Literature DB >> 33243368

Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER RCT.

Adrian H Taylor1, Rod S Taylor2,3, Wendy M Ingram1, Nana Anokye4, Sarah Dean2, Kate Jolly5, Nanette Mutrie6, Jeffrey Lambert2,7, Lucy Yardley8,9, Colin Greaves2,10, Jennie King1, Chloe McAdam6, Mary Steele9, Lisa Price2, Adam Streeter1, Nigel Charles, Rohini Terry2, Douglas Webb1,11, John Campbell2, Lucy Hughes5, Ben Ainsworth9,12, Ben Jones1, Ben Jane13, Jo Erwin14, Paul Little9, Anthony Woolf14, Chris Cavanagh15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is modest evidence that exercise referral schemes increase physical activity in inactive individuals with chronic health conditions. There is a need to identify additional ways to improve the effects of exercise referral schemes on long-term physical activity.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if adding the e-coachER intervention to exercise referral schemes is more clinically effective and cost-effective in increasing physical activity after 1 year than usual exercise referral schemes.
DESIGN: A pragmatic, multicentre, two-arm randomised controlled trial, with a mixed-methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants were allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio to either exercise referral schemes plus e-coachER (intervention) or exercise referral schemes alone (control).
SETTING: Patients were referred to exercise referral schemes in Plymouth, Birmingham and Glasgow. PARTICIPANTS: There were 450 participants aged 16-74 years, with a body mass index of 30-40 kg/m2, with hypertension, prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, lower limb osteoarthritis or a current/recent history of treatment for depression, who were also inactive, contactable via e-mail and internet users. INTERVENTION: e-coachER was designed to augment exercise referral schemes. Participants received a pedometer and fridge magnet with physical activity recording sheets, and a user guide to access the web-based support in the form of seven 'steps to health'. e-coachER aimed to build the use of behavioural skills (e.g. self-monitoring) while strengthening favourable beliefs in the importance of physical activity, competence, autonomy in physical activity choices and relatedness. All participants were referred to a standard exercise referral scheme. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity in ≥ 10-minute bouts measured by an accelerometer over 1 week at 12 months, worn ≥ 16 hours per day for ≥ 4 days including ≥ 1 weekend day. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Other accelerometer-derived physical activity measures, self-reported physical activity, exercise referral scheme attendance and EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were collected at 4 and 12 months post randomisation.
RESULTS: Participants had a mean body mass index of 32.6 (standard deviation) 4.4 kg/m2, were referred primarily for weight loss and were mostly confident self-rated information technology users. Primary outcome analysis involving those with usable data showed a weak indicative effect in favour of the intervention group (n = 108) compared with the control group (n = 124); 11.8 weekly minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (95% confidence interval -2.1 to 26.0 minutes; p = 0.10). Sixty-four per cent of intervention participants logged on at least once; they gave generally positive feedback on the web-based support. The intervention had no effect on other physical activity outcomes, exercise referral scheme attendance (78% in the control group vs. 75% in the intervention group) or EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores, but did enhance a number of process outcomes (i.e. confidence, importance and competence) compared with the control group at 4 months, but not at 12 months. At 12 months, the intervention group incurred an additional mean cost of £439 (95% confidence interval -£182 to £1060) compared with the control group, but generated more quality-adjusted life-years (mean 0.026, 95% confidence interval 0.013 to 0.040), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of an additional £16,885 per quality-adjusted life-year. LIMITATIONS: A significant proportion (46%) of participants were not included in the primary analysis because of study withdrawal and insufficient device wear-time, so the results must be interpreted with caution. The regression model fit for the primary outcome was poor because of the considerable proportion of participants [142/243 (58%)] who recorded no instances of ≥ 10-minute bouts of moderate and vigorous physical activity at 12 months post randomisation. FUTURE WORK: The design and rigorous evaluation of cost-effective and scalable ways to increase exercise referral scheme uptake and maintenance of moderate and vigorous physical activity are needed among patients with chronic conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Adding e-coachER to usual exercise referral schemes had only a weak indicative effect on long-term rigorously defined, objectively assessed moderate and vigorous physical activity. The provision of the e-coachER support package led to an additional cost and has a 63% probability of being cost-effective based on the UK threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. The intervention did improve some process outcomes as specified in our logic model. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15644451. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 63. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACCELEROMETER; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DEPRESSION; DIABETES; E-HEALTH; EXERCISE; HYPERTENSION; OBESITY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIMARY CARE

Year:  2020        PMID: 33243368      PMCID: PMC7750864          DOI: 10.3310/hta24630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  58 in total

1.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  An internet-based intervention with brief nurse support to manage obesity in primary care (POWeR+): a pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul Little; Beth Stuart; Fd Richard Hobbs; Jo Kelly; Emily R Smith; Katherine J Bradbury; Stephanie Hughes; Peter W F Smith; Michael V Moore; Mike E J Lean; Barrie M Margetts; Chris D Byrne; Simon Griffin; Mina Davoudianfar; Julie Hooper; Guiqing Yao; Shihua Zhu; James Raftery; Lucy Yardley
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 32.069

3.  A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity.

Authors:  Ester Cerin; David P Mackinnon
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 4.  Levels and predictors of exercise referral scheme uptake and adherence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Toby Pavey; Adrian Taylor; Melvyn Hillsdon; Kenneth Fox; John Campbell; Charlie Foster; Tiffany Moxham; Nanette Mutrie; John Searle; Rod Taylor
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions.

Authors:  Colin J Greaves; Kate E Sheppard; Charles Abraham; Wendy Hardeman; Michael Roden; Philip H Evans; Peter Schwarz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).

Authors:  M Herdman; C Gudex; A Lloyd; Mf Janssen; P Kind; D Parkin; G Bonsel; X Badia
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The person-based approach to intervention development: application to digital health-related behavior change interventions.

Authors:  Lucy Yardley; Leanne Morrison; Katherine Bradbury; Ingrid Muller
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  Are brief interventions to increase physical activity cost-effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Vijay GC; Edward C F Wilson; Marc Suhrcke; Wendy Hardeman; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England.

Authors:  Nancy J Devlin; Koonal K Shah; Yan Feng; Brendan Mulhern; Ben van Hout
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.

Authors:  Graham F Moore; Suzanne Audrey; Mary Barker; Lyndal Bond; Chris Bonell; Wendy Hardeman; Laurence Moore; Alicia O'Cathain; Tannaze Tinati; Daniel Wight; Janis Baird
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-03-19
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Telemonitoring for the Follow-Up of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Treated with CPAP: Accuracy and Impact on Therapy.

Authors:  Cécile Dusart; Stéphanie Andre; Thomas Mettay; Marie Bruyneel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Economic evaluation of physical activity interventions for type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Barbosa; Stephen Whiting; Ding Ding; João Brito; Romeu Mendes
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  A process evaluation, with mediation analysis, of a web-based intervention to augment primary care exercise referral schemes: the e-coachER randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lambert; Adrian Taylor; Adam Streeter; Colin Greaves; Wendy M Ingram; Sarah Dean; Kate Jolly; Nanette Mutrie; Rod S Taylor; Lucy Yardley; Lisa Price; John Campbell
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.915

4.  Systematic review of process evaluations of interventions in trials investigating sedentary behaviour in adults.

Authors:  Jessica Faye Johansson; Natalie Lam; Seline Ozer; Jennifer Hall; Sarah Morton; Coralie English; Claire F Fitzsimons; Rebecca Lawton; Anne Forster; David Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.