Ibrahim Turkoz1, Larry Alphs2, Jaskaran Singh1, Carol Jamieson3, Ella Daly2, May Shawi2, John J Sheehan2, Madhukar H Trivedi4, A John Rush5,6,7. 1. Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA. 2. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA. 3. Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Milpitas, CA, USA. 4. UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Permian Basin Campus, Odessa, TX, USA. 7. Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To use the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale to estimate clinically meaningful and clinically substantial changes as measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). METHODS: Pooled data were derived from two 4-week, randomized, active-controlled studies evaluating esketamine nasal spray (ESK) plus oral antidepressant (OAD) or OAD plus placebo nasal spray (PBO) in adults with TRD (N = 565). CGI-S, MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 scores were obtained at baseline and over 4 weeks of treatment. In this post hoc analysis, change scores on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 that corresponded to a clinically meaningful (1-point) or clinically substantial (2-point) change on the CGI-S scale were identified. RESULTS: Clinically meaningful changes in CGI-S scores after 28 days corresponded to 6-, 4-, and 3-point changes from baseline on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9, respectively. Similarly, a 2-point CGI-S score change (clinically substantial change) corresponded to a 12-, 8-, and 6-point change on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9, respectively. The proportion of patients showing substantial clinical improvement in the ESK plus OAD group versus the OAD plus PBO group after 28 days of treatment favored ESK plus OAD: 69.0% vs 55.3% (MADRS), 64.5% vs 48.9% (SDS), and 77.1% vs 64.7% (PHQ-9). CONCLUSION: We provide a basis for identifying clinically meaningful and clinically substantial changes as assessed with commonly used outcome measures for depression to facilitate the translation of clinical trial results into clinical practice.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To use the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale to estimate clinically meaningful and clinically substantial changes as measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). METHODS: Pooled data were derived from two 4-week, randomized, active-controlled studies evaluating esketamine nasal spray (ESK) plus oral antidepressant (OAD) or OAD plus placebo nasal spray (PBO) in adults with TRD (N = 565). CGI-S, MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 scores were obtained at baseline and over 4 weeks of treatment. In this post hoc analysis, change scores on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 that corresponded to a clinically meaningful (1-point) or clinically substantial (2-point) change on the CGI-S scale were identified. RESULTS: Clinically meaningful changes in CGI-S scores after 28 days corresponded to 6-, 4-, and 3-point changes from baseline on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9, respectively. Similarly, a 2-point CGI-S score change (clinically substantial change) corresponded to a 12-, 8-, and 6-point change on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9, respectively. The proportion of patients showing substantial clinical improvement in the ESK plus OAD group versus the OAD plus PBO group after 28 days of treatment favored ESK plus OAD: 69.0% vs 55.3% (MADRS), 64.5% vs 48.9% (SDS), and 77.1% vs 64.7% (PHQ-9). CONCLUSION: We provide a basis for identifying clinically meaningful and clinically substantial changes as assessed with commonly used outcome measures for depression to facilitate the translation of clinical trial results into clinical practice.
Authors: Vinita Singh; Theresa W Gillespie; Olabisi Lane; Boris Spektor; Ali John Zarrabi; Katherine Egan; Kimberly Curseen; Maya Tsvetkova; Jan H Beumer; Roman Sniecinski; Jack W Shteamer; Jeffery Switchenko; R Donald Harvey Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: A John Rush; Harold A Sackeim; Charles R Conway; Mark T Bunker; Steven D Hollon; Koen Demyttenaere; Allan H Young; Scott T Aaronson; Maxine Dibué; Michael E Thase; R Hamish McAllister-Williams Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Terje Thesen; Joseph A Himle; Egil W Martinsen; Liv T Walseth; Frode Thorup; Frode Gallefoss; Egil Jonsbu Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 5.428