Literature DB >> 35146776

A dose-escalation clinical trial of intranasal ketamine for uncontrolled cancer-related pain.

Vinita Singh1, Theresa W Gillespie2,3, Olabisi Lane1, Boris Spektor1, Ali John Zarrabi4, Katherine Egan1, Kimberly Curseen4, Maya Tsvetkova5,6, Jan H Beumer5,6,7, Roman Sniecinski1, Jack W Shteamer1, Jeffery Switchenko8, R Donald Harvey2,9.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine safety and pharmacology (pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy) of intranasal (IN) ketamine for uncontrolled cancer-related pain.
DESIGN: Dose escalation clinical trial.
SETTING: Outpatient. PATIENTS: Ten adult patients with uncontrolled cancer-related pain. INTERVENTION: Each patient received escalating doses of ketamine over four visits, each 2-5 days apart: 10 mg IN at visit 1, 10 mg intravenous (IV) at visit 2, 30 mg IN at visit 3, and 50 mg IN at visit 4. MEASUREMENTS: Pain was measured before and after drug administration for up to 4 h using the 11 point (0-10) Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). MAIN
RESULTS: All subjects had advanced cancer, with intractable pain, despite being on moderate dosage of opioids. There was a statistically significant reduction in median NPRS by 1.5 (1-4), 3 (2-3), and 4 (3-5) points at 60 min after receiving the medication and remained decreased by 1.5 (1-2), 2 (1-2) and 1 (1-4) points at the end of the study visit (240 min) with the 10 mg, 30 mg and 50 mg IN dosage, respectively. The median percentage of maximal pain relief being 22.5 (16.6-71.5), 65.5 (40-100), and 69.25 (50-100) for 10 mg, 30 mg and 50 mg IN dosage, respectively and 100 (75-100) with 10 mg IV dose. All side effects (nausea and feeling of unreality) resolved by the end of each study visit. No severe adverse events occurred.
CONCLUSION: In this single-institution study, all dosages of IN ketamine administered in the study (10, 30, and 50 mg) provided significant pain relief for intractable cancer-related pain and were well tolerated. The 50 mg dose provided maximal pain relief without major side effects. Further study focused on repeated administration efficacy and safety for cancer-related pain is warranted.
© 2022 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer pain; intranasal ketamine; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35146776      PMCID: PMC9118341          DOI: 10.1002/phar.2669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   6.251


  42 in total

1.  Meaningful Change in Depression Symptoms Assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Among Patients with Treatment Resistant Depression in Two, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Trials of Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant.

Authors:  Stacie Hudgens; Lysbeth Floden; Michael Blackowicz; Carol Jamieson; Vanina Popova; Maggie Fedgchin; Wayne C Drevets; Kimberly Cooper; Rosanne Lane; Jaskaran Singh
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Ketamine does not increase intracranial pressure compared with opioids: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Xibing Ding; Yao Tong; Jiaying Zong; Xiang Zhao; Hao Ren; Quan Li
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Ketamine*.

Authors:  Rachel Quibell; Eric E Prommer; Mary Mihalyo; Robert Twycross; Andrew Wilcock
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 4.  Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Peter M Fayers; Dagny F Haugen; Augusto Caraceni; Geoffrey W Hanks; Jon H Loge; Robin Fainsinger; Nina Aass; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients.

Authors:  E Bruera; N Kuehn; M J Miller; P Selmser; K Macmillan
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 6.  Intranasal Ketamine and Its Potential Role in Cancer-Related Pain.

Authors:  Vinita Singh; Theresa W Gillespie; Robert Donald Harvey
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.705

7.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.

Authors:  David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain among cancer and non-cancer patients: a literature review.

Authors:  Aaron Woo; Breanne Lechner; Terence Fu; C Shun Wong; Nicholas Chiu; Henry Lam; Natalie Pulenzas; Hany Soliman; Carlo DeAngelis; Edward Chow
Journal:  Ann Palliat Med       Date:  2015-10

9.  Performance Status Assessment by Using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Score for Cancer Patients by Oncology Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Faisal Azam; Muhammad Farooq Latif; Ayesha Farooq; Syed Hammad Tirmazy; Saad AlShahrani; Shahid Bashir; Nedal Bukhari
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2019-09-25

Review 10.  Ketamine Use for Cancer and Chronic Pain Management.

Authors:  Clayton Culp; Hee Kee Kim; Salahadin Abdi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.