Literature DB >> 33246926

Risk for cardiovascular events following 'microsize' versus usual myocardial infarctions.

Zaid I Almarzooq1, Lisandro D Colantonio2, Peter M Okin3, Joshua S Richman4, Todd M Brown5, Emily B Levitan2, Joanna Bryan6, Monika M Safford7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microsize myocardial infarction (MI) is a recently described phenomenon that meets rigorous criteria for MI with very low peak troponin elevations. We aim to compare the risk for cardiovascular events and mortality following microsize versus usual MIs. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Prospective cohort analysis of REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study participants without a history of coronary heart disease (CHD) who had an incident MI between 2003 and 2015. Incident MIs were classified as microsize MI (peak troponin <0.5 ng/mL) or usual MI (peak troponin ≥0.5 ng/mL). Participants were followed for a composite of cardiovascular events that included recurrent MI, coronary revascularisation, fatal CHD and heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Overall, 1024 participants with an incident MI were included in the analysis (328 with microsize MI and 696 with usual MI). Participants with microsize MI were more likely to be older and black. The multivariable-adjusted adjustment HR for cardiovascular events among participants with microsize versus usual MI after a median follow-up of 1.7 years was 1.11 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.44). The multivariable-adjusted HR for all-cause mortality after 28 days from incident MI among participants with microsize versus usual MI after a median follow-up of 3.6 years was 1.09 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.45).
CONCLUSION: Microsize MIs have a prognostic value for future cardiovascular events and mortality comparable to usual MIs. These findings should encourage clinicians to initiate secondary prevention strategies in patients with microsize MI until this emerging clinical entity is better understood. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute myocardial infarction; coronary artery disease; quality and outcomes of care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33246926      PMCID: PMC8257556          DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  17 in total

1.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Case definitions for acute coronary heart disease in epidemiology and clinical research studies: a statement from the AHA Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; AHA Statistics Committee; World Heart Federation Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Epidemiology and Prevention; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Russell V Luepker; Fred S Apple; Robert H Christenson; Richard S Crow; Stephen P Fortmann; David Goff; Robert J Goldberg; Mary M Hand; Allan S Jaffe; Desmond G Julian; Daniel Levy; Teri Manolio; Shanthi Mendis; George Mensah; Andrzej Pajak; Ronald J Prineas; K Srinath Reddy; Veronique L Roger; Wayne D Rosamond; Eyal Shahar; A Richey Sharrett; Paul Sorlie; Hugh Tunstall-Pedoe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and IFCC Committee for Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: analytical issues for biochemical markers of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Fred S Apple; Robert L Jesse; L Kristin Newby; Alan H B Wu; Robert H Christenson; Christopher P Cannon; Gary Francis; David A Morrow; Jan Ravkilde; Alan B Storrow; Wilson Tang; Allan S Jaffe; Johannes Mair; Jordi Ordonez-Llanos; Franca Pagani; Mauro Panteghini; Jillian Tate
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 4.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard R Chaitman; Jeroen J Bax; David A Morrow; Harvey D White
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Hugo A Katus; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Robert O Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasché; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; José-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study: objectives and design.

Authors:  Virginia J Howard; Mary Cushman; Leavonne Pulley; Camilo R Gomez; Rodney C Go; Ronald J Prineas; Andra Graham; Claudia S Moy; George Howard
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Risk factors for 'microsize' vs. usual myocardial infarctions in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

Authors:  Zaid I Almarzooq; Lisandro D Colantonio; Peter M Okin; Joshua S Richman; Todd M Brown; Emily B Levitan; Joanna Bryan; Monika M Safford
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2019-10-01

8.  Implementation of a sensitive troponin I assay and risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and death in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Nicholas L Mills; Antonia M D Churchhouse; Kuan Ken Lee; Atul Anand; David Gamble; Anoop S V Shah; Elspeth Paterson; Margaret MacLeod; Catriona Graham; Simon Walker; Martin A Denvir; Keith A A Fox; David E Newby
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Use of guidelines-recommended management and outcomes among women and men with low-level troponin elevation: insights from CRUSADE.

Authors:  Sharif A Halim; Jyotsna Mulgund; Anita Y Chen; Matthew T Roe; Eric D Peterson; W Brian Gibler; E Magnus Ohman; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-04-28

Review 10.  Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Acute Nonischemic Myocardial Injury.

Authors:  Andrew P DeFilippis; Andrew R Chapman; Nicholas L Mills; James A de Lemos; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; L Kristin Newby; David A Morrow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.