Literature DB >> 33242421

Behavioral, Physiological, and Neural Signatures of Surprise during Naturalistic Sports Viewing.

James W Antony1, Thomas H Hartshorne2, Ken Pomeroy3, Todd M Gureckis4, Uri Hasson5, Samuel D McDougle6, Kenneth A Norman5.   

Abstract

Surprise signals a discrepancy between past and current beliefs. It is theorized to be linked to affective experiences, the creation of particularly resilient memories, and segmentation of the flow of experience into discrete perceived events. However, the ability to precisely measure naturalistic surprise has remained elusive. We used advanced basketball analytics to derive a quantitative measure of surprise and characterized its behavioral, physiological, and neural correlates in human subjects observing basketball games. We found that surprise was associated with segmentation of ongoing experiences, as reflected by subjectively perceived event boundaries and shifts in neocortical patterns underlying belief states. Interestingly, these effects differed by whether surprising moments contradicted or bolstered current predominant beliefs. Surprise also positively correlated with pupil dilation, activation in subcortical regions associated with dopamine, game enjoyment, and long-term memory. These investigations support key predictions from event segmentation theory and extend theoretical conceptualizations of surprise to real-world contexts.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dopamine; event perception; fMRI; memory; naturalistic stimuli; prediction error; pupil dilation; reinforcement learning; sports psychology; surprise

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33242421     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  16 in total

1.  INCloud: integrated neuroimaging cloud for data collection, management, analysis and clinical translations.

Authors:  Qingfeng Li; Lijuan Jiang; Kaini Qiao; Yang Hu; Bing Chen; Xiaochen Zhang; Yue Ding; Zhi Yang; Chunbo Li
Journal:  Gen Psychiatr       Date:  2021-12-23

2.  The effects of domain knowledge and event structure on event processing.

Authors:  Daniel P Feller; Christopher A Kurby; Kimberly M Newberry; Stephan Schwan; Joseph P Magliano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-04-06

3.  Mnemonic prediction errors promote detailed memories.

Authors:  Oded Bein; Natalie A Plotkin; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  A neural network model of when to retrieve and encode episodic memories.

Authors:  Qihong Lu; Uri Hasson; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  High-Order Areas and Auditory Cortex Both Represent the High-Level Event Structure of Music.

Authors:  Jamal A Williams; Elizabeth H Margulis; Samuel A Nastase; Janice Chen; Uri Hasson; Kenneth A Norman; Christopher Baldassano
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.420

6.  Default and control network connectivity dynamics track the stream of affect at multiple timescales.

Authors:  Giada Lettieri; Giacomo Handjaras; Francesca Setti; Elisa Morgana Cappello; Valentina Bruno; Matteo Diano; Andrea Leo; Emiliano Ricciardi; Pietro Pietrini; Luca Cecchetti
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.235

7.  The hippocampus constructs narrative memories across distant events.

Authors:  Brendan I Cohn-Sheehy; Angelique I Delarazan; Zachariah M Reagh; Jordan E Crivelli-Decker; Kamin Kim; Alexander J Barnett; Jeffrey M Zacks; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 10.900

8.  Neural signatures of attentional engagement during narratives and its consequences for event memory.

Authors:  Hayoung Song; Emily S Finn; Monica D Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The orbitofrontal cortex represents advantageous choice in the Iowa gambling task.

Authors:  Rujing Zha; Peng Li; Ying Liu; Abdulqawi Alarefi; Xiaochu Zhang; Jun Li
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.399

10.  The limited reach of surprise: Evidence against effects of surprise on memory for preceding elements of an event.

Authors:  Aya Ben-Yakov; Verity Smith; Richard Henson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.