Literature DB >> 33254553

A role of glycation and methylation for SARS-CoV-2 infection in diabetes?

Giovanni Sartore1, Eugenio Ragazzi2, Luca Faccin1, Annunziata Lapolla1.   

Abstract

Type-2 diabetes (T2D) is a major comorbidity of COVID-19, and poorly controlled diabetes is associated with high mortality rate, emphasizing the necessity to improve glycemic control. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the receptor responsible for SARS-CoV-2 access to human cells, and ACE2 expression is increased in patients with diabetes and hypertension treated with ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers. We hypothesize that an upregulation of ACE2 due to its non-enzymatic glycation could be considered, as well as a change of the protein tertiary structure in terms of amino acid (mostly lysine) available to be glycated. In fact, in a single ACE2 molecule, 34 lysine residues are present in the extracellular portion, and at least one of these is co-involved in a fundamental hydrogen-bond interaction with the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD). The worse outcome of COVID-19 in people with diabetes could be related to the non-enzymatic glycation that triggers the activity of ACE2. Moreover, DNA methylation of genes regulating islet beta-cell function, as well as in insulin resistance of peripheral tissues such as liver, muscle, and adipose tissue may be involved, as already demonstrated for cancer conditions. DNA methylation, besides being considered as a biomarker to predict the risk of obesity and T2D, has been suggested also as a target for dietary and pharmacological treatments. The present observations may suggest further interventions in order to improve the outcome of COVID-19 in people affected by diabetes.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACE2; Diabetes; Glycation; Methylation; SARS-CoV-2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33254553      PMCID: PMC7470689          DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


