| Literature DB >> 33262905 |
Kazuno Negishi1, Masahiko Ayaki1,2, Miki Uchino1, Kazuo Takei3, Kazuo Tsubota1,4.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the association of dry eye disease (DED)-related signs and symptoms with two tear function tests.Entities:
Keywords: Schirmer test; dry eye; strip meniscometry; tear breakup time
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33262905 PMCID: PMC7691796 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.12.31
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Figure 1.Tear SM. Aqueous availability in the lower meniscus is measured by a round-tipped strip. Wetted length is indicated by a blue-stained line along the tear absorption path (arrow).
Comparison of Symptoms and Ocular Surface Parameters Between Male and Female Participants
| Characteristic | All | Male | Female |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of symptoms (%) | ||||
| Dryness | 24.8 | 22.6 | 25.9 | 0.600 |
| Irritation | 23.8 | 17.3 | 27.4 | 0.101 |
| Pain | 13.8 | 9.3 | 16.3 | 0.161 |
| Lacrimation | 6.7 | 5.3 | 7.4 | 0.564 |
| Fatigue | 41.0 | 36.0 | 43.7 | 0.277 |
| Blurring | 32.4 | 36.0 | 30.4 | 0.403 |
| Photophobia | 27.6 | 25.3 | 28.9 | 0.581 |
| Ocular surface parameters (mean ± standard deviation) | ||||
| ST (mm) | 12.9 ± 9.3 | 12.1 ± 8.4 | 13.4 ± 9.8 | 0.311 |
| SM (mm) | 2.5 ± 1.6 | 2.5 ± 1.7 | 2.4 ± 1.5 | 0.755 |
| Corneal staining score | 0.43 ± 0.66 | 0.36 ± 0.58 | 0.47 ± 0.70 | 0.240 |
| BUT (s) | 3.1 ± 2.0 | 3.6 ± 2.0 | 2.7 ± 2.0 | <0.001 |
| Topical medication and phakic status (%) | ||||
| Topical medication (any) ( | 41.9 | 34.7 | 45.9 | 0.113 |
| Hyaluronate ( | 15.3 | 20.0 | 12.7 | 0.152 |
| Mucin secretagogue ( | 18.7 | 9.3 | 23.9 | 0.010 |
| Steroid ( | 2.4 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 0.458 |
| Glaucoma ( | 6.7 | 9.3 | 5.3 | 0.248 |
| IOL ( | 12.9 | 12.0 | 13.3 | 0.782 |
Eyedrops were hyaluronate (0.1% hyaluronate), mucin secretagogue (3% diquafosol; 2% rebamipide), steroid (prescribed as combination of 0.1% fluorometholone and 0.1% hyaluronate), 0.1% pranoprofen, and antiglaucoma (0.005% latanoprost; 0.004% travoprost, 0.5% timolol; 2% carteolol; mixed combination of 1% dorzolamide and 0.5% timolol; 0.4% ripasudil). IOL, intraocular lens.
P < 0.05, male versus female, χ2 test or t-test as appropriate.
Comparison of ST and SM in Evaluating the Presence or Absence of Ocular Surface Symptoms
| Characteristic | ST (mm) | SM (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms | Present | Absent |
| Present | Absent |
|
| Dryness | 13.1 ± 9.7 | 12.9 ± 9.2 | 0.454 | 3.0 ± 2.0 | 3.1 ± 2.0 | 0.392 |
| Irritation | 13.0 ± 9.2 | 13.0 ± 9.2 | 0.494 | 2.6 ± 1.8 | 3.2 ± 2.1 | 0.046 |
| Pain | 13.6 ± 9.4 | 12.9 ± 9.3 | 0.341 | 2.6 ± 2.1 | 3.1 ± 2.0 | 0.131 |
| Lacrimation | 15.1 ± 9.1 | 12.8 ± 9.3 | 0.207 | 2.7 ± 1.6 | 3.1 ± 2.1 | 0.238 |
| Fatigue | 13.1 ± 9.7 | 12.9 ± 9.4 | 0.442 | 3.2 ± 1.9 | 2.9 ± 2.1 | 0.191 |
| Blurring | 13.7 ± 9.1 | 12.7 ± 9.4 | 0.233 | 2.7 ± 1.6 | 3.2 ± 2.2 | 0.092 |
| Photophobia | 12.6 ± 9.7 | 13.1 ± 9.3 | 0.587 | 2.5 ±1.9 | 3.2 ± 2.1 | 0.011 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
P < 0.05, unpaired t-test.
Comparison of ST and SM With Respect to Phakic Status and Topical Medication
| Characteristic | ST (mm) |
| SM (mm) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOL (OD) (±) ( | 13.1 ± 9.4/12.0 ± 8.8 | 0.551 | 2.5 ± 1.6/2.2 ± 1.4 | 0.262 |
| No medication ( | 14.0 ± 9.8 | — | 2.6 ± 1.8 | — |
| Hyaluronate ( | 10.1 ± 8.2 | 0.026 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 0.020 |
| Mucin secretagogue ( | 10.0 ± 7.2 | 0.007 | 2.3 ± 1.2 | 0.235 |
| Glaucoma ( | 11.4 ± 7.0 | 0.227 | 2.3 ± 1.7 | 0.468 |
Data are mean ± standard deviation. —, XXX.
P < 0.05, phakic versus IOL or versus no medication, unpaired t-test.
Correlation Between Tear Function Tests and Ocular Surface Parameters
| ST | SM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | β |
| β |
|
| Linear regression analysis | ||||
| Age | –0.229 (–0.361 to –0.097) | 0.001 | –0.065 (–0.201 to 0.071) | 0.336 |
| Sex | –0.067 (–0.201 to 0.067) | 0.339 | 0.062 (–0.074 to 0.198) | 0.360 |
| Ocular surface parameter | ||||
| BUT | –0.026 (–0.163 to 0.111) | 0.717 | 0.149 (0.012 to 0.286) | 0.031 |
| Corneal staining score | –0.076 (–0.207 to 0.055) | 0.272 | –0.050 (–0.183 to 0.083) | 0.460 |
| ST | — | — | 0.255 (0.118 to 0.392) | <0.001 |
| SM | 0.255 (0.122 to 0.388) | <0.001 | — | — |
| Multiple regression analysis | ||||
| Age | –0.201 (–0.333 to –0.069) | 0.003 | –0.060 (–0.196 to 0.075) | 0.383 |
| Sex | –0.066 (–0.200 to 0.067) | 0.329 | –0.008 (–0.144 to 0.128) | 0.906 |
| BUT | –0.099 (–0.236 to 0.037) | 0.154 | 0.191 (0.054 to 0.328) | 0.006 |
| Corneal staining score | –0.060 (–0.191 to 0.070) | 0.363 | 0.019 (–0.113 to 0.152) | 0.768 |
| ST | — | — | 0.228 (0.092 to 0.365) | 0.001 |
| SM | 0.223 (0.090 to 0.355) | 0.001 | — | — |
The 95% confidence interval is in parentheses.
P < 0.05, standardized partial regression coefficient.
Figure 2.The correlation between the ST and SM values. The scatterplot of ST and SM values reveals a significant correlation (P < 0.001).
Figure 3.Scatterplots of ST values (left), SM values (right), and age. ST was correlated with age (P = 0.001), and SM was not (P = 0.336).
Figure 4.Scatterplots of ST values (left), SM values (right), and tear BUT. SM was correlated with BUT (P = 0.031), but ST was not (P = 0.717). Many symbols in the right panel are overlapping, and the number of data may not seem to match the number of participants.