Literature DB >> 33249479

Transvenous lead extraction outcomes using a novel hand-powered bidirectional rotational sheath as a first-line extraction tool in a low-volume centre.

Jus Ksela1,2, Jan Prevolnik2, Mark Racman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Extraction of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in low-volume medical centres with limited clinical experience and an evolving lead extraction programme may be challenging. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stepwise transvenous lead extraction (TLE) using a novel type of hand-powered rotational sheath as a first-line tool for extraction of chronically implanted devices in a single, low-volume centre.
METHODS: Sixty-seven consecutive patients undergoing a TLE procedure using the novel Evolution® RL rotational sheath as the first-line extraction tool between 2015 and 2019 at our institution were enrolled in the study. Their short-term and 30-day outcomes were observed.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine devices and 131 leads were explanted. Procedural and clinical success rates were 92.4% and 98.5%, respectively. Two procedures were classified as failures due to lead remnants >4 cm remaining in patients' vascular systems. One major (1.5%) and 3 minor (4.4%) adverse events and no deaths were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: TLE procedures, performed in a stepwise manner, using the Evolution RL sheath as a first-line extraction device and conducted by an experienced, surgically well-trained operator, offer excellent results with clinical and procedural success rates comparable to those, achieved in dedicated, high-volume institutions. Opting for optimal lead extraction approach in low-volume centres or institutions with evolving TLE programmes, a stepwise extraction strategy using the Evolution RL sheath by skilled operator may provide the optimal scheme with an excellent ratio between clinical and/or procedural success and complications.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices; Evolution®; Hand-powered rotational sheath; RL sheath; Transvenous lead extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33249479      PMCID: PMC8906787          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  19 in total

1.  Clinical performance of a new bidirectional rotational mechanical lead extraction sheath.

Authors:  Christoph T Starck; Jan Steffel; Etem Caliskan; Tomas Holubec; Felix Schoenrath; Francesco Maisano; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 2.  2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction.

Authors:  Fred M Kusumoto; Mark H Schoenfeld; Bruce L Wilkoff; Charles I Berul; Ulrika M Birgersdotter-Green; Roger Carrillo; Yong-Mei Cha; Jude Clancy; Jean-Claude Deharo; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Derek Exner; Ayman A Hussein; Charles Kennergren; Andrew Krahn; Richard Lee; Charles J Love; Ruth A Madden; Hector Alfredo Mazzetti; JoEllyn Carol Moore; Jeffrey Parsonnet; Kristen K Patton; Marc A Rozner; Kimberly A Selzman; Morio Shoda; Komandoor Srivathsan; Neil F Strathmore; Charles D Swerdlow; Christine Tompkins; Oussama Wazni
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Reported mortality with rotating sheaths vs. laser sheaths for transvenous lead extraction.

Authors:  Celso L Diaz; Xiaofan Guo; Isaac R Whitman; Gregory M Marcus; Cara N Pellegrini; Ramin E Beygui; Sun Yong Lee; Byron K Lee
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 4.  Safety of transvenous lead extraction according to centre volume: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Di Monaco; Gemma Pelargonio; Maria Lucia Narducci; Lamberto Manzoli; Stefania Boccia; Maria Elena Flacco; Lorenzo Capasso; Lucy Barone; Francesco Perna; Gianluigi Bencardino; Teresa Rio; Milena Leo; Luigi Di Biase; Pasquale Santangeli; Andrea Natale; Antonio Giuseppe Rebuzzi; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Advanced techniques for chronic lead extraction: heading from the laser towards the evolution system.

Authors:  Patrizio Mazzone; Dimitris Tsiachris; Alessandra Marzi; Giuseppe Ciconte; Gabriele Paglino; Nicoleta Sora; Simone Gulletta; Pasquale Vergara; Paolo Della Bella
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction in 108 consecutive patients: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Nadejda Monsefi; Harmeet Singh Waraich; Mate Vamos; Julia Erath; Sami Sirat; Anton Moritz; Stefan H Hohnloser
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-05-01

7.  Safety and Efficacy of Transvenous Lead Extraction Utilizing the Evolution Mechanical Lead Extraction System: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Saumya Sharma; Ijeoma A Ekeruo; Nikita P Nand; Ajay Sundara Raman; Xu Zhang; Sunil K Reddy; Ramesh Hariharan
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-02-19

8.  Success and complication rates of lead extraction with the first- vs. the second-generation Evolution mechanical sheath.

Authors:  Olivier A Witte; Ahmet Adiyaman; Jaap Jan J Smit; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Arif Elvan; Abdul Ghani; Peter Paul H M Delnoy
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Non-laser percutaneous extraction of pacemaker and defibrillation leads: a decade of progress.

Authors:  Giulia Domenichini; Hanney Gonna; Rajan Sharma; Sergio Conti; Lorenzo Fiorista; Sue Jones; Maria Arthur; Shaumik Adhya; Marjan Jahangiri; Edward Rowland; Mark M Gallagher
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 10.  Lead extraction using a laser system: Techniques, efficacy, and limitations.

Authors:  Hideo Okamura
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.