Literature DB >> 33244691

Aquatic plants and ecotoxicological assessment in freshwater ecosystems: a review.

Simona Ceschin1, Amii Bellini2, Massimiliano Scalici1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the current state-of-the-art, limitations, critical issues, and new directions in freshwater plant ecotoxicology. We selected peer-reviewed studies using relevant databases and for each (1) publication year, (2) test plant species, (3) reference plant group (microalgae, macroalgae, bryophytes, pteridophytes, flowering plants), (4) toxicant tested (heavy metal, pharmaceutical product, hydrocarbon, pesticide, surfactant, plastic), (5) experiment site (laboratory, field), and (6) toxicant exposure duration. Although aquatic plant organisms play a key role in the functioning of freshwater ecosystems, mainly linked to their primary productivity, their use as biological models in ecotoxicological tests was limited if compared to animals. Also, toxicant effects on freshwater plants were scarcely investigated and limited to studies on microalgae (80%), or only to a certain number of recurrent species (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Chlorella vulgaris, Lemna minor, Myriophyllum spicatum). The most widely tested toxicants on plants were heavy metals (74%), followed by pharmaceutical products and hydrocarbons (7%), while the most commonly utilized endpoints in tests were plant growth inhibition, variations in dry or fresh weight, morpho-structural alterations, chlorosis, and/or necrosis. The main critical issues emerged from plant-based ecotoxicological tests were the narrow range of species and endpoints considered, the lack of environmental relevance, the excessively short exposure times, and the culture media potentially reacting with toxicants. Proposals to overcome these issues are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic ecosystem; Ecotoxicology; Freshwater plant organisms; Plant-based ecotoxicological test; Toxicant; Water contamination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33244691      PMCID: PMC7838074          DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11496-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   5.190


  73 in total

1.  Biological treatment of wastewater by selected aquatic plants.

Authors:  B D Tripathi; S C Shukla
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Four selected high molecular weight heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Ecotoxicological hazard assessment, environmental relevance and regulatory needs under REACH.

Authors:  Stephan Brendel; Christian Polleichtner; Andreas Behnke; Sönke Jessel; Enken Hassold; Christian Jennemann; Doreen Einhenkel-Arle; Albrecht Seidel
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Does intraspecific variability matter in ecological risk assessment? Investigation of genotypic variations in three macrophyte species exposed to copper.

Authors:  Eva Roubeau Dumont; Camille Larue; Sophie Lorber; Hervé Gryta; Elise Billoir; Elisabeth Maria Gross; Arnaud Elger
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Duckweed Lemna minor as a tool for testing toxicity and genotoxicity of surface waters.

Authors:  S Radić; D Stipaničev; P Cvjetko; M Marijanović Rajčić; S Sirac; B Pevalek-Kozlina; M Pavlica
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 6.291

5.  Microcosm evaluation of the effects of an eight pharmaceutical mixture to the aquatic macrophytes Lemna gibba and Myriophyllum sibiricum.

Authors:  Richard A Brain; David J Johnson; Sean M Richards; Mark L Hanson; Hans Sanderson; Monica W Lam; Cora Young; Scott A Mabury; Paul K Sibley; Keith R Solomon
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Impacts of the mycotoxin zearalenone on growth and photosynthetic responses in laboratory populations of freshwater macrophytes (Lemna minor) and microalgae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata).

Authors:  Emily J Eagles; Rachel Benstead; Susan MacDonald; Richard Handy; Thomas H Hutchinson
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Pilot-scale comparison of four duckweed strains from different genera for potential application in nutrient recovery from wastewater and valuable biomass production.

Authors:  Y Zhao; Y Fang; Y Jin; J Huang; S Bao; T Fu; Z He; F Wang; M Wang; H Zhao
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.081

8.  Heterocyclic compounds: toxic effects using algae, daphnids, and the Salmonella/microsome test taking methodical quantitative aspects into account.

Authors:  Adolf Eisentraeger; Corinna Brinkmann; Henner Hollert; Anne Sagner; Andreas Tiehm; Judith Neuwoehner
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Response of the zooplankton community and environmental fate of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid in aquatic microcosms.

Authors:  Timothy M Boudreau; Christian J Wilson; Woo Jay Cheong; Paul K Sibley; Scott A Mabury; Derek C G Muir; Keith R Solomon
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Anthracene phytotoxicity in the freshwater flagellate alga Euglena agilis Carter.

Authors:  Sreejith Kottuparambil; Jihae Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Aquatic Toxicity Effects and Risk Assessment of 'Form Specific' Product-Released Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Raisibe Florence Lehutso; James Wesley-Smith; Melusi Thwala
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Improving plant-based genotoxicity bioassay through AFLP technique for trace metal-contaminated water: insights from Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc. and Cd.

Authors:  Andrea Coppi; Ilaria Colzi; Lorenzo Lastrucci; Maria Beatrice Castellani; Cristina Gonnelli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 5.190

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.