| Literature DB >> 33256672 |
Szabolcs Garbóczy1, Éva Magócs2, Gergő József Szőllősi3, Szilvia Harsányi4, Anikó Égerházi2, László Róbert Kolozsvári5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) often presages the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Accurate and early identification of cognitive impairment will substantially reduce the burden on the family and alleviate the costs for the whole society. There is a need for testing methods that are easy to perform even in a general practitioner's office, inexpensive and non-invasive, which could help the early recognition of mental decline. We have selected the Test Your Memory (TYM), which has proven to be reliable for detecting AD and MCI in several countries. Our study was designed to test the usability of the Hungarian version of the TYM (TYM-HUN) comparing with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in MCI recognition in the Hungarian population.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Dementia; Diagnosis; Early detection; Mild cognitive impairment; Test
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33256672 PMCID: PMC7708165 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02982-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Psychiatry ISSN: 1471-244X Impact factor: 3.630
Fig. 1Comparison of the MMSE, ADAS-Cog, and TYM-HUN median scores and interquartile ranges (IQR) between the MCI and HC group with box plots
Fig. 2The correlation between ADAS-Cog and MMSE in the total sample (n = 50)
The scores of the TYM-HUN, HC and MCI (diagnosed with ADAS-Cog) patients and the sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV)
| TYM-HUN | HC | MCI | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 0 | 1 | 4% | 100% | 100% | 51% |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 100% | 100% | 51% |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 100% | 100% | 51% |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 100% | 100% | 51% |
| 29 | 0 | 1 | 8% | 100% | 100% | 52% |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 100% | 100% | 52% |
| 31 | 0 | 1 | 12% | 100% | 100% | 53% |
| 32 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 100% | 100% | 53% |
| 33 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 100% | 100% | 53% |
| 34 | 0 | 2 | 20% | 100% | 100% | 56% |
| 35 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 100% | 100% | 56% |
| 36 | 0 | 1 | 24% | 100% | 100% | 57% |
| 37 | 0 | 1 | 28% | 100% | 100% | 58% |
| 38 | 0 | 2 | 36% | 100% | 100% | 61% |
| 39 | 0 | 2 | 44% | 100% | 100% | 64% |
| 40 | 0 | 2 | 52% | 100% | 100% | 68% |
| 41 | 0 | 3 | 64% | 100% | 100% | 74% |
| 42 | 0 | 1 | 68% | 100% | 100% | 76% |
| 43 | 1 | 2 | 76% | 96% | 95% | 80% |
| 44 | 0 | 1 | 80% | 96% | 95% | 83% |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 80% | 92% | 91% | 82% |
| 46 | 5 | 2 | 88% | 72% | 76% | 86% |
| 47 | 7 | 3 | 100% | 44% | 64% | 100% |
| 48 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 28% | 58% | 100% |
| 49 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 12% | 53% | 100% |
| 50 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 11% | 50% | 100% |
Fig. 3The ROC curve shows the Sensitivity and 1-Specificity of the TYM-HUN test with MCI patients