Literature DB >> 34473949

The human brain uses spatial schemas to represent segmented environments.

Michael Peer1, Russell A Epstein2.   

Abstract

Humans and animals use cognitive maps to represent the spatial structure of the environment. Although these maps are typically conceptualized as extending in an equipotential manner across known space, psychological evidence suggests that people mentally segment complex environments into subspaces. To understand the neurocognitive mechanisms behind this operation, we familiarized participants with a virtual courtyard that was divided into two halves by a river; we then used behavioral testing and fMRI to understand how spatial locations were encoded within this environment. Participants' spatial judgments and multivoxel activation patterns were affected by the division of the courtyard, indicating that the presence of a boundary can induce mental segmentation even when all parts of the environment are co-visible. In the hippocampus and occipital place area (OPA), the segmented organization of the environment manifested in schematic spatial codes that represented geometrically equivalent locations in the two subspaces as similar. In the retrosplenial complex (RSC), responses were more consistent with an integrated spatial map. These results demonstrate that people use both local spatial schemas and integrated spatial maps to represent segmented environment. We hypothesize that schematization may serve as a general mechanism for organizing complex knowledge structures in terms of their component elements.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OPA; RSC; cognitive map; fMRI; hippocampus; scene perception; spatial memory

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34473949      PMCID: PMC8578397          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  119 in total

1.  Multiple systems of spatial memory: evidence from described scenes.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Common Neural Representations for Visually Guided Reorientation and Spatial Imagery.

Authors:  Lindsay K Vass; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Fragmentation of grid cell maps in a multicompartment environment.

Authors:  Dori Derdikman; Jonathan R Whitlock; Albert Tsao; Marianne Fyhn; Torkel Hafting; May-Britt Moser; Edvard I Moser
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-13       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Boundaries Shape Cognitive Representations of Spaces and Events.

Authors:  Iva K Brunec; Morris Moscovitch; Morgan D Barense
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Statistical learning of temporal community structure in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Anna C Schapiro; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Kenneth A Norman; Matthew M Botvinick
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Independent coding of connected environments by place cells.

Authors:  V Paz-Villagrán; E Save; B Poucet
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  An essay concerning human understanding: how the cerebri anatome of Thomas Willis influenced John Locke.

Authors:  Bradley C Lega
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  The Neurocognitive Basis of Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Joshua B Julian; Alexandra T Keinath; Steven A Marchette; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Challenges for identifying the neural mechanisms that support spatial navigation: the impact of spatial scale.

Authors:  Thomas Wolbers; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Object representations in the human brain reflect the co-occurrence statistics of vision and language.

Authors:  Michael F Bonner; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.