| Literature DB >> 30345407 |
Zahir Shah1, Ebenezer Bonyah2, Saeed Islam1, Waris Khan3, Mohammad Ishaq3.
Abstract
In this research work we have examined the flow of Williamson liquid film fluid with heat transmission and having the impact of thermal radiation embedded in a permeable medium over a time dependent stretching surface. The fluid flow of liquid films is assumed in two dimensions. By using suitable similarity transformation the governing non-linear partial differential equations have been transformed into non-linear differential equations. An optimal approach has been used to acquire the solution of the modelled problem. The convergence of the technique has been shown numerically. The impact of the Skin friction and Nusslet number and their influence on thin film flow are shown numerically. Thermal radiation, unsteadiness effect and porosity have mainly focused in this paper. Furthermore, for conception and physical demonstration the entrenched parameters, like porosity parameter k , Prandtl number Pr , unsteadiness parameter S , Radiation parameter R d , Magnetic parameter M , and Williamson fluid parameter have been discussed graphically in detail with their effect on liquid film flow.Entities:
Keywords: Applied mathematics; Computational mathematics
Year: 2018 PMID: 30345407 PMCID: PMC6191962 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Geometry of the demonstrated problems.
Fig. 2Combined curves of and at order approximation.
Convergence of by HAM method when .
| Solution Approximations | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1.90218 | −0.24761 |
| 2 | −1.90259 | −0.214609 |
| 3 | −1.90267 | −0.219032 |
| 4 | −1.90268 | −0.218439 |
| 5 | −1.90269 | −0.218519 |
| 6 | −1.90269 | −0.218508 |
| 7 | −1.90269 | −0.218510 |
| 8 | −1.90269 | −0.218509 |
| 9 | −1.90269 | −0.218509 |
Fig. 3The influence of on when .
Fig. 4The influence of on when .
Fig. 5The influence of on when .
Fig. 6The influence of on when .
Fig. 7The influence of on when .
Fig. 8The influence of on when .
Fig. 9The influence of on when .
Fig. 10The influence of on when .
The Skin friction coefficient for dissimilar values of and when .
| k | Tawade et al | Present results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.257696 | 0.223456 |
| 1.0 | 0.420739 | 0.432111 | |||
| 2.0 | 0.526782 | 0.712351 | |||
| 5.0 | 0.695757 | 1.023001 | |||
| 1.0 | 0.01 | 1.030899 | 1.625341 | ||
| 0.1 | 0.931433 | 1.236540 | |||
| 1.0 | 0.420739 | 0.988872 | |||
| 5.0 | 0.011137 | 0.566100 | |||
| 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.227566 | 0.222109 | ||
| 1.0 | 0.420739 | 0.432091 | |||
| 3.0 | 0.715871 | 0.674109 | |||
| 5.0 | 0.826899 | 0.992221 | |||
| 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.190930 | 0.011236 | ||
| 0.2 | 0.223926 | 0.227634 | |||
| 0.3 | 0.250515 | 0.537000 | |||
| 0.4 | 0.281804 | 0.719273 | |||
| 0.340312 | 1.200235 |
Wall temperature gradient verses various value of embedded parameters when .
| 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.682385 |
| 0.5 | 0.541422 | |||
| 1.0 | 0.440569 | |||
| 2.0 | 0.311380 | |||
| 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.411411 | ||
| 0.2 | 0.321022 | |||
| 0.3 | 0.300420 | |||
| 0.4 | 0.291420 | |||
| 0.5 | 0.111427 | |||
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.411420 | ||
| 0.5 | 0.371420 | |||
| 1.5 | 0.182285 | |||
| 5.0 | 0.011422 | |||
| 10 | 0.000569 | |||
| 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.411420 | ||
| 0.4 | 0.612427 | |||
| 0.6 | 0.891428 | |||
| 0.8 | 1.500987 | |||
| 1.0 | 2.087651 |
The effects of dissimilar values of and on Skin friction coefficient.
| 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.33027 |
| 0.5 | 2.94882 | |||
| 1.0 | 2.64208 | |||
| 1.5 | 0.1 | 4.33999 | ||
| 0.5 | 4.32157 | |||
| 1.0 | 4.26897 | |||
| 1.5 | 0.1 | 5.64227 | ||
| 0.5 | 5.44576 | |||
| 1.0 | 4.89911 | |||
| 1.5 | 0.1 | 4.12743 | ||
| 0.5 | 4.35772 | |||
| 1.0 | 5.13048 | |||
| 1.5 | 5.91612 |