Literature DB >> 33259472

Biologically-informed neural networks guide mechanistic modeling from sparse experimental data.

John H Lagergren1,2, John T Nardini1,3, Ruth E Baker4, Matthew J Simpson5, Kevin B Flores1,2.   

Abstract

Biologically-informed neural networks (BINNs), an extension of physics-informed neural networks [1], are introduced and used to discover the underlying dynamics of biological systems from sparse experimental data. In the present work, BINNs are trained in a supervised learning framework to approximate in vitro cell biology assay experiments while respecting a generalized form of the governing reaction-diffusion partial differential equation (PDE). By allowing the diffusion and reaction terms to be multilayer perceptrons (MLPs), the nonlinear forms of these terms can be learned while simultaneously converging to the solution of the governing PDE. Further, the trained MLPs are used to guide the selection of biologically interpretable mechanistic forms of the PDE terms which provides new insights into the biological and physical mechanisms that govern the dynamics of the observed system. The method is evaluated on sparse real-world data from wound healing assays with varying initial cell densities [2].

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33259472     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  8 in total

1.  WEAK SINDY FOR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

Authors:  Daniel A Messenger; David M Bortz
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.645

2.  Neural network aided approximation and parameter inference of non-Markovian models of gene expression.

Authors:  Qingchao Jiang; Xiaoming Fu; Shifu Yan; Runlai Li; Wenli Du; Zhixing Cao; Feng Qian; Ramon Grima
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Quantitative analysis of tumour spheroid structure.

Authors:  Alexander P Browning; Jesse A Sharp; Nikolas K Haass; Matthew Simpson; Ryan J Murphy; Gency Gunasingh; Brodie Lawson; Kevin Burrage
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Bayesian uncertainty quantification for data-driven equation learning.

Authors:  Simon Martina-Perez; Matthew J Simpson; Ruth E Baker
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 2.704

5.  Understanding glioblastoma invasion using physically-guided neural networks with internal variables.

Authors:  Jacobo Ayensa-Jiménez; Mohamed H Doweidar; Jose A Sanz-Herrera; Manuel Doblare
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 6.  Renal blood flow and oxygenation.

Authors:  Aurelie Edwards; Vartan Kurtcuoglu
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Model-informed experimental design recommendations for distinguishing intrinsic and acquired targeted therapeutic resistance in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Santiago D Cárdenas; Constance J Reznik; Ruchira Ranaweera; Feifei Song; Christine H Chung; Elana J Fertig; Jana L Gevertz
Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl       Date:  2022-09-08

Review 8.  Two heads are better than one: current landscape of integrating QSP and machine learning : An ISoP QSP SIG white paper by the working group on the integration of quantitative systems pharmacology and machine learning.

Authors:  Tongli Zhang; Ioannis P Androulakis; Peter Bonate; Limei Cheng; Tomáš Helikar; Jaimit Parikh; Christopher Rackauckas; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian; Carolyn R Cho
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.745

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.