Literature DB >> 33258769

Reinforcement regulates timing variability in thalamus.

Jing Wang1,2, Eghbal Hosseini2, Nicolas Meirhaeghe3, Adam Akkad2, Mehrdad Jazayeri2.   

Abstract

Learning reduces variability but variability can facilitate learning. This paradoxical relationship has made it challenging to tease apart sources of variability that degrade performance from those that improve it. We tackled this question in a context-dependent timing task requiring humans and monkeys to flexibly produce different time intervals with different effectors. We identified two opposing factors contributing to timing variability: slow memory fluctuation that degrades performance and reward-dependent exploratory behavior that improves performance. Signatures of these opposing factors were evident across populations of neurons in the dorsomedial frontal cortex (DMFC), DMFC-projecting neurons in the ventrolateral thalamus, and putative target of DMFC in the caudate. However, only in the thalamus were the performance-optimizing regulation of variability aligned to the slow performance-degrading memory fluctuations. These findings reveal how variability caused by exploratory behavior might help to mitigate other undesirable sources of variability and highlight a potential role for thalamocortical projections in this process.
© 2020, Wang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thalamus; behavioral variability; human; neuroscience; reinforcement learning; rhesus macaque; timing

Year:  2020        PMID: 33258769      PMCID: PMC7707818          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.55872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  112 in total

1.  Action and outcome encoding in the primate caudate nucleus.

Authors:  Brian Lau; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Motor selection dynamics in FEF explain the reaction time variance of saccades to single targets.

Authors:  Christopher K Hauser; Dantong Zhu; Terrence R Stanford; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Exploration Disrupts Choice-Predictive Signals and Alters Dynamics in Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  R Becket Ebitz; Eddy Albarran; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Neural signatures of reward and sensory error feedback processing in motor learning.

Authors:  Dimitrios J Palidis; Joshua G A Cashaback; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Cortical state and attention.

Authors:  Kenneth D Harris; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Neuronal correlates of post-error slowing in the rat dorsomedial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Nandakumar S Narayanan; Mark Laubach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Guarding the gateway to cortex with attention in visual thalamus.

Authors:  Kerry McAlonan; James Cavanaugh; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A Neural Mechanism for Sensing and Reproducing a Time Interval.

Authors:  Mehrdad Jazayeri; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Corticostriatal dynamics encode the refinement of specific behavioral variability during skill learning.

Authors:  Fernando J Santos; Rodrigo F Oliveira; Xin Jin; Rui M Costa
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Central Thalamus: Gatekeeper or Processing Hub?

Authors:  Bianca Sieveritz; Ramanujan T Raghavan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Thalamic subnetworks as units of function.

Authors:  Dheeraj S Roy; Ying Zhang; Michael M Halassa; Guoping Feng
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 28.771

3.  Awareness of errors and feedback in human time estimation.

Authors:  Farah Bader; Martin Wiener
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Rodents monitor their error in self-generated duration on a single trial basis.

Authors:  Tadeusz Władysław Kononowicz; Virginie van Wassenhove; Valérie Doyère
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  A proxy measure of striatal dopamine predicts individual differences in temporal precision.

Authors:  Renata Sadibolova; Luna Monaldi; Devin B Terhune
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-22

6.  The temporal context in bayesian models of interval timing: Recent advances and future directions.

Authors:  Renata Sadibolova; Devin B Terhune
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.154

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.