BACKGROUND: Proteasomes are proteolytic complexes with prominent roles in the control of protein homeostasis and cellular viability. However, little is known about the effects of storage and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD-) on the activity and topology of red blood cell (RBC) proteasomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the concentration (by GeLC-MS proteomics analysis and immunoblotting), activity (by using peptide substrates and proteasome inhibitors), and subcellular/extracellular distribution (following cell fractionation and isolation of extracellular vesicles, respectively) of RBC proteasomes in fresh blood and RBCs from control and G6PD- donors following storage in leukoreduced units. RBC proteasome activity was also tested in transfusion-mimicking conditions in vitro. RESULTS: Stored RBCs were characterised by decreased cytosolic proteasome activity compared to fresh RBCs but increased membrane activity and protein concentration levels. Active proteasomes along with other "repair or destroy" proteins are recruited to the membrane during storage. A proportion of them is released in the supernatant in soluble form or inside extracellular vesicles. Significantly increased enzymatic activity and release of proteasomes were observed in G6PD- vs control RBCs. Similar variations were observed in stress protein biomarkers at the G6PD- membrane. The proteasome profile (mainly the caspase-like activity) had significant correlations with the G6PD- metabolome and quality markers of the RBC units. The storage-induced modifications in the proteasome activities were only partly restored in transfusion-mimicking conditions. DISCUSSION: Storage conditions and G6PD deficiency affect (individually and in synergy) the abundance, distribution, activity, and release of RBC proteasomes. The partial irreversibility of these effects in transfusion-mimicking conditions demands further investigation of their clinical impact on transfusion outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Proteasomes are proteolytic complexes with prominent roles in the control of protein homeostasis and cellular viability. However, little is known about the effects of storage and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD-) on the activity and topology of red blood cell (RBC) proteasomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the concentration (by GeLC-MS proteomics analysis and immunoblotting), activity (by using peptide substrates and proteasome inhibitors), and subcellular/extracellular distribution (following cell fractionation and isolation of extracellular vesicles, respectively) of RBC proteasomes in fresh blood and RBCs from control and G6PD- donors following storage in leukoreduced units. RBC proteasome activity was also tested in transfusion-mimicking conditions in vitro. RESULTS: Stored RBCs were characterised by decreased cytosolic proteasome activity compared to fresh RBCs but increased membrane activity and protein concentration levels. Active proteasomes along with other "repair or destroy" proteins are recruited to the membrane during storage. A proportion of them is released in the supernatant in soluble form or inside extracellular vesicles. Significantly increased enzymatic activity and release of proteasomes were observed in G6PD- vs control RBCs. Similar variations were observed in stress protein biomarkers at the G6PD- membrane. The proteasome profile (mainly the caspase-like activity) had significant correlations with the G6PD- metabolome and quality markers of the RBC units. The storage-induced modifications in the proteasome activities were only partly restored in transfusion-mimicking conditions. DISCUSSION: Storage conditions and G6PD deficiency affect (individually and in synergy) the abundance, distribution, activity, and release of RBC proteasomes. The partial irreversibility of these effects in transfusion-mimicking conditions demands further investigation of their clinical impact on transfusion outcomes.
Authors: Vassilis L Tzounakas; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Hara T Georgatzakou; Leontini E Foudoulaki-Paparizos; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Matthew J Wither; Travis Nemkov; Kirk C Hansen; Issidora S Papassideri; Angelo D'Alessandro; Marianna H Antonelou Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Richard O Francis; Angelo D'Alessandro; Andrew Eisenberger; Mark Soffing; Randy Yeh; Esther Coronel; Arif Sheikh; Francesca Rapido; Francesca La Carpia; Julie A Reisz; Sarah Gehrke; Travis Nemkov; Tiffany Thomas; Joseph Schwartz; Chaitanya Divgi; Debra Kessler; Beth H Shaz; Yelena Ginzburg; James C Zimring; Steven L Spitalnik; Eldad A Hod Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ho Hee Jang; Kyun Oh Lee; Yong Hun Chi; Bae Gyo Jung; Soo Kwon Park; Jin Ho Park; Jung Ro Lee; Seung Sik Lee; Jeong Chan Moon; Jeong Won Yun; Yeon Ok Choi; Woe Yeon Kim; Ji Seoun Kang; Gang-Won Cheong; Dae-Jin Yun; Sue Goo Rhee; Moo Je Cho; Sang Yeol Lee Journal: Cell Date: 2004-05-28 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Eleni-Dimitra Papanagnou; Evangelos Terpos; Efstathios Kastritis; Issidora S Papassideri; Ourania E Tsitsilonis; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Ioannis P Trougakos Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-04-03
Authors: Daniel Stephenson; Travis Nemkov; Syed M Qadri; William P Sheffield; Angelo D'Alessandro Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Alkmini T Anastasiadi; Efthymios C Paronis; Vasiliki-Zoi Arvaniti; Athanasios D Velentzas; Anastasia C Apostolidou; Evangelos G Balafas; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Nikolaos G Kostomitsopoulos; Konstantinos Stamoulis; Issidora S Papassideri; Angelo D'Alessandro; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Marianna H Antonelou; Vassilis L Tzounakas Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Vassilis L Tzounakas; Alkmini T Anastasiadi; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Dimitrios G Karadimas; Konstantinos Stamoulis; Issidora S Papassideri; Kirk C Hansen; Angelo D'Alessandro; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Marianna H Antonelou Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 5.923