Literature DB >> 21427373

Implementation of a sensitive troponin I assay and risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and death in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Nicholas L Mills1, Antonia M D Churchhouse, Kuan Ken Lee, Atul Anand, David Gamble, Anoop S V Shah, Elspeth Paterson, Margaret MacLeod, Catriona Graham, Simon Walker, Martin A Denvir, Keith A A Fox, David E Newby.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although troponin assays have become increasingly more sensitive, it is unclear whether further reductions in the threshold of detection for plasma troponin concentrations will improve clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether lowering the diagnostic threshold for myocardial infarction (MI) with a sensitive troponin assay could improve clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: All consecutive patients admitted with suspected ACS to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, before (n = 1038; February 1-July 31, 2008, during the validation phase) and after (n = 1054; February 1-July 31, 2009, during the implementation phase) lowering the threshold of detection for myocardial necrosis from 0.20 to 0.05 ng/mL with a sensitive troponin I assay were stratified into 3 groups (<0.05 ng/mL, 0.05-0.19 ng/mL, and ≥0.20 ng/mL). During the validation phase, only concentrations above the original diagnostic threshold of 0.20 ng/mL were reported to clinicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Event-free survival (recurrent MI and death) at 1 year in patients grouped by plasma troponin concentrations.
RESULTS: Plasma troponin concentrations were less than 0.05 ng/mL in 1340 patients (64%), 0.05 to 0.19 ng/mL in 170 patients (8%), and 0.20 ng/mL or more in 582 patients (28%). During the validation phase, 39% of patients with plasma troponin concentrations of 0.05 to 0.19 ng/mL were dead or had recurrent MI at 1 year compared with 7% and 24% of those patients with troponin concentrations of less than 0.05 ng/mL (P < .001) or 0.20 ng/mL or more (P = .007), respectively. During the implementation phase, lowering the diagnostic threshold to 0.05 ng/mL was associated with a lower risk of death and recurrent MI (from 39% to 21%) in patients with troponin concentrations of 0.05 to 0.19 ng/mL (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.84; P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected ACS, implementation of a sensitive troponin assay increased the diagnosis of MI and identified patients at high risk of recurrent MI and death. Lowering the diagnostic threshold of plasma troponin was associated with major reductions in morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21427373     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  67 in total

Review 1.  Acute coronary syndromes in 2011: Walking the tightrope between efficacy and bleeding.

Authors:  Payal Kohli; Christopher P Cannon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Does a lower diagnostic threshold of sensitive plasma troponin I assay improve clinical outcomes of patients with chest pain?

Authors:  Francesca Perego; Franca Dipaola
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Biomarkers: Troponin testing--risk stratification to stratified medicine.

Authors:  L Kristin Newby; E Magnus Ohman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Effectiveness of practices for improving the diagnostic accuracy of Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices™ systematic review.

Authors:  Christopher Layfield; John Rose; Aaron Alford; Susan R Snyder; Fred S Apple; Farah M Chowdhury; Michael C Kontos; L Kristin Newby; Alan B Storrow; Milenko Tanasijevic; Elizabeth Leibach; Edward B Liebow; Robert H Christenson
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 5.  Coronary heart disease risk factors and outcomes in the twenty-first century: findings from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study.

Authors:  Hemal Bhatt; Monika Safford; Stephen Glasser
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Prognostic relevance of PCI-related myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Pier Woudstra; Maik J Grundeken; Tim P van de Hoef; Lars Wallentin; Keith A Fox; Robbert J de Winter; Peter Damman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Prognostic value of cardiac troponin T after myocardial infarction: a contemporary community experience.

Authors:  Yariv Gerber; Allan S Jaffe; Susan A Weston; Ruoxiang Jiang; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 9.  Advances in diagnostics for transplant rejection.

Authors:  Michael Nasr; Tara Sigdel; Minnie Sarwal
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.225

10.  Chest pain and acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians admitted to the Emergency Department.

Authors:  James Samir Díaz-Betancur; Juan Manuel Martínez; Juan Gabriel Zapata; Isabel Marín-Orozco
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.