| Literature DB >> 33255686 |
Monika Szepes1,2, Anna Melchert1,2, Julia Dahlmann1,3, Jan Hegermann3,4, Christopher Werlein5, Danny Jonigk2,3,5, Axel Haverich1,2,3, Ulrich Martin1,2,3, Ruth Olmer1,3, Ina Gruh1,2.
Abstract
Myocardial interstitial fibrosis (MIF) is characterized by excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, increased myocardial stiffness, functional weakening, and compensatory cardiomyocyte (CM) hypertrophy. Fibroblasts (Fbs) are considered the principal source of ECM, but the contribution of perivascular cells, including pericytes (PCs), has gained attention, since MIF develops primarily around small vessels. The pathogenesis of MIF is difficult to study in humans because of the pleiotropy of mutually influencing pathomechanisms, unpredictable side effects, and the lack of available patient samples. Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) offer the unique opportunity for the de novo formation of bioartificial cardiac tissue (BCT) using a variety of different cardiovascular cell types to model aspects of MIF pathogenesis in vitro. Here, we have optimized a protocol for the derivation of hPSC-derived PC-like cells (iPSC-PCs) and present a BCT in vitro model of MIF that shows their central influence on interstitial collagen deposition and myocardial tissue stiffening. This model was used to study the interplay of different cell types-i.e., hPSC-derived CMs, endothelial cells (ECs), and iPSC-PCs or primary Fbs, respectively. While iPSC-PCs improved the sarcomere structure and supported vascularization in a PC-like fashion, the functional and histological parameters of BCTs revealed EC- and PC-mediated effects on fibrosis-related cardiac tissue remodeling.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac fibroblast; cardiac tissue engineering; iPSC-derived vascular cells; myocardial interstitial fibrosis; pericytes
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33255686 PMCID: PMC7728071 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21238947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1PC-like cells can be efficiently generated from human iPSCs. (A) Schematic representation of the differentiation process depicting the timeline as well as the used small molecules, growth factors, and media. (B) Pluripotency markers OCT4 and NANOG gradually decrease relative to the D0 of differentiation determined by qRT-PCR. Upregulation of early mesodermal marker T, followed by the upregulation of Kinase Insert Domain Receptor (KDR), indicates the induction of mesoderm. Expression levels of PC markers (PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, and NG2) are expressed relative to human placental pericytes (hPC-PLs), and the EC markers (CD31 and CD144) are shown relative to HUVECs [35] (n = 3–6). (C) Flow cytometric analysis for CD31 and PDGFRβ on D7 and D10 in both iPSC lines used for differentiation (n = 3–6). (D) Representative plot of stained (CD31, PDGFRβ) iPSC6-derived cells on differentiation D10 prior to fluorescence-activated cell sorting.
Figure 2iPSC-PCs exhibit a PC-like function and cardiac phenotype. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of the mesenchymal surface marker expression post-maturation on D18 (black line—isotype control) and, (B) following expansion, in P4 (n = 3). (C) The level of PDGFRβ and NG2 in iPSC-PCs (P4) compared to hPC-PL (black line—isotype control). (D) Network formation in fibrin matrices (cultured in EGM-2 for 7 days) containing iPSC-EC only, iPSC-EC+hFF, and iPSC-EC+iPSC-PC, and NG2 expression in the fixed co-cultures. Nuclei stained with DAPI, iPSC-ECs express eGFP (iPSC9_eGFP). Scale bars: 100 µm. (E) Higher magnification Z-stack image of iPSC-EC+iPSC-PC networks with orthogonal projections. (F) PCA plot showing the first two principal components (data points represent one sample in the microarray analysis). (G) Significantly enriched gene ontologies (GOs) in iPSC-PC vs. hPSC (selected genes from the GOs marked with blue, pink, and yellow are shown on plot G). (H) Expression of ECM-related structural genes (blue), cardiac transcription factors (yellow), and immunomodulatory cytokines/receptors (pink) in hPSCs, primary PCs and Fbs, and iPSC-PCs. On the balloon plot, the size of the circles represents the average gene expression of sample groups relative to GAPDH (scaling factor: 300×).
