| Literature DB >> 33263552 |
Mandong Liu1,2, Tongge Jiang3, Kexin Yu1,2, Shinyi Wu1,2,4, Maryalice Jordan-Marsh1, Iris Chi1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Caregiving and self-care are challenging for Chinese immigrants in the United States due to limited accessible support and resources. Few interventions exist to assist Chinese immigrant caregivers in better performing self-care. To address this gap in the literature, our team developed the Care Me Too app to engage Chinese immigrant caregivers in self-care and conducted a user experience test to assess its usability and acceptability.Entities:
Keywords: acceptability; caregiver; co-design; immigrant; mHealth; mobile phone; usability
Year: 2020 PMID: 33263552 PMCID: PMC7744258 DOI: 10.2196/20325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Form Res ISSN: 2561-326X
Figure 1The 3 phases of participant co-design based on the design thinking process.
Figure 2Home screen of the Care Me Too app.
Feedback for app functions.
| Function | Positive feedback | Suggestions |
| Required and | 1. Participants could learn how to better care for themselves and care recipients. | 1. Be able to highlight, copy, and save content in the app and share it with others. |
| BMSa videos | 1. Short BMS videos would assist caregivers in exercising conveniently. | 1. Encourage caregivers and care recipients to exercise together. |
| Coaching | 1. Participants could ask questions and get expert advice. | 1. Provide a clear function description, such as instructions on when to contact coaches and how much it costs. |
| Chat room (WeChat as platform) | 1. WeChat group could enhance caregivers’ communication on caregiving and health-related issues. | 1. Provide a clear function description, such as the purpose of having a caregiver WeChat group. |
| Community resource inventory | The function could assist caregivers in seeking help and gaining support. | 1. Provide Chinese resources. |
| Certificate (brought up by participants) | A certificate would be proof of skill training. | 1. Divide the training into several sessions. |
| Games and rewards (brought up by participants) | N/Ab | 1. In-app entertaining games could be designed for care recipients and caregivers to play and spend time together. |
aBMS: body-mind-soul.
bN/A: not applicable.
Feedback for overall app design.
| Themes | Design heuristics | Positive feedback | Suggestions |
| Visibility | 1. Aesthetic and minimalist design | Some participants liked the current color theme. | 1. Font: |
| Navigation and | 1. Flexibility and efficiency of use | 1. It was easy to navigate the app. | 1. Have a table of contents to go directly to a specific page. |
| Password and | Recognition rather than recall | The password requirement was valued by some participants. | 1. Password should be automatically saved. |
| Language and terms | Match between systems and real world | Some participants said the terms and expressions used were understandable. | 1. Pay attention to different expressions in different regions of China. |
| Help and documentation | Help and documentation | The current help document (hard copy) was easy to use. | 1. Some preferred a hard copy; some preferred the in-app text version; some wanted an in-person orientation; some preferred an instruction video; some wanted to have a PDF document on the computer. |
App ratings after the 1-week at-home use.
| Questions | Values | |
| How many days in the past week did you use the app, mean (SD) | 5.6 (2.0) | |
| On average, how many minutes per day did you use the app, mean (SD) | 26.8 (19.4) | |
|
|
| |
|
| Very good | 11 (52) |
|
| Good | 9 (43) |
|
| So-so | 1 (5) |
|
|
| |
|
| Appropriate | 11 (52) |
|
| Too small | 10 (48) |
|
|
| |
|
| Yes | 16 (76) |
|
| No | 5 (24) |
|
|
| |
|
| All by myself | 20 (95) |
|
| Needed a lot of help from others | 1 (5) |
|
|
| |
|
| Curriculum | 14 (67) |
|
| Functions | 2 (10) |
|
| Navigation | 1 (5) |
|
| Speed | 1 (5) |
|
| Other (convenience, can communicate issues with others, like all above) | 3 (14) |
|
|
| |
|
| Visual appeal and feeling | 6 (29) |
|
| Other (prefer to listen; need more updates of the content; would like to have more consultations regarding health, diet, and healthy recipes; exercise videos not easy to find) | 6 (29) |
|
| Nothing disliked | 9 (43) |
|
|
| |
|
| Yes | 4 (19) |
|
| No | 17 (81) |
|
|
| |
|
| As good as other apps | 2 (50) |
|
| Better than other apps | 2 (50) |
|
|
| |
|
| Interested | 19 (91) |
|
| Not sure | 1 (5) |
|
| Not interested (reason: already learned the content) | 1 (5) |
| Will you recommend this app to others in the future (yes), n (%) | 21 (100) | |