| Literature DB >> 26286609 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a critical stage in the life course and evidence suggests that even though contraceptive use has been steadily increasing among women in Ghana over the past years, contraceptive prevalence and determinants among female adolescents is quite lacking. This paper examines the prevalence and correlates of contraceptive use among female adolescents in Ghana.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26286609 PMCID: PMC4545366 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-015-0221-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Prevalence of contraceptive use among a sample of 1037 women in Ghana ages 15 to 19, by select characteristics: 2008
| Characteristic | Frequency | Percent distribution | Percent using contraception |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age of woman | |||
| 15–17 | 610 | 58.8 | 9.2 |
| 18–19 | 427 | 41.2 | 31.4 |
| Level of education | |||
| No education | 87 | 8.4 | 3.5 |
| Primary | 242 | 23.3 | 19.0 |
| Secondary/Higher | 708 | 68.3 | 19.9 |
| Religious affiliation | |||
| Catholic | 170 | 16.4 | 14.7 |
| Other Christian | 623 | 60.0 | 20.1 |
| Muslim | 180 | 17.4 | 19.4 |
| Traditional/spiritual | 64 | 6.2 | 7.8 |
| Ethnicity | |||
| Akan | 471 | 45.4 | 20.4 |
| Ga/Dangme | 60 | 5.8 | 30.0 |
| Ewe | 127 | 12.2 | 22.8 |
| Mole-Dagbani | 379 | 36.6 | 12.4 |
| Marital status | |||
| Not married | 941 | 90.7 | 15.3 |
| Married/living together | 96 | 9.3 | 47.9 |
| Work status | |||
| Working | 357 | 34.4 | 28.9 |
| Not working | 680 | 65.6 | 12.8 |
| Wealth status | |||
| Poor | 436 | 42.0 | 15.4 |
| Average | 199 | 19.2 | 25.6 |
| Rich | 402 | 38.8 | 17.9 |
| Knowledge of ovulatory cycle | |||
| Yes | 789 | 76.1 | 21.9 |
| No | 248 | 23.9 | 6.8 |
| Visited health facility | |||
| Yes | 285 | 27.5 | 30.2 |
| No | 752 | 72.5 | 13.8 |
| Place of residence | |||
| Urban | 447 | 43.1 | 21.0 |
| Rural | 590 | 56.9 | 16.3 |
| Region of residence | |||
| Western | 95 | 9.1 | 15.9 |
| Central | 77 | 7.4 | 23.4 |
| Greater Accra | 130 | 12.5 | 21.5 |
| Volta | 89 | 8.6 | 18.0 |
| Eastern | 104 | 10.0 | 30.8 |
| Ashanti | 163 | 15.7 | 22.1 |
| Brong Ahafo | 76 | 7.3 | 19.7 |
| Northern | 109 | 10.5 | 4.6 |
| Upper East | 80 | 7.7 | 10.0 |
| Upper west | 114 | 11.0 | 14.9 |
Source: Computed from 2008 GDHS data set
Logistic regression of correlates of female adolescents’ contraceptive use
| Variables | Odds ratio |
| 95 % conf. interval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age of adolescent | |||
| 15–17 (Ref) | 1 | ||
| 18–19 | 3.49*** | 0.000 | 2.32–4.15 |
| Level of education | |||
| No education (Ref) | 1 | ||
| Primary | 7.39** | 0.003 | 1.88–2.72 |
| Secondary/higher | 11.53*** | 0.000 | 2.84–3.13 |
| Religious affiliation | |||
| Catholic (Ref) | 1 | ||
| Other Christians | 2.65 | 0.674 | 0.62–2.06 |
| Muslim | 1.14 | 0.064 | 1.21–3.78 |
| Traditional/spiritual | 1.05 | 0.942 | 0.32–3.36 |
| Ethnicity | |||
| Akan (Ref) | 1 | ||
| Ga/Dangme | 1.49 | 0.303 | 0.69–3.21 |
| Ewe | 1.48 | 0.258 | 0.75–2.97 |
| Mole-Dagbani | 0.79 | 0.509 | 0.38–1.59 |
| Marital status | |||
| Not married (Ref) | 1 | ||
| Married/Living together | 4.75*** | 0.000 | 2.48–4.86 |
| Work status | |||
| Not working (Ref) | 1 | ||
| Working | 2.99*** | 0.000 | 2.01–4.51 |
| Wealth status | |||
| Poor | 1 | ||
| Average | 1.37 | 0.274 | 0.77–2.41 |
| Rich | 1.65 | 0.172 | 0.35–1.20 |
| Knowledge of ovulation cycle | |||
| No | 1 | ||
| Yes | 2.89*** | 0.000 | 1.57–3.05 |
| Visited health facility | |||
| No (Ref) | 1 | ||
| Yes | 1.96*** | 0.001 | 1.31–2.92 |
| Place of residence | |||
| Rural (Ref) | 1 | ||
| Urban | 1.39 | 0.204 | 0.83–2.32 |
| Region of residence | |||
| Western | 1 | ||
| Central | 1.57 | 0.319 | 0.64–3.81 |
| Greater Accra | 1.22 | 0.630 | 0.54–2.78 |
| Volta | 0.47 | 0.149 | 0.17–1.31 |
| Eastern | 2.54 | 0.060 | 1.15–3.58 |
| Ashanti | 1.10 | 0.808 | 0.51–2.34 |
| Brong Ahafo | 1.18 | 0.722 | 0.47–2.93 |
| Northern | 0.13 | 0.062 | 0.04–1.45 |
| Upper East | 0.46 | 0.228 | 0.13–1.61 |
| Upper West | 0.76 | 0.608 | 0.27–2.16 |
Source: Computed from 2008 GDHS data set
Ref reference category
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001