Literature DB >> 27094493

Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficient subjects may be better "storers" than donors of red blood cells.

Vassilis L Tzounakas1, Anastasios G Kriebardis2, Hara T Georgatzakou1, Leontini E Foudoulaki-Paparizos3, Monika Dzieciatkowska4, Matthew J Wither4, Travis Nemkov4, Kirk C Hansen4, Issidora S Papassideri1, Angelo D'Alessandro5, Marianna H Antonelou6.   

Abstract

Storage of packed red blood cells (RBCs) is associated with progressive accumulation of lesions, mostly triggered by energy and oxidative stresses, which potentially compromise the effectiveness of the transfusion therapy. Concerns arise as to whether glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficient subjects (G6PD(-)), ~5% of the population in the Mediterranean area, should be accepted as routine donors in the light of the increased oxidative stress their RBCs suffer from. To address this question, we first performed morphology (scanning electron microscopy), physiology and omics (proteomics and metabolomics) analyses on stored RBCs from healthy or G6PD(-) donors. We then used an in vitro model of transfusion to simulate transfusion outcomes involving G6PD(-) donors or recipients, by reconstituting G6PD(-) stored or fresh blood with fresh or stored blood from healthy volunteers, respectively, at body temperature. We found that G6PD(-) cells store well in relation to energy, calcium and morphology related parameters, though at the expenses of a compromised anti-oxidant system. Additional stimuli, mimicking post-transfusion conditions (37°C, reconstitution with fresh healthy blood, incubation with oxidants) promoted hemolysis and oxidative lesions in stored G6PD(-) cells in comparison to controls. On the other hand, stored healthy RBC units showed better oxidative parameters and lower removal signaling when reconstituted with G6PD(-) fresh blood compared to control. Although the measured parameters of stored RBCs from the G6PD deficient donors appeared to be acceptable, the results from the in vitro model of transfusion suggest that G6PD(-) RBCs could be more susceptible to hemolysis and oxidative stresses post-transfusion. On the other hand, their chronic exposure to oxidative stress might make them good recipients, as they better tolerate exposure to oxidatively damaged long stored healthy RBCs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G6PD deficiency; Omics analyses; Oxidative stress; Red blood cell storage lesion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27094493     DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med        ISSN: 0891-5849            Impact factor:   7.376


  52 in total

Review 1.  Red blood cell components: time to revisit the sources of variability.

Authors:  Rosemary L Sparrow
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Protect, repair, destroy or sacrifice: a role of oxidative stress biology in inter-donor variability of blood storage?

Authors:  Angelo D'Alessandro; Kirk C Hansen; Elan Z Eisenmesser; James C Zimring
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 3.  Omics markers of the red cell storage lesion and metabolic linkage.

Authors:  Angelo D'alessandro; Travis Nemkov; Julie Reisz; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Matthew J Wither; Kirk C Hansen
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Unraveling the Gordian knot: red blood cell storage lesion and transfusion outcomes.

Authors:  Vassilis L Tzounakas; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Jerard Seghatchian; Issidora S Papassideri; Marianna H Antonelou
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 5.  Cumulative erythrocyte damage in blood storage and relevance to massive transfusions: selective insights into serial morphological and biochemical findings.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Putter; Jerard Seghatchian
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 6.  Red blood cell storage lesion: causes and potential clinical consequences.

Authors:  Tatsuro Yoshida; Michel Prudent; Angelo D'alessandro
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.443

7.  Biophysical and Biochemical Markers of Red Blood Cell Fragility.

Authors:  Ariel Orbach; Orly Zelig; Saul Yedgar; Gregory Barshtein
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.747

8.  Personalised Transfusion Medicine.

Authors:  Angelo D'Alessandro; Giancarlo Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 9.  Red blood cell storage time and transfusion: current practice, concerns and future perspectives.

Authors:  María García-Roa; María Del Carmen Vicente-Ayuso; Alejandro M Bobes; Alexandra C Pedraza; Ataúlfo González-Fernández; María Paz Martín; Isabel Sáez; Jerard Seghatchian; Laura Gutiérrez
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.443

10.  Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase deficient red blood cell units are associated with decreased posttransfusion red blood cell survival in children with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Eyal Sagiv; Ross M Fasano; Naomi L C Luban; Cassandra D Josephson; Sean R Stowell; John D Roback; Richard O Francis; Marianne E M Yee
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 10.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.