| Literature DB >> 33261605 |
Sidikiba Sidibé1,2, Alexandre Delamou3,4, Bienvenu Salim Camara3,4, Nafissatou Dioubaté4, Hawa Manet4, Alison M El Ayadi5, Lenka Benova6, Seni Kouanda7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Guinea, high fertility among adolescents and young women in urban areas remains a public health concern. This study describes trends in contraceptive use, unmet need, and factors associated with the use of modern family planning (FP) methods among urban adolescents and young women in Guinea.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents and young adults; Contraception; Family planning; Guinea DHS; Health disparities; Unmet need
Year: 2020 PMID: 33261605 PMCID: PMC7706031 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09957-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Key indicators of family planning used in analysis
| Indicator | Numerator | Denominator |
|---|---|---|
| % Using of a modern FP method among all | Women using a modern FP method | All sexually active urban girls and young women |
| % Unmet need for FP among all women | Women in need of FP but not using any FP method | Women in need of FP |
| % using a modern FP method among women in need of FP (demand satisfied) | Women using a modern FP method | Women in need of FP (Groups 3 + 4) |
Descriptive characteristics of urban adolescents and young women (15–24 years old), Guinea by survey year
| Socio-demographic characteristics | Variables | 1999 DHS | 2005 DHS | 2012 DHS | 2018 DHS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | ||
| Age group (years) | 15–19 | 57.5 | 53.8–61.2 | 59.4 | 56.2–62.5 | 54.3 | 51.6–56.9 | 58.8 | 56.2–61.4 |
| 20–24 | 42.5 | 38.8–46.2 | 40.7 | 37.5–43.9 | 45.7 | 43.1–48.4 | 41.2 | 38.6–43.8 | |
| Administrative region | Boke urban | NA | NA | 9.1 | 7.3–11.4 | 9.9 | 8.0–12.3 | 7.3 | 5.9–9.1 |
| Conakry | NA | NA | 47.9 | 42.5–53.4 | 58.9 | 53.3–64.3 | 46.2 | 41.5–51.0 | |
| Faranah urban | NA | NA | 5.3 | 4.2–7.3 | 5.7 | 3.8–8.5 | 5.9 | 4.4–7.7 | |
| Kankan urban | NA | NA | 5.7 | 4.3–7.4 | 5.2 | 4.1–6.7 | 8.0 | 6.6–9.7 | |
| Kindia urban | NA | NA | 8.8 | 6.1–12.5 | 9.1 | 6.2–13.0 | 13.8 | 11.1–17.1 | |
| Labe urban | NA | NA | 3.5 | 2.6–4.7 | 1.6 | 1.0–2.5 | 2.9 | 1.9–4.4 | |
| Mamou urban | NA | NA | 2.4 | 1.7–3.5 | 1.9 | 1.3–2.7 | 3.5 | 1.7–7.1 | |
| N’Zérékoré urban | NA | NA | 17.1 | 11.6–24.3 | 7.7 | 6.0–9.9 | 12.4 | 8.8–17.4 | |
| Education level | No Education | 46.9 | 43.5–50.7 | 39.7 | 35.9–43.7 | 26.2 | 22.8–30.0 | 28.9 | 26.1–31.1 |
| Primary | 29.2 | 26.2–32.3 | 21.8 | 19.1–24.8 | 20.9 | 18.2–23.9 | 18.2 | 15.3–20.7 | |
| Secondary | 22.3 | 19.2–25.8 | 37.8 | 33.4–42.4 | 44.7 | 41.1–48.3 | 46.0 | 41.9–48.4 | |
| Higher | 1.6 | 1.0–2.7 | 0.6 | 0.3–1.3 | 8.2 | 6.2–10.7 | 6.9 | 7.0–10.4 | |
| Religion | Muslim | 90.5 | 87.2–92.9 | 87.4 | 81.2–91.7 | 91.7 | 89.1–93.7 | 88.8 | 81.2–91.9 |
| Christian and other | 9.5 | 7.1–12.8 | 12.7 | 8.3–18.8 | 8.3 | 6.3–10.9 | 11.2 | 8.1–18.8 | |
| Marital status | Never married | 53.8 | 49.9–57.7 | 59.0 | 54.3–63.6 | 64.9 | 60.6–69.0 | 67.4 | 65.1–71.0 |
| Ever married | 46.2 | 42.3–50.2 | 41.0 | 36.4–45.7 | 35.1 | 31.1–39.4 | 32.6 | 28.9–34.9 | |
| Ethnicity | Soussou | 29.5 | 24.4–35.0 | 25.6 | 19.9–31.4 | 28.6 | 22.7–35.3 | 29.5 | 24.7–34.8 |
| Peulh | 28.1 | 23.4–33.5 | 33.7 | 27.7–40.2 | 31.2 | 24.9–38.2 | 25.7 | 21.5–30.3 | |
| Malinké | 30.4 | 26.4–34.8 | 26.2 | 22.4–30.3 | 29.0 | 25.6–32.8 | 30.6 | 26.6–35.0 | |
| Other | 12.0 | 9.3–14.9 | 14.9 | 10.7–20.4 | 11;3 | 8.8–14.3 | 14.2 | 9.7–20.4 | |
| Household wealth index (quintiles) | Poorest | 0.2 | 0.0–1.4 | 0.6 | 0.2–2.1 | 0.5 | 0.2–1.3 | 0.4 | 0.2–2.2 |
| Poorer | 0.2 | 0.0–0.8 | 1.2 | 0.5–2.7 | 0.8 | 0.4–2.0 | 2.4 | 1.1–6.7 | |
| Middle | 3.7 | 2.6–5.5 | 4.7 | 2.9–7.3 | 2.7 | 1.8–4.1 | 6.1 | 4.0–8.0 | |