Type-2 diabetes (T2D) is a major comorbidity of COVID-19. In a retrospective multi-center study on 7337 cases of COVID-19 in Hubey (China), among which 952 had pre-existing type-2 diabetes, it has been shown that people with diabetes required more medical intervention, presented a higher multiorgan impairment and mortality rate with respect to patients without diabetes. Furthermore, poorly controlled diabetes, in terms of glycemic variability, was associated with the high mortality rate, emphasizing the necessity to improve glycemic control [1]. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the receptor believed responsible for SARS-CoV-2 access to human cells [2], [3]. ACE2 has also been proposed as a target to identify potential drugs against SARS-CoV-2 infection [4]. Fang et al. [5] in a commentary suggested that people affected by diabetes and hypertension, often treated with drugs such as ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) that upregulate ACE2 receptor expression, may present a higher risk of developing severe and fatal COVID-19. Drugs used for diabetes treatment, such as pioglitazone and liraglutide, could induce increase of ACE2 activity, thus facilitating the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into lung cells, conditioning a more severe and often fatal disease [5], [6]. Debate on the topic is still open, and opposing opinions have been discussed, in particular that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a down-regulation of ACE2 [4], which could be detrimental, because ACE2 represents not only the receptor used by the virus to enter the host’s pneumocytes, but has a role also in lung protection [4]. ACE2 expression is increased in patients with diabetes and hypertension treated with ACE-inhibitors or ARBs, as an adaptive reaction to counteract the high levels of AngII and AngI. Recent studies have evidenced that severely ill patients with COVID-19 present a greater prevalence of hypokaliemia, as result of renal potassium wasting [7]. Alternatively, an upregulation of ACE2 due to its non-enzymatic glycation could be considered. The non-enzymatic glycation of proteins is a process that links chronic hyperglycemia to a series of pathophysiological changes considered important for the development of the chronic complications of diabetes [8]. Glucose can react with a free amino group of several molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids and lipids, to form an unstable aldimine compound, the Schiff base. Following rearrangement, this base produces a stable ketoamine, the Amadori product. Since this reaction does not involve enzymes, the influencing variables are the glucose and protein concentrations; therefore, in diabetes, the presence of elevated levels of glucose makes this reaction very active, leading to irreversible accumulation of altered proteins. In previous studies on non-enzymatic glycation, using an accurate methodology such as mass spectrometry, we have confirmed the in vitro and in vivo non-enzymatic glycation of albumin, showing that the number of glucose molecules that react with the lysine residues of albumin are directly related to the in vitro or in vivo (plasma) glucose levels [9]. Considering now the occurrence of a non-enzymatic glycation of ACE2, its possible pathogenetic role in changing the protein tertiary structure in terms of amino acid (mostly lysine) available to be glycated, needs to be taken into consideration. Looking at the molecular structure (RCSB PDB protein Data Bank id: 6LGZ, DOI: https://doi.org//10.2210/pdb6LZG/pdb), in a single ACE2 molecule, 34 lysine residues are present in the extracellular portion, and at least one of these is co-involved in a fundamental hydrogen-bond interaction with the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) [10]. In diabetes disease also immunoglobulins (IGG) are exposed to high glucose concentrations; utilizing a MALDI/MASS Spectrometry approach we have demonstrated that the number of glucose molecules condensed on IGG are related to the glucose levels and that in the case of poorly controlled diabetes, 20 glucose molecules react non-enzymatically with the lysine residues of IGG [11]. Further experiments on IGG with mass spectrometry and computer-molecular modelling have evidenced that the Fab fragments are more prone to attack by glucose, particularly in the light and heavy variable regions [11]. So, in persons with diabetes the immune deficiencies observed could be due to an extensive glycation of Fab fragment, thus inhibiting the process of molecular recognition between antibody and antigen; this mechanism is consistent with the severe inflammatory state of patients with diabetes affected by COVID-19. Taking into consideration other clinical findings regarding co-morbidities during the epidemic diffusion in China, surveys of cancer patients affected by COVID-19 indicated that lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) was the most frequent tumour type, and such patients presented more severe symptoms [12], [13]. Chai et al. [13] in a bioinformatic evaluation of genetic alteration, RNA expression, and DNA methylation of ACE2 across over 30 tumours, have suggested a link between variations of ACE2 receptors and propensity to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. Regarding the specific mechanisms involved, the study highlighted the fact that although ACE2 expression is upregulated in several cancers, including LUAD, the upregulation is not the result of a genetic variations, but rather is due to epigenetic disorders involving methylation [13]. Moreover, the authors suggest that other mechanisms, including glycosylation [14] could be involved. We here hypothesize that the worse outcome of COVID-19 in people with diabetes could be related, at least in part, to the two mechanisms already suggested for cancer patients, specifically methylation and glycosylation, and in addition to the non-enzymatic glycation as we have discussed above, that could trigger the activity of ACE2. These considerations arise also from the knowledge that diabetes has a strict link with DNA methylation of genes involved in islet beta-cell function, as well as in insulin resistance of peripheral tissues such as liver, muscle, and adipose tissue [15]; moreover the DNA methylation appears as a non-permanent condition, linked also to degree of diabetes control, and a potential target for diabetes control and therapy evaluation [16], [17]. DNA methylation, besides being considered as a biomarker to predict the risk of obesity and T2D, has been suggested also as a target for dietary and pharmacological treatments [18]. On the other side, glycation processes represent one of the most investigated milestones in pathogenesis, evolution and therapeutic target of diabetes [19], [20]. The present observations may suggest further interventions in order to improve the outcome of COVID-19 in people affected by diabetes.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  20 in total

Review 1.  The role of mass spectrometry in the study of non-enzymatic protein glycation in diabetes: an update.

Authors:  Annunziata Lapolla; Domenico Fedele; Roberta Seraglia; Pietro Traldi
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 10.946

2.  Activation of the GLP-1 Receptor by Liraglutide Increases ACE2 Expression, Reversing Right Ventricle Hypertrophy, and Improving the Production of SP-A and SP-B in the Lungs of Type 1 Diabetes Rats.

Authors:  Marina Romaní-Pérez; Verónica Outeiriño-Iglesias; Christian M Moya; Pilar Santisteban; Lucas C González-Matías; Eva Vigo; Federico Mallo
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 3.  AGEs, rather than hyperglycemia, are responsible for microvascular complications in diabetes: a "glycoxidation-centric" point of view.

