| Literature DB >> 33256588 |
Shengnan Huang1, Wenjie Liu1, Junjie Xu1, Zhiyong Liu1, Chengyu Li1, Hui Feng2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pistil development is a complicated process in plants, and female sterile mutants are ideal material for screening and cloning pistil development-related genes. Using the female sterile mutant (fsm1), BraA04g009730.3C was previously predicted as a candidate mutant gene encoding the STERILE APETALA (SAP) transcriptional regulator. In the current study, a parallel female sterile mutant (fsm2) was derived from EMS mutagenesis of a Chinese cabbage DH line 'FT' seeds. <br> RESULTS: Both fsm2 and fsm1 mutant phenotypes exhibited pistil abortion and smaller floral organs. Genetic analysis indicated that the phenotype of mutant fsm2 was also controlled by a single recessive nuclear gene. Allelism testing showed that the mutated fsm1 and fsm2 genes were allelic. A single-nucleotide mutation (G-to-A) in the first exon of BraA04g009730.3C caused a missense mutation from GAA (glutamic acid) to GGA (glycine) in mutant fsm2 plants. Both allelic mutations of BraA04g009730.3C in fsm1 and fsm2 conferred the similar pistil abortion phenotype, which verified the SAP function in pistil development. To probe the mechanism of SAP-induced pistil abortion, we compared the mutant fsm1 and wild-type 'FT' pistil transcriptomes. Among the 3855 differentially expressed genes obtained, 29 were related to ovule development and 16 were related to organ size. <br> CONCLUSION: Our study clarified the function of BraA04g009730.3C and revealed that it was responsible for ovule development and organ size. These results lay a foundation to elucidate the molecular mechanism of pistil development in Chinese cabbage.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese cabbage; EMS mutagenesis; Female sterility; RNA-Seq; STERILE APETALA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33256588 PMCID: PMC7708145 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02741-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Morphological characterization of the wild-type ‘FT’ plants and female-sterile fsm1 and fsm2 mutants. a. Flowers of the wild-type ‘FT’ plants and fsm1 and fsm2 mutants. b. Pistils of the wild-type ‘FT’ plants and fsm1 and fsm2 mutants. c. Sepals of the wild-type ‘FT’ plants and fsm1 and fsm2 mutants. d. Petals of the wild-type ‘FT’ plants and fsm1 and fsm2 mutants. e. Stamens of the wild-type ‘FT’ plants and fsm1 and fsm2 mutants. Scale bar: 1 mm
Seed-setting rates of mutant fsm2
| Generation | No. of pollinated flower buds | No. of harvested seeds | No. of seeds per bud |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 0 | 0 | |
| 60 | 0 | 0 | |
| ‘FT’ × | 60 | 657 | 10.95 |
Genetic analysis of the fsm2 mutant in Chinese cabbage
| Generation | ‘FT’ | Total | Segregation Ratio | Expected Ratio | Chi-square (χ2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 (‘FT’) | 30 | 0 | 30 | |||
| P2 ( | 0 | 30 | 30 | |||
| F1 (P1 × P2) | 200 | 0 | 200 | |||
| F′1 (P2 × P1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| BC1 (F1 × ‘FT’) | 193 | 0 | 193 | |||
| BC1 (F1 × | 98 | 88 | 186 | 1.11: 1 | 1:1 | 2.15 |
| F2 | 172 | 53 | 225 | 3.25: 1 | 3:1 | 0.81 |
Fig. 2Comparison of BraA04g009730.3C gene structure and sequence alignment between wild-type ‘FT’ and mutant fsm2 plants. a. Gene structure of BraA04g009730.3C and the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) site. b. Alignment of BraA04g009730.3C encoding sequences and amino acid sequences. The green underline and red frame show the sites where the SNP and the non-synonymous mutation occurred, respectively. c. Partial three-dimensional structure of BraA04g009730.3C in wild-type (left) and mutant fsm2 (right). Amino acid sequences include the SNPs. The red arrow represents different amino acid conformations at the mutation site
Read statistics based on the RNA-Seq data of six libraries of the ‘FT’ and mutant fsm1 plants
| Summary | FT1 | FT2 | FT3 | M1 | M2 | M3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total clean reads | 42,746,476 | 41,561,500 | 44,335,758 | 42,295,428 | 45,020,978 | 43,241,842 |
| Total base pairs | 6,411,971,400 | 6,234,225,000 | 6,650,363,700 | 6,344,314,200 | 6,753,146,700 | 6,486,276,300 |
| Total mapped reads | 39,033,708 (91.31%) | 38,088,951 (91.64%) | 40,682,504 (91.76%) | 38,770,778 (91.67%) | 40,816,520 (90.66%) | 39,425,925 (91.18%) |
| Uniquely mapped reads | 38,117,525 (97.65%) | 37,249,014 (97.79%) | 39,755,549 (97.72%) | 37,950,226 (97.88%) | 39,788,236 (97.48%) | 38,451,819 (97.53%) |
| Multiple mapped reads | 916,183 (2.35%) | 839,937 (2.21%) | 926,955 (2.28%) | 820,552 (2.12%) | 1,028,284 (2.52%) | 974,106 (2.47%) |
Note: Total mapped reads are the sum of uniquely matched reads and multiple mapped reads
Fig. 3Twenty most significantly enriched KEGG metabolic pathways
Fig. 4Expression of differentially expressed genes involved in the auxin signal transduction pathway. Note: The bar on the right represents the relative expression values. Gene expression is measured by counting the log2-based fragments per kilobase of transcript per million read values. Green arrows indicate genes that were downregulated and yellow arrows indicate genes that were both upregulated and downregulated
Fig. 5RT-qPCR analysis of gene expression patterns. * indicates a significant difference at the 0.05 level determined by t-test
Fig. 6Possible SAP-mediated regulatory pathways involved in fsm mutants pistil development. The size of the circle represents the number of genes. Red and green indicate upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. Yellow indicates genes that were both upregulated and downregulated