Literature DB >> 34744183

WEAK SINDY FOR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

Daniel A Messenger1, David M Bortz1.   

Abstract

Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) is a method of system discovery that has been shown to successfully recover governing dynamical systems from data [6, 39]. Recently, several groups have independently discovered that the weak formulation provides orders of magnitude better robustness to noise. Here we extend our Weak SINDy (WSINDy) framework introduced in [28] to the setting of partial differential equations (PDEs). The elimination of pointwise derivative approximations via the weak form enables effective machine-precision recovery of model coefficients from noise-free data (i.e. below the tolerance of the simulation scheme) as well as robust identification of PDEs in the large noise regime (with signal-to-noise ratio approaching one in many well-known cases). This is accomplished by discretizing a convolutional weak form of the PDE and exploiting separability of test functions for efficient model identification using the Fast Fourier Transform. The resulting WSINDy algorithm for PDEs has a worst-case computational complexity of O ( N D + 1 log ( N ) ) for datasets with N points in each of D + 1 dimensions. Furthermore, our Fourier-based implementation reveals a connection between robustness to noise and the spectra of test functions, which we utilize in an a priori selection algorithm for test functions. Finally, we introduce a learning algorithm for the threshold in sequential-thresholding least-squares (STLS) that enables model identification from large libraries, and we utilize scale invariance at the continuum level to identify PDEs from poorly-scaled datasets. We demonstrate WSINDy's robustness, speed and accuracy on several challenging PDEs. Code is publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/MathBioCU/WSINDy_PDE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Galerkin method; convolution; data-driven model selection; partial differential equations; sparse recovery; weak solutions

Year:  2021        PMID: 34744183      PMCID: PMC8570254          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Phys        ISSN: 0021-9991            Impact factor:   4.645


  20 in total

1.  Identification of significant host factors for HIV dynamics modelled by non-linear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Hulin Wu; Lang Wu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Using Experimental Data and Information Criteria to Guide Model Selection for Reaction-Diffusion Problems in Mathematical Biology.

Authors:  David J Warne; Ruth E Baker; Matthew J Simpson
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Detecting the maximum likelihood transition path from data of stochastic dynamical systems.

Authors:  Min Dai; Ting Gao; Yubin Lu; Yayun Zheng; Jinqiao Duan
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.642

4.  Robust data-driven discovery of governing physical laws with error bars.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Guang Lin
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.704

5.  Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Steven L Brunton; Joshua L Proctor; J Nathan Kutz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sparse model selection via integral terms.

Authors:  Hayden Schaeffer; Scott G McCalla
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.529

7.  Using noisy or incomplete data to discover models of spatiotemporal dynamics.

Authors:  Patrick A K Reinbold; Daniel R Gurevich; Roman O Grigoriev
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.529

8.  Learning Equations from Biological Data with Limited Time Samples.

Authors:  John T Nardini; John H Lagergren; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Lee Curtin; Bethan Morris; Erica M Rutter; Kristin R Swanson; Kevin B Flores
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  Predicting catastrophes in nonlinear dynamical systems by compressive sensing.

Authors:  Wen-Xu Wang; Rui Yang; Ying-Cheng Lai; Vassilios Kovanis; Celso Grebogi
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 9.161

10.  Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems.

Authors:  Tina Toni; David Welch; Natalja Strelkowa; Andreas Ipsen; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ensemble-SINDy: Robust sparse model discovery in the low-data, high-noise limit, with active learning and control.

Authors:  U Fasel; J N Kutz; B W Brunton; S L Brunton
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  An improved sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics with Akaike information criterion and group sparsity.

Authors:  Xin Dong; Yu-Long Bai; Yani Lu; Manhong Fan
Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 5.741

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.