Literature DB >> 33245059

Intensity non-uniformity correction in MR imaging using residual cycle generative adversarial network.

Xianjin Dai1, Yang Lei1, Yingzi Liu1, Tonghe Wang1, Lei Ren2, Walter J Curran1, Pretesh Patel1, Tian Liu1, Xiaofeng Yang1.   

Abstract

Correcting or reducing the effects of voxel intensity non-uniformity (INU) within a given tissue type is a crucial issue for quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) image analysis in daily clinical practice. Although having no severe impact on visual diagnosis, the INU can highly degrade the performance of automatic quantitative analysis such as segmentation, registration, feature extraction and radiomics. In this study, we present an advanced deep learning based INU correction algorithm called residual cycle generative adversarial network (res-cycle GAN), which integrates the residual block concept into a cycle-consistent GAN (cycle-GAN). In cycle-GAN, an inverse transformation was implemented between the INU uncorrected and corrected magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images to constrain the model through forcing the calculation of both an INU corrected MRI and a synthetic corrected MRI. A fully convolution neural network integrating residual blocks was applied in the generator of cycle-GAN to enhance end-to-end raw MRI to INU corrected MRI transformation. A cohort of 55 abdominal patients with T1-weighted MR INU images and their corrections with a clinically established and commonly used method, namely, N4ITK were used as a pair to evaluate the proposed res-cycle GAN based INU correction algorithm. Quantitatively comparisons of normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), normalized cross-correlation (NCC) indices, and spatial non-uniformity (SNU) were made among the proposed method and other approaches. Our res-cycle GAN based method achieved an NMAE of 0.011 ± 0.002, a PSNR of 28.0 ± 1.9 dB, an NCC of 0.970 ± 0.017, and a SNU of 0.298 ± 0.085. Our proposed method has significant improvements (p < 0.05) in NMAE, PSNR, NCC and SNU over other algorithms including conventional GAN and U-net. Once the model is well trained, our approach can automatically generate the corrected MR images in a few minutes, eliminating the need for manual setting of parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33245059      PMCID: PMC7934018          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb31f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  41 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features.

Authors:  S Agliozzo; M De Luca; C Bracco; A Vignati; V Giannini; L Martincich; L A Carbonaro; A Bert; F Sardanelli; D Regge
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation.

Authors:  S Ogawa; T M Lee; A R Kay; D W Tank
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: LAVA-Flex compared with conventional fat suppression T1-weighted images.

Authors:  Xing Hui Li; Jiang Zhu; Xiao Ming Zhang; Yi Fan Ji; Tian Wu Chen; Xiao Hua Huang; Lin Yang; Nan Lin Zeng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Intensity correction of phased-array surface coil images.

Authors:  J W Murakami; C E Hayes; E Weinberger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Intensity inhomogeneity correction of MRI images using InhomoNet.

Authors:  Vishal Venkatesh; Neeraj Sharma; Munendra Singh
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Intensity correction in surface-coil MR imaging.

Authors:  L Axel; J Costantini; J Listerud
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Paired cycle-GAN-based image correction for quantitative cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Joseph Harms; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Rongxiao Zhang; Jun Zhou; Xiangyang Tang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Context Dependent Fuzzy Associated Statistical Model for Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction From Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Badri Narayan Subudhi; T Veerakumar; S Esakkirajan; Ashish Ghosh
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.316

10.  Texture features on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: new potential biomarkers for prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  A Vignati; S Mazzetti; V Giannini; F Russo; E Bollito; F Porpiglia; M Stasi; D Regge
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  2 in total

1.  Deep learning network for integrated coil inhomogeneity correction and brain extraction of mixed MRI data.

Authors:  Kai-Hsiang Chuang; Pei-Huan Wu; Zengmin Li; Kang-Hsing Fan; Jun-Cheng Weng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  A review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation.

Authors:  Yabo Fu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.685

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.