William M Stoy1, Bo Yang2, Ali Kight1, Nathaniel C Wright1, Peter Y Borden1, Garrett B Stanley1, Craig R Forest3. 1. Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States. 2. George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States. 3. Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States; George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: cforest@gatech.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whole-cell patch-clamp recording in vivo is the gold-standard method for measuring subthreshold electrophysiology from single cells during behavioural tasks, sensory stimulations, and optogenetic manipulation. However, these recordings require a tight, gigaohm resistance, seal between a glass pipette electrode's aperture and a cell's membrane. These seals are difficult to form, especially in vivo, in part because of a strong dependence on the distance between the pipette aperture and cell membrane. NEW METHOD: We elucidate and utilize this dependency to develop an autonomous method for placement and synchronization of pipette's tip aperture to the membrane of a nearby, moving neuron, which enables high-yield seal formation and subsequent recordings deep in the brain of the living mouse. RESULTS: This synchronization procedure nearly doubles the reported gigaseal yield in the thalamus (>3 mm below the pial surface) from 26 % (n = 17/64) to 48 % (n = 32/66). Whole-cell recording yield improved from 10 % (n = 9/88) to 24 % (n = 18/76) when motion compensation was used during the gigaseal formation. As an example of its application, we utilized this system to investigate the role of the sensory environment and ventral posterior medial region (VPM) projection synchrony on intracellular dynamics in the barrel cortex. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Current methods of in vivo whole-cell patch clamping do not synchronize the position of the pipette to motion of the cell. CONCLUSIONS: This method results in substantially greater subcortical whole-cell recording yield than previously reported and thus makes pan-brain whole-cell electrophysiology practical in the living mouse brain.
BACKGROUND: Whole-cell patch-clamp recording in vivo is the gold-standard method for measuring subthreshold electrophysiology from single cells during behavioural tasks, sensory stimulations, and optogenetic manipulation. However, these recordings require a tight, gigaohm resistance, seal between a glass pipette electrode's aperture and a cell's membrane. These seals are difficult to form, especially in vivo, in part because of a strong dependence on the distance between the pipette aperture and cell membrane. NEW METHOD: We elucidate and utilize this dependency to develop an autonomous method for placement and synchronization of pipette's tip aperture to the membrane of a nearby, moving neuron, which enables high-yield seal formation and subsequent recordings deep in the brain of the living mouse. RESULTS: This synchronization procedure nearly doubles the reported gigaseal yield in the thalamus (>3 mm below the pial surface) from 26 % (n = 17/64) to 48 % (n = 32/66). Whole-cell recording yield improved from 10 % (n = 9/88) to 24 % (n = 18/76) when motion compensation was used during the gigaseal formation. As an example of its application, we utilized this system to investigate the role of the sensory environment and ventral posterior medial region (VPM) projection synchrony on intracellular dynamics in the barrel cortex. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Current methods of in vivo whole-cell patch clamping do not synchronize the position of the pipette to motion of the cell. CONCLUSIONS: This method results in substantially greater subcortical whole-cell recording yield than previously reported and thus makes pan-brain whole-cell electrophysiology practical in the living mouse brain.
Authors: W A Stoy; I Kolb; G L Holst; Y Liew; A Pala; B Yang; E S Boyden; G B Stanley; C R Forest Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah; Gregory L Holst; Ian R Wickersham; Annabelle C Singer; Giovanni Talei Franzesi; Michael L McKinnon; Craig R Forest; Edward S Boyden Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Nathaniel C Wright; Peter Y Borden; Yi Juin Liew; Michael F Bolus; William M Stoy; Craig R Forest; Garrett B Stanley Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 6.709