| Richer | 28.1 | 23.6–33.0 | 27.5 | 22.8–32.6 | 33.3 | 28.5–38.4 | 35.9 | 28.6–37.5 | |
| Richest | 67.8 | 62.9–72.4 | 66.1 | 60.6–71.2 | 62.7 | 57.3–67.8 | 55.2 | 52.6–63.2 | |
Fig. 1Trends in use of FP methods among adolescents and young women in urban areas Guinea
Fig. 2Time-trends in unmet need and demand satisfied among urban adolescents and young women in need of FP in Guinea, by DHS
Current use of modern FP methods with regard to socio-demographic characteristics among urban adolescents and young women. Bivariate analysis and Logistic regression model with adjusted odds ratios, Guinea Demographic and Health Survey 2018 (n = 1876)
| Socio-demographic characteristics | Variable | Bivariate | Multivariate Analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | AOR | 95% CI | Walid test | |||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||||
| 15–19 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 20–24 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 3.5 | < 0.001 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 4.1 | < 0.001* | |
| Conakry | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Boke urban | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.039 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.125 | |
| Faranah urban | 1.4 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 0.318 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 6.5 | 0.04* | |
| Kankan urban | 2.1 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 0.018 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 7.8 | 0.001* | |
| Kindia urban | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 0.569 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.851 | |
| Labe urban | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.131 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 4.1 | 0.718 | |
| Mamou urban | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.184 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 0.231 | |
| N’Zérékoré urban | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 0.948 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 0.312 | |
| No education | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Primary | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.489 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 0.529 | |
| Secondary | 0,9 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.961 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 0.993 | |
| Higher | 2.4 | 1.5 | 4.1 | 0.001 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 0.063 | |
| Muslim | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Christian and other | 1.5 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 0.068 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 0.923 | |
| Never married | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Ever married | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.115 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.021* | |
| Sousou | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Peulh | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | < 0.001 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | < 0.001* | |
| Malinké | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.208 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.006* | |
| Other | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 0.854 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.462 | |
| Poorer/poorest | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Middle | 8.5 | 1.5 | 27.0 | 0.016 | 7.7 | 1.4 | 42.2 | 0.019* | |
| Richer | 5.6 | 1.1 | 17.9 | 0.041 | 6.3 | 1.1 | 38.1 | 0.045* | |
| Richest | 5.0 | 1.0 | 15.6 | 0.047 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 31.8 | 0.073 | |
OR Crude odd ratio, AOR Adjusted odds ratio. *p-value = Evidence statistically significant.