Literature DB >> 33239353

How does occupational physical activity influence health? An umbrella review of 23 health outcomes across 158 observational studies.

Bart Cillekens1, Matthias Lang1, Willem van Mechelen1, Evert Verhagen1, Maaike A Huysmans1, Andreas Holtermann2,3, Allard J van der Beek1, Pieter Coenen4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Physical activity (PA) has substantial benefits across a range of health outcomes. There is uncertainty about the PA-specific health effects, and in particular, the occupational domain. In this umbrella review, we synthesised available evidence on the associations between occupational PA (OPA) and health-related outcomes (including cancer, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease). This work informed the development of WHO's guidelines on PA and sedentary behaviour (2020).
DESIGN: Umbrella review of systematic reviews. DATA SOURCE: We performed a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Sportdiscuss from database inception to 2 December 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included systematic reviews if they contained a quantitative assessment of OPA and its relationship with at least one health-related outcome.
RESULTS: We summarised the evidence of 17 reviews covering 23 unique health-related outcomes. We graded most evidence as low or very low, or moderate quality. We found health benefits for those engaging in high versus low OPA for multiple cancer outcomes (including colon and prostate), ischaemic stroke, coronary heart disease and mental health (ie, mental well-being and life satisfaction). High OPA was associated with unfavourable health outcomes for all-cause mortality in men, mental ill health (ie, depression and anxiety), osteoarthritis, and sleep quality and duration.
CONCLUSIONS: We found favourable associations for most health-related outcomes with high OPA levels, but we also found some evidence for unfavourable associations due to high OPA levels. At this point, there is a need for better quality evidence to provide a unequivocal statement on the health effects of OPA. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health; physical activity; review

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33239353     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  16 in total

1.  Physical Activity Is Associated With Sleep Quality: Results of the ESSE-RF Epidemiological Study.

Authors:  Elena Dubinina; Lyudmila S Korostovtseva; Oxana Rotar; Valeria Amelina; Maria Boyarinova; Mikhail Bochkarev; Tatiana Shashkova; Elena Baranova; Roman Libis; Dmitry Duplyakov; Yurii Sviryaev; Aleksandra Konradi; Eugene Shlyakhto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-08-05

2.  The physical activity paradox: a longitudinal study of the implications for burnout.

Authors:  Juriena D de Vries; Arnold B Bakker
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.851

3.  Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach.

Authors:  Johanna Popp; Eva Grüne; Johannes Carl; Jana Semrau; Klaus Pfeifer
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-03-15

4.  The physical activity paradox in cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: the contemporary Copenhagen General Population Study with 104 046 adults.

Authors:  Andreas Holtermann; Peter Schnohr; Børge Grønne Nordestgaard; Jacob Louis Marott
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 35.855

5.  Measurement of Physical Activity by Shoe-Based Accelerometers-Calibration and Free-Living Validation.

Authors:  Jonatan Fridolfsson; Daniel Arvidsson; Stefan Grau
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Self-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events-A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox.

Authors:  Roman P Kuster; Philip von Rosen; Wilhelmus J A Grooten; Ing-Mari Dohrn; Maria Hagströmer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in shift and non-shift workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Malebogo Monnaatsie; Stuart J H Biddle; Shahjahan Khan; Tracy Kolbe-Alexander
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-10-12

8.  Time trends and inequalities of physical activity domains and sitting time in South America.

Authors:  André O Werneck; Raphael Ho Araujo; Nicolas Aguilar-Farias; Gerson Ferrari; Javier Brazo-Sayavera; Christian García-Witulski; Victor Z Dourado; Luciana L Barboza; Ellen Cm Silva; Kabir P Sadarangani; Ramfis Nieto-Martinez; Antonio García-Hermoso; Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Danilo R Silva
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.413

Review 9.  The effect of leisure time physical activity and sedentary behaviour on the health of workers with different occupational physical activity demands: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie A Prince; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Aviroop Biswas; Andreas Holtermann; Tarnbir Aulakh; Katherine Merucci; Pieter Coenen
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Association between Objectively Measured Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep Quality in Japanese Adults: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Keita Kinoshita; Naoki Ozato; Tohru Yamaguchi; Motoki Sudo; Yukari Yamashiro; Kenta Mori; Yoshihisa Katsuragi; Takuji Yasukawa; Koichi Murashita; Shigeyuki Nakaji; Kazushige Ihara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.