| Literature DB >> 33248898 |
Michael Peer1, Iva K Brunec2, Nora S Newcombe2, Russell A Epstein3.
Abstract
Humans and animals use mental representations of the spatial structure of the world to navigate. The classical view is that these representations take the form of Euclidean cognitive maps, but alternative theories suggest that they are cognitive graphs consisting of locations connected by paths. We review evidence suggesting that both map-like and graph-like representations exist in the mind/brain that rely on partially overlapping neural systems. Maps and graphs can operate simultaneously or separately, and they may be applied to both spatial and nonspatial knowledge. By providing structural frameworks for complex information, cognitive maps and cognitive graphs may provide fundamental organizing schemata that allow us to navigate in physical, social, and conceptual spaces.Entities:
Keywords: grid cells; hippocampus; memory; retrosplenial complex; semantic knowledge; spatial navigation; visual scenes
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33248898 PMCID: PMC7746605 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Cogn Sci ISSN: 1364-6613 Impact factor: 20.229