Literature DB >> 33238284

Validation of a Three-Item Short Form of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-3) in the German Population.

Sören Kliem1, Hans-Christian Puls2,3, Andreas Hinz4, Anette Kersting5, Elmar Brähler5,6,7, Anja Hilbert5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Individuals suffering from overweight or obesity frequently experience weight-based stigmatization. The widespread belief that weight is a matter of personal will and self-control results in various weight-based stereotypes (e.g., laziness, lack of self-discipline, or neglect).
OBJECTIVE: Based on the modified version of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M), a short form for the economic assessment of weight bias internalization in the general population was compiled and validated.
METHODS: A three-item short form (WBIS-3) was derived based on data from a representative sample of the German population (n = 1,092). This new short form was validated in a second representative population sample (n = 2,513). Item characteristics and internal consistency were obtained. Measurement invariance was tested. Construct validity was established via the correlation with theoretically related constructs (depression, anxiety, eating behavior, discrimination, weight status). To establish scale validity, all analyses were performed for the whole sample as well as for the subsample of individuals with overweight. Age- and gender-specific population norms were provided.
RESULTS: The WBIS-3 exhibited excellent psychometric properties. Internal consistency was α = 0.92. Strong measurement invariance was confirmed regarding age, gender, discrimination, and weight status in both the whole sample as well as the overweight subsample.
CONCLUSIONS: The WBIS-3 constitutes a valid and economical tool for the assessment of weight bias internalization in epidemiological contexts. Measurement invariance allows for an unbiased comparison of means, correlation coefficients, and path coefficients within structural equation modeling across groups.
© 2020 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Epidemiologic studies; Obesity; Overweight; Psychometrics; Social perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33238284      PMCID: PMC7802509          DOI: 10.1159/000510923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Facts        ISSN: 1662-4025            Impact factor:   3.942


  19 in total

1.  Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener GAD-7, based on a large German general population sample.

Authors:  Andreas Hinz; Annette M Klein; Elmar Brähler; Heide Glaesmer; Tobias Luck; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Kerstin Wirkner; Anja Hilbert
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Weight-based discrimination: an ubiquitary phenomenon?

Authors:  C Sikorski; J Spahlholz; M Hartlev; S G Riedel-Heller
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Weight bias internalization and health: a systematic review.

Authors:  R L Pearl; R M Puhl
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 9.213

4.  Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; K Kroenke; J B Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Measuring weight self-stigma: the weight self-stigma questionnaire.

Authors:  Jason Lillis; Jason B Luoma; Michael E Levin; Steven C Hayes
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the weight bias internalization scale.

Authors:  Laura E Durso; Janet D Latner
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America.

Authors:  R M Puhl; T Andreyeva; K D Brownell
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Public Support for Weight-Related Antidiscrimination Laws and Policies.

Authors:  Anja Hilbert; Claudia Hübner; Gabriele Schmutzer; Sigrun Danielsdottir; Elmar Brähler; Rebecca Puhl
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.942

9.  Comparing Self-Report Measures of Internalized Weight Stigma: The Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire versus the Weight Bias Internalization Scale.

Authors:  Claudia Hübner; Ricarda Schmidt; Janine Selle; Hinrich Köhler; Astrid Müller; Martina de Zwaan; Anja Hilbert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Weight bias internalization in a commercial weight management sample: prevalence and correlates.

Authors:  R L Pearl; M S Himmelstein; R M Puhl; T A Wadden; A C Wojtanowski; G D Foster
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2019-07-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Spanish validation of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M) for adolescents.

Authors:  Ana Andrés; Albert Fornieles-Deu; Ana Rosa Sepúlveda; Lucía Beltrán-Garrayo; Albert Montcada-Ribera; Anna Bach-Faig; David Sánchez-Carracedo
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.008

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.