Figure 3iPSC-PCs in cardiac tissues initiate a fibrosis-like remodeling process. (A) Schematic representation of BCT cultivation with growing stretch. (B) 1 × 106 iPSC- or hESC-derived CMs were mixed either with 1 × 105 hFFs or 1 × 105 iPSC-PCs for tissue formation. The colors and symbols serve as legends for the other diagrams of the illustration. (C) Tissue diameter measured on D21 (for C and E–G BCT with iPSC-CM n = 3–6; BCT with hESC-CM n = 9–12 tissues per group) (D) Representative spontaneous contractions normalized to peak height (iPSC-CMs—dashed lines, hESC-CMs. continuous lines). PD—peak duration at 50% and 80% peak height. (E) Frequency of spontaneous contraction before and after force measurement (*** p < 0.001 between indicated groups; ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001 L0 vs. L0 + 1 mm). (F) Force of paced isometric contractions recorded over increasing preload measured on day 21. (G) Passive tension development with increasing preload. (H) Transmission Electron Microscopy of longitudinally sectioned BCTs. Left: hESC-CM+Fb; right: hESC-CM+PC. I: Myofibrils (white arrowheads) are visible in both tissues, however are more regularly distributed in CM+PC, with a higher width and constant Z-lines (arrows), while the fibrils in CM+Fb are narrow and the Z-lines appear out of phase. II: Cell–cell contacts (asterisks, right: enlargement from boxed area in I) are visible in both tissues. III: Collagen fibrils (black arrowheads) are dispersed in CM+Fb, while they are regularly arranged in CM+PC. Scale bars: I, 2 µm; II, 1 µm; III left, 5 µm/inset 1 µm; III right, 1 µm. (I) Masson’s trichrome staining of 7 µm paraffin sections of iPSC-CM BCTs with Fb (left) and iPSC-PC (right) image (scale bar: 100 µm).
Figure 4Fibrosis-related cardiac remodeling in a tri-culture model with ECs. (A) Cell compositions used for tissue preparation. All the BCTs contained 1 × 106 CMs, plus the indicated amount of other cell types. The different colors of the frames serve as legends for the other diagrams of the illustration. (B) Monitoring of tissue remodeling indicated by diameter change over time (n = 3–4). (C) Development of EC networks during cultivation. EC coverage expressed as the percentage of surface area (# p < 0.01 vs. D7). (D) Live imaging of the BCT morphology on D21. CMs are visualized by tetramethylrhodamin-methylester (TMRM, selectively labeling viable mitochondria-rich cells), ECs express endogenous eGFP (scale bar: 100 µm). (E) Immunofluorescent staining for cTnT and VIM to observe cell distribution, nuclei stained by DAPI (scale bar: 100 µm). (F) Directionality analysis of the tissues stained in sub-figure E. The Y-axis label “Amount” represents the proportion of structures with the dominant orientation. (G) Frank–Starling curves recorded on D21. (H) Representative spontaneous contractions normalized to peak height. PD—peak duration at 50% and 80% peak height. (I) Frequency of spontaneous contractions before and after force measurement at 0 and 1 mm preload (## p < 0.01 vs. L0). (J) Calculated elastic modulus (B and G–J: n = 6–12 BCTs per group, * p < 0.05 *** p < 0.001 between indicated groups).
Figure 5BCTs with iPSC-PCs exhibit the molecular signatures of myocardial interstitial fibrosis. (A) PCA plot showing the first two principal components. (B) Vulcano plot showing differences in gene expression between CM+PC+EC and CM+Fb+EC BCTs. The areas above the black curves contain significantly upregulated genes on both sides. Expression of cardiac maturation-related genes (C) in BCTs normalized to hESC-CMs (all genes in C are significant vs. hESC-CMs) and fibrosis-related (D) genes normalized to hRV genes significant vs. hRV are marked by $; ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 between indicated groups; n = 3 in each group. hRV—human right ventricle.