .
Figure 20Impact of on , when .
Figure 21Impact of on , when .
Figure 22Impact of on , when .
Figure 23Impact of on , when .
Figure 24Impact of on , when .
Figure 25Impact of on , when .
Figure 26Impact of on , when .
Figure 27Impact of on , when .
The numerical values of skin friction when .
| 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | −0.484638 | −0.515879 |
| 0.3 | −0.470976 | −0.529161 | |||||
| 0.5 | 0.2 | −0.458474 | −0.541466 | ||||
| 0.4 | −0.461839 | −0.538401 | |||||
| 0.6 | 0.4 | −0.465886 | −0.534719 | ||||
| 0.7 | −0.472578 | −0.529764 | |||||
| 1.0 | −1.5 | −0.483196 | −0.521086 | ||||
| −0.1 | −2.187070 | −1.202060 | |||||
| 0.1 | −1.006670 | −0.971885 | |||||
| 1.5 | 0.3 | −0.835078 | 0.523539 | ||||
| 0.4 | 0.491335 | 0.511560 | |||||
| 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.498996 | −0.503849 | ||||
| 0.6 | 0.490763 | 0.511484 | |||||
| 1.0 | 0.495080 | 0.507058 |
The numerical values of Nusselt number when .
| 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 7.2 | −0.001105 | 0.000884 |
| 0.3 | −0.001107 | 0.000886 | ||||||
| 0.5 | 0.2 | −0.001110 | 0.000889 | |||||
| 0.4 | −0.001445 | 0.001157 | ||||||
| 0.6 | 0.4 | −0.001779 | 0.001429 | |||||
| 0.7 | −0.002337 | 0.001887 | ||||||
| 1.0 | −1.5 | −0.002932 | 0.002347 | |||||
| −0.1 | −0.000808 | 0.000995 | ||||||
| 0.1 | −0.002280 | 0.001443 | ||||||
| 1.5 | 0.3 | −0.002596 | 0.004649 | |||||
| 0.4 | −0.003721 | 0.004249 | ||||||
| 0.5 | 0.2 | −0.003404 | 0.003887 | |||||
| 0.6 | −0.002348 | 0.002682 | ||||||
| 1.0 | 7.2 | −0.001862 | 0.002126 | |||||
| 7.3 | −0.001862 | 0.002126 | ||||||
| 7.5 | −0.001862 | 0.002126 |
Physical properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) (Xie et al. [50]).
| Materials | SWCNTs | MWCNTs |
|---|---|---|
| 3000 | 3000 | |
| 50–500 | 10–60 | |
| 1 | 0.3–1 |