Karolina Agnieszka Wartolowska1, Alastair John Stewart Webb1. 1. Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) progress with age and hypertension, but the key period of exposure to elevated blood pressure (BP), and the relative role of systolic BP (SBP) vs. diastolic BP (DBP), remains unclear. This study aims to determine the relationship between WMH and concurrent vs. past BP. METHODS AND RESULTS: UK Biobank is a prospective community-based cohort of 40-69-year olds from 22 centres, with magnetic resonance imaging in a subgroup of over 40 000 people at 4-12 years after baseline assessment. Standardized associations between WMH load (WMH volume normalized by total white matter volume and logit-transformed) and concurrent vs. past BP were determined using linear models, adjusted for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, BP source, assessment centre, and time since baseline. Associations adjusted for regression dilution bias were determined between median WMH and usual SBP or DBP, stratified by age and baseline BP.In 37 041 eligible participants with WMH data and BP measures, WMH were more strongly associated with concurrent SBP [DBP: β = 0.064, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.050-0.078; SBP: β = 0.076, 95% CI 0.062-0.090], but the strongest association was for past DBP (DBP: β = 0.087, 95% CI 0.064-0.109; SBP: β = 0.045, 95% CI 0.022-0.069), particularly under the age of 50 (DBP: β = 0.103, 95% CI 0.055-0.152; SBP: β = 0.012, 95% CI -0.044 to 0.069). Due to the higher prevalence of elevated SBP, median WMH increased 1.126 (95% CI 1.107-1.146) per 10 mmHg usual SBP and 1.106 (95% CI 1.090-1.122) per 5 mmHg usual DBP, whilst the population attributable fraction of WMH in the top decile was greater for elevated SBP (19.1% for concurrent SBP; 24.4% for past SBP). Any increase in BP, even below 140 for SBP and below 90 mmHg for DBP, and especially if requiring antihypertensive medication, was associated with increased WMH. CONCLUSIONS: WMH were strongly associated with concurrent and past elevated BP with the population burden of severe WMH greatest for SBP. However, before the age of 50, DBP was more strongly associated with WMH. Long-term prevention of WMH may require control of even mildly elevated midlife DBP.
AIMS: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) progress with age and hypertension, but the key period of exposure to elevated blood pressure (BP), and the relative role of systolic BP (SBP) vs. diastolic BP (DBP), remains unclear. This study aims to determine the relationship between WMH and concurrent vs. past BP. METHODS AND RESULTS: UK Biobank is a prospective community-based cohort of 40-69-year olds from 22 centres, with magnetic resonance imaging in a subgroup of over 40 000 people at 4-12 years after baseline assessment. Standardized associations between WMH load (WMH volume normalized by total white matter volume and logit-transformed) and concurrent vs. past BP were determined using linear models, adjusted for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, BP source, assessment centre, and time since baseline. Associations adjusted for regression dilution bias were determined between median WMH and usual SBP or DBP, stratified by age and baseline BP.In 37 041 eligible participants with WMH data and BP measures, WMH were more strongly associated with concurrent SBP [DBP: β = 0.064, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.050-0.078; SBP: β = 0.076, 95% CI 0.062-0.090], but the strongest association was for past DBP (DBP: β = 0.087, 95% CI 0.064-0.109; SBP: β = 0.045, 95% CI 0.022-0.069), particularly under the age of 50 (DBP: β = 0.103, 95% CI 0.055-0.152; SBP: β = 0.012, 95% CI -0.044 to 0.069). Due to the higher prevalence of elevated SBP, median WMH increased 1.126 (95% CI 1.107-1.146) per 10 mmHg usual SBP and 1.106 (95% CI 1.090-1.122) per 5 mmHg usual DBP, whilst the population attributable fraction of WMH in the top decile was greater for elevated SBP (19.1% for concurrent SBP; 24.4% for past SBP). Any increase in BP, even below 140 for SBP and below 90 mmHg for DBP, and especially if requiring antihypertensive medication, was associated with increased WMH. CONCLUSIONS: WMH were strongly associated with concurrent and past elevated BP with the population burden of severe WMH greatest for SBP. However, before the age of 50, DBP was more strongly associated with WMH. Long-term prevention of WMH may require control of even mildly elevated midlife DBP.
Authors: Anna Poggesi; Leonardo Pantoni; Domenico Inzitari; Franz Fazekas; Josè Ferro; John O'Brien; Michael Hennerici; Philip Scheltens; Timo Erkinjuntti; Marieke Visser; Peter Langhorne; Hugues Chabriat; Gunhild Waldemar; Anders Wallin; Anders Wahlund Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Michiko Inaba; Lon White; Christina Bell; Randi Chen; Helen Petrovitch; Lenore Launer; Robert D Abbott; G Webster Ross; Kamal Masaki Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Tessa van Middelaar; Lonneke A van Vught; Willem A van Gool; Esther M F Simons; Bert-Jan H van den Born; Eric P Moll van Charante; Edo Richard Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Bryan Williams; Giuseppe Mancia; Wilko Spiering; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Michel Azizi; Michel Burnier; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Giovanni de Simone; Anna Dominiczak; Thomas Kahan; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Redon; Luis Ruilope; Alberto Zanchetti; Mary Kerins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Reinhold Kreutz; Stephane Laurent; Gregory Y H Lip; Richard McManus; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Frank Ruschitzka; Roland E Schmieder; Evgeny Shlyakhto; Costas Tsioufis; Victor Aboyans; Ileana Desormais Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: S E Kjeldsen; T Hedner; K Jamerson; S Julius; W E Haley; M Zabalgoitia; A R Butt; S N Rahman; L Hansson Journal: Hypertension Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Justin Marcus; Hannah Gardener; Tatjana Rundek; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Charles Decarli; Clinton B Wright Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Andrew G Pearson; Kathleen B Miller; Adam T Corkery; Nicole A Eisenmann; Anna J Howery; Karly A Cody; Nathaniel A Chin; Sterling C Johnson; Jill N Barnes Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 5.702