| Literature DB >> 25776435 |
Andrew Tedder1, Matthias Helling1, John R Pannell1, Rie Shimizu-Inatsugi1, Tetsuhiro Kawagoe2, Julia van Campen1, Jun Sese1, Kentaro K Shimizu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The coexistence of hermaphrodites and female-sterile individuals, or androdioecy, has been documented in only a handful of plants and animals. This study reports its existence in the plant species Cardamine amara (Brassicaceae), in which female-sterile individuals have shorter pistils than seed-producing hermaphrodites.Entities:
Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana; Brassicaceae; Cardamine amara; androdioecy; asexual reproduction; clonal propagation; female sterility; reduced male fertility
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25776435 PMCID: PMC4373288 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Bot ISSN: 0305-7364 Impact factor: 4.357
Sample populations and estimation of frequencies of female-sterile individuals. For the two populations Küssnachter Tobel and Wehrenbach, subsets of plants were chosen for in-depth analysis of floral morphology
| Population | Latitude (N) | Longitude (E) | Hermaphrodites | Female-sterile | Frequency of female sterility (%) | Date sampled | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Küssnachter Tobel | 47·31 | 8·63 | 248 | 234 | 14 | 5·65 | May 2009 |
| Küssnachter Tobel focal | 47·31 | 8·63 | 77 | 56 | 21 | 27·0 | May 2009 and May 2010 |
| Wehrenbach | 47·36 | 8·56 | 114 | 52 | 62 | 54·4 | April 2011 |
| Wehrenbach focal | 47·36 | 8·56 | 86 | 41 | 45 | 52·3 | April 2010 to April 2011 |
| Goldach | 47·41 | 9·48 | 187 | 177 | 10 | 5·35 | May 2010 |
| Ticino | 46·51 | 8·67 | 51 | 51 | 0 | 0·00 | May 2011 |
*These populations were sampled non-randomly to ensure adequate female-sterile sampling.
FDiagram illustrating the floral traits measured in this study and the method by which phenotypic sex was determined. Flowers are viewed as a dissection. PL, pistil length; HL, herkogamy of medial stamen (stigma–mid-anther separation of the four medial stamens); HS, herkogamy of lateral stamen (stigma–mid-anther separation of the two short stamens); LMS, length of medial stamen; LLS, length of lateral stamen; VHL, virtual horizontal line used to determine phenotypic sex. If the stigma was above this line (A) the flower was assumed to be hermaphrodite. If the stigma fell below this line (B) it was assumed to be female-sterile.
Means (standard errors) of all parameters measured at KTP and WP for hermaphrodite and female-sterile individuals
| Category | Trait | KTP | WP | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hermaphrodites | Female sterile | Hermaphrodites | Female sterile | ||||||
| Morphological measurements | 1 | Medial stamen length (LMS) | 6·42 (0·39) | 6·86 (0·57) | *** | 6·05 (0·51) | 4·63 (1·46) | *** | |
| 2 | Lateral stamen length (LLS) | 5·62 (0·41) | 6·09 (0·65) | *** | 5·4 (0·51) | 4·79 (0·89) | *** | ||
| 3 | Pistil length (PL) | 6·55 (0·82) | 3·43 (0·71) | *** | 6·2 (0·78) | 2·55 (0·84) | *** | ||
| 4 | Herkogamy of medial stamen (HL) | 0·3 (0·79) | –3·15 (0·55) | *** | 0·29 (0·7) | –1·93 (0·9) | *** | ||
| 5 | Herkogamy of lateral stamen (HS) | 1·38 (0·77) | –2·03 (0·66) | *** | 1·17 (0·58) | –1·96 (0·83) | *** | ||
| Ovule measurements | 6 | Ovule number (average of five pistils) | 27·63 (3·27) | 22·33 (1·52) | *** | 27·21 (2·98) | 21·42 (1·68) | *** | |
| 7 | Ovule area (μm2) | 2·01 × 104 (234) | 1·13 × 104 (212) | *** | 2·01 × 104 (273) | 9·6 × 103 (299) | *** | ||
| Flower measurements | 8 | Total flowers per ramet | – | – | – | 41·83 (12·1) | 64·66 (29·07) | ||
| 9 | Total flowers per genet | 43·5 | 193·98 | Not tested | 61·49 | 230·84 | Not tested | ||
| Pollen measurements | 10 | Average pollen per flower | – | – | – | 1·77 × 104 | 1·38 × 104 (0·461 × 104) | Not significant | |
| (0·696 × 104) | |||||||||
| 11 | Average pollen per ramet | – | – | – | 7·04 × 105 | 8·92 × 105 | Not tested | ||
| 12 | Average pollen per genet | 7·32 × 105 | 2·68 × 106 | 1·03 × 106 | 3·84 × 106 | Not tested | |||
| 13 |
Cross pollination as father (to hermaphrodite mother) Left, H × H; right, H × FS. | Average seed number per silique | 2·18 (3·85) | 1·22 (0·84 | Not significant | 3·73 (3·49) | 1·4 (0·98) | ||
