Literature DB >> 33258783

Screening for Depression in Daily Life: Development and External Validation of a Prediction Model Based on Actigraphy and Experience Sampling Method.

Olga Minaeva1, Harriëtte Riese1, Femke Lamers2, Niki Antypa3, Marieke Wichers1, Sanne H Booij4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many countries, depressed individuals often first visit primary care settings for consultation, but a considerable number of clinically depressed patients remain unidentified. Introducing additional screening tools may facilitate the diagnostic process.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether experience sampling method (ESM)-based measures of depressive affect and behaviors can discriminate depressed from nondepressed individuals. In addition, the added value of actigraphy-based measures was examined.
METHODS: We used data from 2 samples to develop and validate prediction models. The development data set included 14 days of ESM and continuous actigraphy of currently depressed (n=43) and nondepressed individuals (n=82). The validation data set included 30 days of ESM and continuous actigraphy of currently depressed (n=27) and nondepressed individuals (n=27). Backward stepwise logistic regression analysis was applied to build the prediction models. Performance of the models was assessed with goodness-of-fit indices, calibration curves, and discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]).
RESULTS: In the development data set, the discriminative ability was good for the actigraphy model (AUC=0.790) and excellent for both the ESM (AUC=0.991) and the combined-domains model (AUC=0.993). In the validation data set, the discriminative ability was reasonable for the actigraphy model (AUC=0.648) and excellent for both the ESM (AUC=0.891) and the combined-domains model (AUC=0.892).
CONCLUSIONS: ESM is a good diagnostic predictor and is easy to calculate, and it therefore holds promise for implementation in clinical practice. Actigraphy shows no added value to ESM as a diagnostic predictor but might still be useful when ESM use is restricted. ©Olga Minaeva, Harriëtte Riese, Femke Lamers, Niki Antypa, Marieke Wichers, Sanne H Booij. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 01.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actigraphy; activity tracker; depression; experience sampling method; prediction model; screening

Year:  2020        PMID: 33258783     DOI: 10.2196/22634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  2 in total

1.  Digital phenotype of mood disorders: A conceptual and critical review.

Authors:  Redwan Maatoug; Antoine Oudin; Vladimir Adrien; Bertrand Saudreau; Olivier Bonnot; Bruno Millet; Florian Ferreri; Stephane Mouchabac; Alexis Bourla
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  Uncovering complexity details in actigraphy patterns to differentiate the depressed from the non-depressed.

Authors:  Sandip Varkey George; Yoram K Kunkels; Sanne Booij; Marieke Wichers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.