Literature DB >> 33253332

Evaluation Methods for the Measurement of Lower Leg Edema in Healthy Young Adults.

Masahiro Nishimura1, Toshiaki Kato1, Sho Onodera2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, objective quantitative evaluations have become particularly important. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations are also available for edema. It is thought that the technical problem of quantitative evaluation can be solved by using a simple and reproducible method. Several studies have evaluated various methods for measuring edema. Limitations, such as weaknesses, measurement complexity, and errors, have been identified. Therefore, this study aimed to consider a simple and effective measurement method for the quantitative evaluation of edema.
METHODS: This study was a prospective, observational study. The subjects were 15 healthy adults (2 male and 13 female). Measurements were performed on the subjects' right lower leg once in the morning and once in the afternoon, with a minimum interval of 4 hours.
RESULTS: The actual volume of the lower leg was correlated with all indices except the ultrasonic echo findings for subcutaneous tissue. The intra-subject and inter-subject reliabilities for the indices using digital images were very high. The lower leg volume was greater significantly in the afternoon from the morning.
CONCLUSION: The leg circumference was measured by utilizing a tape, while the width and volume were measured by utilizing digital imaging suitable for quantitatively evaluating edema. Furthermore, swelling of the lower leg with time can occur in the absence of daily exercise. ©2020 Tottori University Medical Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  circumference; diagnostic imaging; edema; leg

Year:  2020        PMID: 33253332      PMCID: PMC7683896          DOI: 10.33160/yam.2020.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonago Acta Med        ISSN: 0513-5710            Impact factor:   1.641


  5 in total

1.  Measurement of ankle joint swelling using a figure of 8*.

Authors:  P S Esterson
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Ultrasonographic findings and the clinical results of treatment for lymphedema.

Authors:  Kiyoaki Niimi; Masafumi Hirai; Hirohide Iwata; Keiko Miyazaki
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-12-25

3.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Comparison of methods to diagnose lymphoedema among breast cancer survivors: 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  Sandi Hayes; Bruce Cornish; Beth Newman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Reliability of the figure-of-eight method of ankle measurement.

Authors:  D Tatro-Adams; S F McGann; W Carbone
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.751

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.