| 14 | Proportion of siliques with at least one seed | 0·44 (0·33) | 0·21 (0·07) | Not significant | 0·55 (0·39) | 0·40 (0·28) | Not significant | ||
| Seed measurements | 15 |
Cross pollination as mother Left, H × (H and FS); right, FS × (H and FS) | Average seed number per silique | 1·8 (2·95) | 0·17 (0·38) | *** | 2·57 (2·71) | 0 (0) | *** |
| 16 | Proportion of silique with at least one seed | 0·35 (0·27) | 0·05 (0·12) | *** | 0·48 (0·33) | 0 (0) | *** | ||
| 17 | Average seed number per ramet | – | – | – | 44·5 (36·7) | 0 (0) | *** | ||
| 18 | Average seed number per genet | 46·28 | 0 | Not tested | 65·42 (22·75) | 0 (0) | Not tested | ||
| 19 | Control (bagged, with no manual pollination) | Average seed number per silique | 0·54 (0·67) | 0 (0) | Not tested | 0·16 (0·47) | 0 (0) | Not tested | |
| 20 | Proportion of siliques with at least one seed | 0·14 (0·16) | 0 (0) | Not tested | 0·06 (0·19) | 0 (0) | Not tested | ||
| 21 | Natural pollinations as mother | Average seed number when naturally pollinated | 4·36 (3·18) | 0 (0) | *** | 4·17 (2·9) | 0 (0) | *** | |
| 22 | Proportion of siliques with at least one seed when naturally pollinated | 0·71 (0·27) | 0 (0) | *** | 0·73 (0·19) | 0 (0) | *** | ||
| 23 | Self pollinations Left, H × H (self); right, FS × FS (self) | Average seed number | 1·16 (1·05) | 0·22 (0·54) | *** | 2·99 (2·06) | 0 (0) | *** | |
| 24 | Proportion of siliques with at least one seed | 0·38 (0·32) | 0·01 (0·03) | *** | 0·55 (0·40) | 0 (0) | *** | ||
| Clonality | 25 | Clonal spread | 1·04 (0·2) | 3 (3·63) | ** | 1·47 (0·84) | 3·57 (4·01) | Not significant | |
| Clonal diversity ( | 0·85 | 0·25 | Not tested | 0·35 | 0·11 | Not tested | |||
| 26 | Genet frequency | 0·89 | 0·11 | Not tested | 0·71 | 0·29 | Not tested | ||
| 27 | Number of unique genotypes (number of tested ramets) | 48 (53) | 6 (18) | Not tested | 15 (22) | 6 (25) | Not tested | ||
| Genetic diversity | 28 | Estimated heterozygosity ( | 0·39 | 0·34 | |||||
| 29 | Observed heterozygosity ( | 0·48 | 0·51 | ||||||
| 30 | Inbreeding coefficient ( | 0·18 (−0·1 to 0·46) | 0·32 (0·06–0·58) | ||||||
| 31 | Inferred selfing rate ( | 0·31 | 0·49 | ||||||
P-values were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. For details of median, range, χ2 and actual P-values, see Supplementary Data Table S4.
–, measurement not taken at KTP
aData from the field study
bEstimate of total flower number per genet at KTP based on total flower number per ramet measurements from WP.
cEstimate of average pollen per genet at KTP based on average pollen per ramet data collected at WP.
dEstimate of seed per genet at KTP based on seeds per ramet measurements from WP.
eEstimation assumed no difference between hermaphrodite and female-sterile individuals at WP and KTP.
fEstimates of genetic diversity were calculated at the population level, including both hermaphrodite and female-sterile genotypes.
g95 % confidence intervals are given in parentheses.
No inbreeding depression was assumed in inferring selfing rate.
*P < 0·05; **P < 0·01; ***P < 0·001.
FDistribution of floral morphological measurements at (A) KTP and (B) WP. Individuals are ranked according to pistil length (PL). Black arrows indicate FS individuals, which showed leaky female fertility at KTP.
FOvules from 1-d-old flowers of Cardamine amara. (A) Ovules of a hermaphrodite flower have an embryo sac with an egg cell (arrow) and two unfused polar nuclei. (B) Ovules of female-sterile flower arrest in early development around the time of meiosis. The arrow indicates the megaspore produced immediately after meiosis.
FEpifluorescence micrographs showing pollen viability of female-sterile pollen on a hermaphrodite stigma (A) and hermaphrodite pollen on a female-sterile stigma (B). Pollen tubes are clearly visible in both images in fluorescent blue. Pollen tubes are indicated by arrows.
FHierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis of the expression pattern of 11 900 genes after removing all genes that did not show 100 % binding to the microarray chip. H1, H2.1 and H2.2 represent hermaphrodites, and FS1, FS2 and FS3 represent female-sterile individuals. The three biological replicates of each morph cluster together.