Authors:  N C Chilelli; S Burlina; A Lapolla
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.222

Review 4.  Glyco-oxidation and cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: a clinical update.

Authors:  Francesco Piarulli; Giovanni Sartore; Annunziata Lapolla
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target.

Authors:  Haibo Zhang; Josef M Penninger; Yimin Li; Nanshan Zhong; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Genetic alteration, RNA expression, and DNA methylation profiling of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) receptor ACE2 in malignancies: a pan-cancer analysis.

Authors:  Peiwei Chai; Jie Yu; Shengfang Ge; Renbing Jia; Xianqun Fan
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 17.388

7.  Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhang; Yaning Li; Renhong Yan; Lu Xia; Yingying Guo; Qiang Zhou
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Association of Blood Glucose Control and Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 and Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Lihua Zhu; Zhi-Gang She; Xu Cheng; Juan-Juan Qin; Xiao-Jing Zhang; Jingjing Cai; Fang Lei; Haitao Wang; Jing Xie; Wenxin Wang; Haomiao Li; Peng Zhang; Xiaohui Song; Xi Chen; Mei Xiang; Chaozheng Zhang; Liangjie Bai; Da Xiang; Ming-Ming Chen; Yanqiong Liu; Youqin Yan; Mingyu Liu; Weiming Mao; Jinjing Zou; Liming Liu; Guohua Chen; Pengcheng Luo; Bing Xiao; Changjiang Zhang; Zixiong Zhang; Zhigang Lu; Junhai Wang; Haofeng Lu; Xigang Xia; Daihong Wang; Xiaofeng Liao; Gang Peng; Ping Ye; Jun Yang; Yufeng Yuan; Xiaodong Huang; Jiao Guo; Bing-Hong Zhang; Hongliang Li
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 27.287

9.  COVID-19, diabetes mellitus and ACE2: The conundrum.

Authors:  Rimesh Pal; Anil Bhansali
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 5.602

10.  Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China.

Authors:  Wenhua Liang; Weijie Guan; Ruchong Chen; Wei Wang; Jianfu Li; Ke Xu; Caichen Li; Qing Ai; Weixiang Lu; Hengrui Liang; Shiyue Li; Jianxing He
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Novel Molecular Evidence Related to COVID-19 in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Yu-Huang Liao; Jing-Quan Zheng; Cai-Mei Zheng; Kuo-Cheng Lu; You-Chen Chao
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  Chest radiological finding of COVID-19 in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: Differences in imaging finding.

Authors:  Sunay Gangadharan; Storm Parker; Fahad Wali Ahmed
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-28

3.  In silico evaluation of the interaction between ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein in a hyperglycemic environment.

Authors:  Giovanni Sartore; Davide Bassani; Eugenio Ragazzi; Pietro Traldi; Annunziata Lapolla; Stefano Moro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Clinical Trials of COVID-19 Therapies Should Account for Diabetes and Hyperglycemia.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Jordan Messler; Timothy Valk; Ram Jagannathan; Francisco J Pasquel; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-23

Review 5.  Consequences of COVID-19 for the Pancreas.

Authors:  Urszula Abramczyk; Maciej Nowaczyński; Adam Słomczyński; Piotr Wojnicz; Piotr Zatyka; Aleksandra Kuzan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Role of Ajwa Date Fruit Pulp and Seed in the Management of Diseases through In Vitro and In Silico Analysis.

Authors:  Shehwaz Anwar; Ravindra Raut; Mohammed A Alsahli; Ahmad Almatroudi; Hani Alfheeaid; Faisal M Alzahrani; Amjad Ali Khan; Khaled S Allemailem; Saleh A Almatroodi; Arshad Husain Rahmani
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2 Virus: In Silico Evaluation of the Possible Impact on People Affected by Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Davide Bassani; Eugenio Ragazzi; Annunziata Lapolla; Giovanni Sartore; Stefano Moro
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.